https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
James Cowgill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
IRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41984
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41984&action=edit
vsx-f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77953
--- Comment #2 from James Cowgill ---
This appears to be fixed with GCC 7. It is still broken on the GCC 6 branch
though (using 6.4).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
--- Comment #5 from James Cowgill ---
I have just noticed this which seems curious. Is the 39 -> 40 combine really a
valid transformation? It seems we've lost the sign extension and we're just
putting a 32-bit value into a 64-bit register without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78012
James Cowgill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78338
--- Comment #1 from James Cowgill ---
Seems to be fixed in r242522
2016-11-16 Jason Merrill
* rtl.h: Declare gt_ggc_mx and gt_pch_nx.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65618
James Cowgill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65618
James Cowgill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdsandiford at googlemail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65618
--- Comment #9 from James Cowgill ---
Created attachment 40348
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40348&action=edit
pr-65618.patch
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 40394
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40394&action=edit
union-twice
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 40509
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40509&action=edit
a-except.adb
Maciej asked me to file a PR to add the testcase I used t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79071
--- Comment #1 from James Cowgill ---
Created attachment 40510
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40510&action=edit
a-except.ads
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Originally from https://bugs.debian.org/798710
On generic MIPS targets (ie something like mipsel-linux-gnu), libgccjit does
not work. Running the "Smoketest example&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77300
--- Comment #3 from James Cowgill ---
$ mipsel-linux-gnu-readelf -r src.o
Relocation section '.rel.text' at offset 0x584 contains 6 entries:
Offset InfoTypeSym.Value Sym. Name
1005 R_MIPS_HI16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77300
James Cowgill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 39795
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39795&action=edit
reduced source
Compil
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 39937
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39937&action=edit
testcase
Originally from the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176
James Cowgill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #39937|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176
--- Comment #3 from James Cowgill ---
As far as I can tell, all the pointers in the original C code are valid and do
not wrap. Some of the registers wrap, but they're not pointers (until added
with other registers).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65780
james410 at cowgill dot org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james410 at cowgill dot
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
When invoking ld manually, with the lto plugin, but without passing the
lto_wrapper option, this assertion fails. I know it's stupid to do this, bu
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 39474
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39474&action=edit
22 matches
Mail list logo