https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103604
--- Comment #10 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to YunQiang Su from comment #6)
>
> This patch can solve this problem: of course, we need to back port it to
> gcc-10/gcc-11 also.
>
> The problem is due to that:
> N32 and N64 uses different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103604
--- Comment #14 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to YunQiang Su from comment #13)
> And please have a wait, I need to make sure that this patch can work with
> N32.
So on gcc230, what I see is:
| C | D |
32 | 144 | 160 |
o64 | 160 | 148
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103604
--- Comment #15 from Iain Buclaw ---
Created attachment 51999
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51999&action=edit
mips stat_t patch
Patch matches field declarations I can see in the headers, and it for sure
reigns it in.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103604
--- Comment #16 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #15)
> Don't think it would fail now the statically allocated size is *at least*
> same as C. But some alias is still not matching up.
core.sys.posix.sys.types is implic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103604
--- Comment #18 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #16)
> (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #15)
> > Don't think it would fail now the statically allocated size is *at least*
> > same as C. But some alias is still no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103604
--- Comment #20 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to YunQiang Su from comment #17)
> (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #15)
> > > Don't think it would fail now the statically allocated size is *at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103739
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Why is the library not installed alongside the host compiler though? The D
core runtime compiles and works well on powerpc64-linux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103528
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> * toplevel configure needs to make certain that the bootstrap gdc can compile
> *and link* some trivial D program. Letting the build proceed otherwise
> leads
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103728
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Not sure if there'd be much help from the compiler on this front, as it's a
runtime library feature that unittests are executed in the first place - the
compiler simply generates functions in the proper place
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103739
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||9.3.1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103739
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> Thanks. But the point of this PR is that bootstrapping trunk is broken.
> That needs fixing some way.
It's working when you use gcc-10 or later as the basel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103528
--- Comment #7 from Iain Buclaw ---
Created attachment 52018
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52018&action=edit
configure check compiler driver understands D
How does this patch look?
Because the module name is not "object"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103528
--- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #7)
> Created attachment 52018 [details]
> configure check compiler driver understands D
>
> How does this patch look?
>
> Because the module name is not "object", it bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103604
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103739
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102094
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.2.1 |12.0
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102094
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102185
Bug ID: 102185
Summary: d: STRING_CSTs converted back into StringExp include
null pointer in length
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102185
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102428
Bug ID: 102428
Summary: d: Set TREE_NOTHROW for nothrow functions and library
calls
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102476
Bug ID: 102476
Summary: d: Options -fmain and -fno-druntime do not work
together
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102476
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102574
Bug ID: 102574
Summary: d: gdc driver ignores -static-libstdc++ when
automatically linking libstdc++ library
Product: gcc
Version: 9.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102574
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102837
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
Testing this patch.
--- a/libphobos/libdruntime/gcc/deh.d
+++ b/libphobos/libdruntime/gcc/deh.d
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ struct ExceptionHeader
*/
static void free(ExceptionHeader* eh) @nogc
{
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102959
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> (gdb) p array
> $2 = {16, 678}
> (gdb) p u
> $3 = {i = 0, b = false}
> (gdb) n
> 9 u.i = 0xDEADBEEF;
> (gdb) n
> 10assert(array[u.b] == 678);
> (gdb)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103015
Bug ID: 103015
Summary: [i386][solaris] Segmentation fault loading pointer to
TLS
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103015
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
The specific CPU config options of -m32 are: -mcpu=generic -march=pentium4
-mtune=generic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103015
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Are you using Solaris's ld or as? Or what version of binutils are you using?
> Yes it does matter here.
Configured gcc --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/bin/ld --wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102959
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102837
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107552
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Isn't this a duplicate of pr104749, which got fixed in 9.4.0?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106977
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Is there a (sort of simple) bootstrap process one can follow for 32-bit OSX?
I have the means to test locally, but I can't get much further than building
gdc-11 -m32 - using said compiler to bootstrap mainlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106977
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2)
> My builds are on Mac OS X 10.7/Darwin 11 still. What macOS version are
> you trying this on? FWIW, I gave up on 32-bit builds with macOS
> 10.14/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107592
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Generated function:
---
void foo (struct _param_0)
{
void label = <<< error >>>;
label:;
while (1)
{
{
struct thing;
thing = _param_0;
goto ;
}
goto ;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107671
Bug ID: 107671
Summary: i386: Missed optimization: use of bt in bit test
pattern when LHS is an array index
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107671
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Non-pointer variants also not detected.
---
int bt32v_setb(const __UINT32_TYPE__ v, __UINT32_TYPE__ bitnum)
{
return ((v & (1 << (bitnum & 31 != 0;
}
int bt64v_setb(const __UINT64_TYPE__ v, __UINT64_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107671
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
Expected generated code would be:
---
bt32_setb*:
...
shrl$5, %edx
movl(%eax,%edx,4), %edx
xorl%eax, %eax
btl %ecx, %edx
setb%al
...
---
bt32_setae*:
...
shrl$5, %edx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107671
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> from:
> movl%esi, %ecx
> movl$1, %eax
> sall%cl, %eax
> testl %edi, %eax
> setne %al
> movzbl %al, %
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107749
Bug ID: 107749
Summary: onlinedocs: gdc docs got removed during sphinx revert
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107592
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107749
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050
Bug ID: 108050
Summary: d: internal compiler error: in visit, at
d/imports.cc:72
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Doesn't even need to be a template that's imported. Two or more overloadable
functions will trigger the ICE as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108055
Bug ID: 108055
Summary: d: Undefined reference to nested lambda in template
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108055
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
Bug ID: 105659
Summary: error: #error You must define PREFERRED_DEBUGGING_TYPE
if DWARF is not supported
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
If I recall the conversation correctly, either the CPU-specific D language
hooks should be moved to macros - equivalent to TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS and
others. Or the tm_d file should be packed with a lot more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #1)
> If I recall the conversation correctly, either the CPU-specific D language
> hooks should be moved to macros - equivalent to TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS and
> others. O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105544
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105942
Bug ID: 105942
Summary: [12 Regression] d: internal compiler error: in visit,
at d/expr.cc:945
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105942
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/dlang/dm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105413
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106139
Bug ID: 106139
Summary: d: aggregate value used where floating point was
expected
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106139
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Note, gdc-11 and gdc-10 error as a result to a different issue.
---
cannot resolve type for cast(__vector(int[8]))arr
---
Fix was made in a newer version of upstream dmd, so that'll be handled in the
backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106139
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101691
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101273
Bug ID: 101273
Summary: d: missed RVO optimization with non-pod structs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101273
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #0)
> It looks like fixing PR d/100882 introduced a small regression:
On further inspection, this is not the case. The front-end semantic pass
returns us code that uses a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101282
Bug ID: 101282
Summary: d: RHS value lost when a target_expr appears in a
cond_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101282
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101273
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100552
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101619
Bug ID: 101619
Summary: d: Change in DotTemplateExp type semantics leading to
regression
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101441
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Upstream dmd fixed bug much later than 2.076.
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9920
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101490
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Reduced test
---
struct test
{
int[0] foo;
}
void main()
{
test* t;
auto a = cast(typeof(t.foo)[0])t.foo;
write(a);
}
void write(S)(S args)
{
foreach (arg; args)
{
}
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101640
Bug ID: 101640
Summary: d: Wrong evaluation order of binary expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 9.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101127
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101441
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101490
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101619
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101640
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101656
Bug ID: 101656
Summary: d: Don't escape quoted format strings in
escape_d_format
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101657
Bug ID: 101657
Summary: d: di header file created even if errors occur
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101664
Bug ID: 101664
Summary: d: Return the correct value for C++ constructor calls
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101672
Bug ID: 101672
Summary: d: Allow use of classes without the runtime if they
only contain static members
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101672
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101657
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101656
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101664
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96435
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101664
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #0)
> > C++ constructors return void, even though the front-end semantic treats them
> > as implicitly returning `this'.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101691
Bug ID: 101691
Summary: d: Use of LOOP_EXPR prevents removing no-op loops.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113667
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113772
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114155
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Upstream is notified,
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/16263#issuecomment-1969502776
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114171
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
Removed druntime dependency.
---
import gcc.builtins;
struct Token {
string label;
}
struct BreakStatement {
ulong pad;
Token label;
}
pragma(inline, false)
auto newclass()
{
void *p = __built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114171
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Unless gdc somehow guarantees bn->label and init are 128bit aligned
> then "casting" this way is broken. You can of course use
> build_aligned_type to build a pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113758
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113125
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114171
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112285
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112290
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113081
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
It could be moved to drtstuff.o to avoid it being in the library, but unless
there's an equivalent function available there'll be crashes caused by the GC
free'ing live objects as it did not scan all TLS varia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113081
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #2)
> If I recall correctly, this trick is not guaranteed to work (for a
> drtbegin.o and drtend.o object), as there really no control over where in
> the TLS section the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114155
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
Fix to format hexstrings as big endian has been committed from upstream merge.
r14-9505
This should be resolved now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109681
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114155
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
201 - 300 of 327 matches
Mail list logo
