http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-10-25 17:37:10
UTC ---
I think you may be looking at the wrong thing. The libbacktrace configure.ac
only uses GCC_CHECK_UNWIND_GETIPINFO when it is built as a target library. You
are seeing a fa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #17 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-10-25 17:41:26
UTC ---
Thanks for attaching the config.log. The config.log suggests that this
program:
int
main ()
{
return _Unwind_GetIPInfo ();
}
both compiles and links when using G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #19 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-10-25 18:55:25
UTC ---
Yes, I'm sure, because
test -n "${with_target_subdir}"
is true exactly when libbacktrace is being built as a target library. That
test will not be true when libbacktra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #24 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-10-25 23:51:00
UTC ---
The patch in comment #22 is OK with a ChangeLog entry.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55087
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55087
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55087
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-10-27 00:55:14
UTC ---
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55228
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
--- Comment #8 from ian at airs dot com 2009-08-24 16:00 ---
Over in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-06/msg00704.html you expressed the
opposite opinion, which is why I haven't taken any action.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40500
--- Comment #12 from ian at airs dot com 2009-09-28 21:30 ---
-Wall no longer implies -Wjump-misses-init.
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
++ --enable-clocale=ieee_1003.1-2001 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ian at airs dot com
: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42099
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-03 23:31:29
UTC ---
Sorry, it was Joseph, not Jakub, who mentioned the patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-04 01:48:23
UTC ---
Thanks for the patches. Are you OK with signing the copyright license
agreement described at the end of http://golang.org/doc/contribute.html ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-05 00:08:43
UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46965
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46959
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46960
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46963
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46961
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46964
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-05 01:07:49
UTC ---
Let me know when you have signed it. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47160
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47159
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47161
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47176
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47248
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47248
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-10 22:06:09
UTC ---
I've committed the fix to gold to both binutils mainline and the binutils 2.21
branch.
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-01/msg00142.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47219
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-14 18:23:28
UTC ---
Proposed patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00916.html .
||ian at airs dot com
Resolution||WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-21 21:44:25
UTC ---
The naming similarity is unfortunate. However, there are many computing
products and services named Go. In the 13 months since the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #127
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47452
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47461
Summary: warn_unused_result attribute ignored for templates
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-25 19:17:49
UTC ---
The patch looks reasonable to me, though I would like to hear Andreas's
opinion.
Technically this patch should go to the libffi maintainers, as libffi is
maintained in a separate r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47540
Summary: ARM THUMB crash with complex numbers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47540
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-30 07:57:23
UTC ---
Created attachment 23166
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23166
Possible patch
This is a possible patch for this bug. It fixes what appears to be an obvious
bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47540
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47515
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-31 22:21:19
UTC ---
The backward hacking around libtool is because of the need to create .gox
files, for which I need the .o file. Part of the complexity here is
historical, though, from a time when w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47515
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-31 23:44:46
UTC ---
Revision 169456, committed to mainline, avoids the --whole-archive problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47579
Summary: STL size() == 0 does unnecessary shift
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47602
Summary: Permit inline asm to clobber PIC register
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47602
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47602
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-04 00:08:42
UTC ---
The old bug was about bad code generation, and that was fixed. I don't think
it needs to be reopened.
I can not find any discussion about fixing this issue in any way other than
f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47602
--- Comment #8 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-04 05:31:08
UTC ---
I'm suggesting saving and restoring it around the asm statement itself, not in
the prologue and epilogue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47602
--- Comment #10 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-04 14:16:32
UTC ---
What advantage do we bring to our users by requiring them to be aware of the
details of the PIC register when writing inline asm code? Again, those who
*are* aware of the PIC regi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
Summary: RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-04 21:27:40
UTC ---
It's similar to PR 46878 in that this is also CC0 related, but it is different
code that is splitting up the CC0 setter and the CC0 user. My sources do
include the patch for PR 468
||2011.02.06 19:37:49
CC||ian at airs dot com
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ian at airs dot com
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-07 01:48:58
UTC ---
Good point, I added a note to the wiki page.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-08 15:41:35
UTC ---
Works for me with current mainline gold and eglibc 2.11.1 on Ubuntu Lucid. Can
you show me the -v line from your link command?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
--- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-08 18:41:53
UTC ---
I just tried glibc 2.12.2 on Fedora 13 and it worked there too. I don't have a
Fedora 14 system.
This program eats memory and your numbers show it had allocated over 434M when
it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47378
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
--- Comment #11 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-08 21:29:59
UTC ---
Thanks. Can you also disassemble the start of the function foo in the
executable?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
--- Comment #13 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-09 01:33:53
UTC ---
I'm stumped. Everything looks OK, but it also looks like the stack is getting
overrun. The function foo is asking for 0x4000 bytes in addition to what it
needs itself; that shoul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #24 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-09 14:10:25
UTC ---
The first branch of darwin_dbx_register_number looks like it will use the wrong
register numbers in debug info. The second branch looks like it will do the
wrong thing for -gstabs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #26 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-09 15:13:22
UTC ---
I think the patch to dwarf2out.c is all you need and I don't understand why you
are thinking about any patch to config/i386/darwin.h and config/i386/darwin.c
at all.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #28 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-09 16:53:22
UTC ---
Then let's find out why that is.
The patch in comment #23 looks clearly incorrect to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47673
Summary: Redundant NULL check
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
--- Comment #14 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-14 21:32:08
UTC ---
I built current binutils mainline on a Fedora 14 x86_64 system using
--enable-gold. I built current gcc mainline on the same system using --with-ld
to point it at the newly built
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
--- Comment #10 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Created attachment 30323
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30323&action=edit
Possible patch
Can you see if this patch fixes the problem?
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ian at airs dot com
The rules in C99 Annex G say that if either part of a complex number is
infinity, then the whole number is treated as infinity. The rules imply but do
not clearly state that an operation involving
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57675
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57675
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57689
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
It's going to be hard for me to solve this using a cross-compiler. I would
need a full glibc to get to the point of failure. Can you try building the
compiler without optimization to see if you can get a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57689
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
That makes it sound like the problem is that stage2 GCC is mis-compiling stage3
GCC, and that it's only a coincidence that the error occurs when building
libgo.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58075
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
That compilation error means that a configure test detected that the setcontext
call modified TLS variables, which should not happen. That does happen on some
older versions of Solaris and NetBSD, and the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58075
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Yes, please. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58476
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58454
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58476
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bootstrap failure with Go |In top-level configure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50166
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-08-24 17:59:14
UTC ---
I haven't been able to recreate this crash yet. According to the backtrace the
crash occurs the very first time a value is added to
Integer_type::named_integer_types, which is a st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584
Bug #: 50584
Summary: No warning for passing small array to C99 static array
declarator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
||ian at airs dot com
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-10-07 22:54:30
UTC ---
Fixed in mainline. Sorry for the long delay. Thanks for reporting the
problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-10-10 04:19:03
UTC ---
Created attachment 25451
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25451
Possible patch
It's mainly a matter of style, but this is the approach I prefer.
||ian at airs dot com
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-10-10 20:35:28
UTC ---
Fixed in mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50777
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-10-18 21:07:12
UTC ---
I would advise handling madvise in the same way that we handle AM_ICONV in
gcc/configure.ac, to work around a similar issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50857
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50938
Bug #: 50938
Summary: x86 alloca adds 15 twice
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52586
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-04-30 15:45:06
UTC ---
Unfortunately the MIPS64 machine in the GCC compile farm, gcc42.fsffrance.org,
is running a version of glibc that is too old to build libgo. It is using
glibc 2.7, which does not h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52586
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37303
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37303
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52586
--- Comment #10 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-05-02 04:33:56
UTC ---
I don't understand the archive/zip test failure. The files in question are
libgo/go/archive/zip/testdata/go-with-datadesc-sig.zip and
go-no-datadesc-sig.zip. They exist in the re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53299
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53299
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-05-11 00:17:49
UTC ---
Sure, one way to solve this problem would be to change libiberty to use
automake and libtool.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-07-13 17:47:18
UTC ---
The version of Go on the 4.6 branch is quite out-dated. I don't mind if
somebody tries to fix it up, but I don't plan to do so myself. I strongly
recommend that anybody using gccg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52079
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-02-01 14:22:36
UTC ---
The patch to gcc/go/go-lang.c is OK. You don't need the #if as far as I'm
concerned.
(The whole idea of a frontend hook for type_for_mode is somewhat broken
anyhow.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Bug #: 52205
Summary: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails
with -fnon-call-exceptions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Statu
301 - 400 of 1634 matches
Mail list logo