http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56177
--- Comment #6 from niXman 2013-02-06 04:16:30 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Fixed.
Thank you.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56389
niXman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.nixman at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55171
--- Comment #13 from niXman 2013-05-06 22:31:01 UTC
---
Kai, any ideas?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #19 from niXman 2012-09-10 20:04:16 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Created attachment 27846 [details]
> proposed patch
>
> This fixes the C and C++ part.
This patch is correct. Why not apply?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54895
Bug #: 54895
Summary: the compiler treats '__cdecl' & '__stdcall' as the
same.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54895
--- Comment #1 from niXman 2012-10-10 19:53:48 UTC
---
used i686-w64-mingw32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54995
--- Comment #1 from niXman 2012-10-20 07:15:28 UTC
---
> App crash:
> http://liveworkspace.org/code/3d5e51c9059ea4f37ce2d0d23739d374
More detailed output.
source:
#include
typedef void(*void_func)();
void foo(void_func f) {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58080
--- Comment #12 from niXman ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #9)
> Fixed for 4.9.0.
Can you provide a commit number, please?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58080
--- Comment #14 from niXman ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #13)
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=201512
thank you
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: i.nixman at gmail dot com
When compiled this code with '-g':
template< typename A, typename B >
struct bijection {
auto size() const { return 0; } // error
//auto size() const -> int { return
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
Bug #: 50616
Summary: lto1.exe: internal compiler error: invalid resolution
in the resolution file
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
--- Comment #1 from niXman 2011-10-04 18:35:30 UTC
---
Created attachment 25416
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25416
LTO test sources
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
niXman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50736
Bug #: 50736
Summary: ISO_IEC_14882-2011-5.1.2/10 - bug
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49910
niXman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53211
Bug #: 53211
Summary: range-based 'for' expression of type 'const int []'
has incomplete type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53211
--- Comment #2 from niXman 2012-05-03 16:04:26 UTC
---
This code also works:
#include
template
void func(Args... args) {
const int arr[] = {args...};
for (int it: arr) { // !
std::cout << it << std::endl;
}
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52300
Bug #: 52300
Summary: Gthreads functions linking error at dynamic linking
with libstdc++ when using MinGW.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
--- Comment #9 from niXman 2012-02-19 16:22:52 UTC
---
lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c?view=markup
line 363.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52300
--- Comment #2 from niXman 2012-02-19 17:14:03 UTC
---
Thanks Kai!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52368
Bug #: 52368
Summary: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at
expr.c:326
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52787
Bug #: 52787
Summary: Segmentation fault on MinGW
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52787
--- Comment #2 from niXman 2012-03-30 19:55:51 UTC
---
>Based to your e-mail on gcc-help, you left out a very important piece of
information.
Yes, Ian. I had to mention it.
And yes, I'm not saying that libitm is supported by MinGW. And yes, as li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53139
Bug #: 53139
Summary: internal compiler error: expected a type, got
'#'tree_vec' not supported by dump_expr#'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53139
--- Comment #3 from niXman 2012-04-27 11:08:17 UTC
---
with 4.7-branch rev-186846 and trunk rev-186841 - everything is ok.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51265
Bug #: 51265
Summary: internal compiler error: in finish_decltype_type, at
cp/semantics.c:5244
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
--- Comment #3 from niXman 2012-01-03 09:53:59 UTC
---
Created attachment 26229
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26229
sources + temp files + logs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
--- Comment #5 from niXman 2012-01-08 15:15:19 UTC
---
I don't have other GCC versions or lto-pugins on my computer.
Here is a fragment of code from gcc-4.6.2-release:
fprintf (f, "%u %x %s %s\n", (unsigned int) slot, symtab->aux[j].id,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
--- Comment #6 from niXman 2012-01-16 01:43:56 UTC
---
Replacing "%llx" to "%I64x" solves the problem.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3b2e7499(v=vs.80).aspx
Thanks, niXman.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51979
Bug #: 51979
Summary: variadic templates + lambda capture list = error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55225
--- Comment #2 from niXman 2012-11-21 08:09:40 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Fixed in mingw-w64 trunk
Strange that the mingw-w64 developers didn't report that the bug is fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54895
--- Comment #5 from niXman 2012-11-22 18:37:55 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is most likely a duplicate of already fixed PR/55268.
I checked upon the 193725 revision.
The first test gives the same result. The second test now g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
--- Comment #19 from niXman 2013-01-05 21:24:03 UTC
---
Why not apply to gcc-4_7-branch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56177
Bug #: 56177
Summary: ICE when used forward for 'auto f();'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49910
Summary: "internal compiler error: in redirect_jump, at
jump.c:1485" when build ppl-0.11.2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
35 matches
Mail list logo
