http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49937
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-08-09
20:25:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT is the
> "biggest alignment that any data type can require on this machine, in bits"
> "this is not the biggest alignment that is supp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49937
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-08-10
00:00:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 24959 [details]
> patch
>
> Patch I'm testing.
Me too: fixes the bug with no regressions for cris-elf at r177605. Thanks.
What do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49903
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 38728
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38728&action=edit
fix to be committed, pending test
Here's the patch I'll eventually test and commit.
Unfortunately, it may
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to David B. Robins from comment #0)
> Runs of "make check-gcc-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=cris-sim"
> with/without the fix do not differ in passes/failures.
But that doesn't use -fpic or -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to David B. Robins from comment #7)
> I have verified that the pr71571.C test case attached does expose the bug on
> trunk and that it passes with the above fix.
Great, thanks for the report a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #8)
> all that's "stopping" optimizations.
Bad choice of words, I meant "all that's needed to stop optimizations from
making choices that would not expose th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to David B. Robins from comment #10)
> My apologies, I saw the example you pointed at was from torture/ but
> missed/forgot that you had also wanted the new test there. I moved the file
> to t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Jun 20 20:01:20 2016
New Revision: 237615
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237615&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71571
* config/cris/cris.c (cris_asm_output_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Jun 20 20:02:03 2016
New Revision: 237616
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237616&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71571
* g++.dg/torture/pr71571.C: New test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to David B. Robins from comment #12)
> Note that it does still need -fno-inline.
I almost missed.
> I know why it doesn't crash with -O0: there is a text-section constant
> inserted after th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99363
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99352
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-02-23 00:00:00 |2021-3-5
--- Comment #16 from Hans-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99230
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Created attachment 50414 [details]
> gcc11-pr99230.patch
>
> Untested fix.
Tested at r11-7589 for cris-elf, fixes the fail with no regressions.
Thanks!
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jason at gcc dot gnu.org, nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux
Target: cris-elf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99212
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6)
> Answering my own question:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Types.html
> [...]
Nothing here for a month+. Any chance of this getting progress in (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
It looks like commit 41019bfae2673a818 / r11-8011 "libstdc++: Clarify
static_assert message" accidentally swept this under the carpet.
If I cut off the last word, " type", i.e. the second changed line ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99212
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> xfail/pass depending on sizeof (int) might be possible but as said it might
> be that cris doesn't have sizeof (int) == 1
You meant something else here tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99212
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||xfail
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Pet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Appears to be related to (PR 100052 and) PR 12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97473
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98370
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
JFTR, likely all "32-bit targets".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98370
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4)
> > JFTR, likely all "32-bit targets".
>
> Not x86, that uses int for int32_t.
So on closer inspection,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98370
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58243
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Confirmed; identical code w./wo. -fno-tree-sra for cris-elf too.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99082
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50215
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50215&action=edit
test-case gcc.dg/t
gcc dot gnu.org |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99142
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66171
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95757
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-07-01 00:00:00 |2021-2-23
--- Comment #14 from Hans
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
For cris-elf, this test has failed as follows, since some change in the range
cd0233527af1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99212
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-23
Status|UNCON
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org, sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99230
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Adding author of the switch rewrite (the trigging commit).
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux
Target: cris-elf
Since
||2021-02-27
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99307
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99307
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93372
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99363
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Shouldn't this be closed as fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
This and several other FAILs have re-appeared on master for cris-elf.
I think my autotester log entry is to the point:
... 2021-06-15-15:17:36 1de31913d20a (f: 88, p: 46598)
*** regress-11 (f: 99, p: 46
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
With a commit in the series r13-4522-gba1536dac780f3..r13-4532-gda7fb32d403759,
the test std/time/hh_mm_ss/1.cc start
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108632
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107561
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107561
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #6)
> IMHO these tests and AFAICT the underlying issue has seen no attention for
> months and should be xfailed. On it...
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: cris-elf, pru-elf
Tl;DR: not a dup of PR98531, but a bug in libstdc++-v3. Also, a regression.
For cris-elf, these
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108672
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRM
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target: cris-elf
I'v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Diff of .s for mzero3 at -O2:
--- /x/0/gccobj/gcc/testsuite/gcc/mzero3.x2-mzero3.s2023-02-10
17:57:56.786279467 +0100
+++ /x/1/gccobj/gcc/testsuite/gcc/mzero3.x2-mzero3.s2023-02-10
17:57:06.0839
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #1)
> I think the problem is that cris uses the old reload pass. Could you check
> the following patch:
Will do, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 54450
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54450&action=edit
suggested change
Here's the exact patch I'm testing, on top of the mentioned commit.
(In submittable form
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Oh, already committed. Still testing, FWIW.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Can the reporter please affirm that the issue is now solved (ppc64 m32 BE)?
It is for cris-elf, but it wouldn't be right closing someone elses bug-report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 106120, which changed state.
Bug 106120 Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails
since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108752
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105959
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target: cris-elf
Source from r13-5978-g4f5a1198065d.
Running the test-suite for a cross to cris-elf on x86_64-pc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108828
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Oops, the second xfail for gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c is wrong and I never
noticed the xpass at the time. Same for pru-elf and m68k-linux. Will commit
an update; a revert of that line (of the commit f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108982
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109098
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105959
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 54658
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54658&action=edit
mine, from native build/test of yesterday (see file for exact version).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105959
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> DejaGnu version 1.6.1
> Expect version5.45.4
> Tcl version 8.6
Close enough to say that's probably *not* it, also see below...
> What does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024
--- Comment #24 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23)
> CCing MIPS maintainers on this (and also LoongArch, while there is no ABI
> incompatibility for a new port, it is perhaps something to discuss and
> decid
,
|i?86-*-*|i?86-*-*, m68k-*, cris-*
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
...and cris-elf and m68k according to
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2022-April/758712.html so I guess
all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98886
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105297
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Consistent with Jakub's comment#2, also appearing for cris-elf (between
r12-8173-ge580f81d22d611 and r12-8175-ga54137c88061c7), and apparently all
other targets judging from today's gcc-testresults post
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #4)
> You either need to remove the above two lines to get a valid program
> or remove the testcase as it's testing processor dependent behavior.
How about changing it to
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 52902
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106588
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106594
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106761
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103974
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 52157
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52157&action=edit
gzipped preprocessed (>1 MB) floating_to_chars.ii
Reproduce using the ungzipped file for example like so:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103974
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 52158
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52158&action=edit
brief gdb inspection session
I had to "rm *ira*.o" and "make all-gcc CXXFLAGS=-g3" and re-start the gdb
s
IRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: cris-elf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104080
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-18
Ever confirmed|0
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
I'm testing an obvious patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104080
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 52215
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52215&action=edit
patch for endian.h issue
This patch is not sufficient: after this, I get:
libtool: compile: /X-obj/./gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104080
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104080
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103974
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Yes, thanks for the quick resolution.
: ABI
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jason at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
A patch in the commit range 93faac7e32e4..79a89108dd35, no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104139
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
BTW, cris-elf structure layout is "default packed"; byte boundaries all over.
(I don't know what pru-elf does.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104033
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104139
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27576
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||il/gcc-patches/2021-Novembe
||r/584316.html
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Yoink!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Elaboration: there may be (newlib) targets (build/test setups) where the
test-setup can't link and thus erroneously gets a "yes" for these functions.
If that happens for you, look into fixing newlib (l
801 - 900 of 1135 matches
Mail list logo
