[Bug libstdc++/78565] undefined reference to `aligned_alloc' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

2018-03-10 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78565 Georg Koppen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/79190] [7 Regression] ld: (Warning) Unsatisfied symbol "aligned_alloc"

2018-03-10 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190 Georg Koppen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gk at torproject dot org --- Comment #13

[Bug c++/71262] New: ICE when compiling mozilla-central (rev 298652)

2016-05-24 Thread gk at torproject dot org
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gk at torproject dot org Target Milestone: --- Compiling mozilla-central (rev 298652) with the latest gcc (rev 236630) leads to a compiler error: 5:53.95 /home/thomas/Arbeit/Tor/mozilla-central/obj-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/dist

[Bug c++/71262] ICE when compiling mozilla-central (rev 298652)

2016-05-24 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71262 --- Comment #1 from Georg Koppen --- Created attachment 38556 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38556&action=edit Compressed .ii file Attached is the compressed .ii file.

[Bug sanitizer/61408] r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2016-05-26 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61408 Georg Koppen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/61475] Building Firefox with ASan is broken in the packaging step

2016-05-26 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61475 Georg Koppen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/71291] New: Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

2016-05-26 Thread gk at torproject dot org
Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gk at torproject dot org CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug sanitizer/71291] Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

2016-05-26 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291 --- Comment #1 from Georg Koppen --- I wonder if there are any good things I could do to debug this problem before looking at the stack trace itself. Any ideas?

[Bug sanitizer/71291] Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

2016-05-26 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291 --- Comment #3 from Georg Koppen --- Created attachment 38573 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38573&action=edit ASan stack trace This is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1268854 and attached is the ASan stack tra

[Bug sanitizer/71291] Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

2016-05-26 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291 --- Comment #4 from Georg Koppen --- Created attachment 38574 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38574&action=edit .ii file Here comes the .ii file.

[Bug sanitizer/71291] Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

2016-05-26 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291 --- Comment #5 from Georg Koppen --- And that's the g++ command line: /usr/bin/g++ -std=gnu++11 -o Unified_cpp_gfx_layers2.o -c -I/home/thomas/Arbeit/Tor/mozilla-central/obj-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/dist/stl_wrappers -I/home/thomas/Arbeit/Tor/mozilla

[Bug sanitizer/71291] Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

2016-05-27 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291 --- Comment #7 from Georg Koppen --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > (In reply to Georg Koppen from comment #3) > > Created attachment 38573 [details] > > ASan stack trace > > > > This is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug sanitizer/71291] Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

2016-05-29 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291 --- Comment #8 from Georg Koppen --- Looking at the stack trace again. It says "Memory access at offset 112 underflows this variable" yet ASan reports stack-buffer-overflow. I am confused. Shouldn't it report a stack-buffer-underflow then?

[Bug sanitizer/71291] Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

2016-05-31 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291 Georg Koppen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/71291] Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

2016-06-01 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291 --- Comment #12 from Georg Koppen --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #10) > I've build Firefox locally with clang with optimizations disabled > (CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address -fsanitize-recover=address -O0") and got pretty > the same back

[Bug libstdc++/77459] [6 Regression] undefined reference to `snprintf' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

2016-11-28 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459 --- Comment #11 from Georg Koppen --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > Assuming r242055 fixed it then. Yes, that issue is not showing up anymore when compiling with r242055.

[Bug libstdc++/78565] New: undefined reference to `aligned_alloc' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

2016-11-28 Thread gk at torproject dot org
erity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gk at torproject dot org Target Milestone: --- When testing r242055 to check whether it fixes bug 77459 (which it seems to do) I ran into another issue. This time

[Bug libstdc++/77459] New: undefined reference to `snprintf' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

2016-09-02 Thread gk at torproject dot org
erity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gk at torproject dot org Target Milestone: --- When switching GCC to 6.2.0 I get the following compiler error while trying to build the mingw-w64 cross-compiler:

[Bug libstdc++/77459] [6/7 Regression] undefined reference to `snprintf' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

2016-09-27 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459 Georg Koppen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug libstdc++/77459] [6/7 Regression] undefined reference to `snprintf' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

2016-09-27 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459 --- Comment #3 from Georg Koppen --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > It's 2016, how can snprintf not be supported still? I asked about that problem in #mingw-w64 a while ago and got the following answer: M$ does not provide `snp

[Bug libstdc++/77459] [6/7 Regression] undefined reference to `snprintf' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

2016-09-29 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459 --- Comment #5 from Georg Koppen --- No, it is still broken after applying the patch to 6.2.0: ../src/c++11/.libs/libc++11convenience.a(debug.o): In function `format_word': /home/ubuntu/build/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/../../../

[Bug sanitizer/61314] New: Building GCC 4.9.0 breaks in libbacktrace on Ubuntu Lucid Lynx

2014-05-26 Thread gk at torproject dot org
Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gk at torproject dot org CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org When building

[Bug sanitizer/61314] Building GCC 4.9.0 breaks in libbacktrace on Ubuntu Lucid Lynx

2014-05-26 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61314 --- Comment #2 from Georg Koppen --- Created attachment 32856 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32856&action=edit config.log Attached is the config.log. Here comes some additional information that might help to understand this

[Bug sanitizer/61314] Building GCC 4.9.0 breaks in libbacktrace on Ubuntu Lucid and Precise using libfaketime

2014-05-28 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61314 Georg Koppen changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Building GCC 4.9.0 breaks |Building GCC 4.9.0 breaks

[Bug sanitizer/61408] New: r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2014-06-03 Thread gk at torproject dot org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gk at torproject dot org CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot

[Bug sanitizer/61408] r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2014-06-03 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61408 --- Comment #1 from Georg Koppen --- I am happy to debug this further (and am, of course, interested in a fix/workaround). Let me know what you need.

[Bug sanitizer/61408] r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2014-06-04 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61408 --- Comment #3 from Georg Koppen --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #2) > Does this happen with GCC trunk? Hard to say as it crashes differently: Executing /home/gk/asan/mozilla-esr24/obj-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/dist/bin/xpcshell

[Bug sanitizer/61408] r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2014-06-04 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61408 --- Comment #5 from Georg Koppen --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #4) > > > LLVM trunk? > > > > Have not tried yet. Shall I? > > asan is being developed in LLVM trunk. > So if there is a bug in run-time it's better to investigate

[Bug sanitizer/61408] r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2014-06-05 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61408 --- Comment #7 from Georg Koppen --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > I'd say there is no point in doing that. Just build the compiler-rt library > and link it in statically (-static-libasan) with gcc instead of the gcc one. Hmm...

[Bug sanitizer/61408] r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2014-06-09 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61408 --- Comment #8 from Georg Koppen --- While I am still unable to compile/test Firefox 24 with clang trunk I managed to compile it with clang's r196090 which is the one r205695 merged. And there the problem occurs as well. Thus, we know at least th

[Bug sanitizer/61475] New: Building Firefox with ASan is broken in the packaging step

2014-06-11 Thread gk at torproject dot org
Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gk at torproject dot org CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org As mentioned in bug

[Bug sanitizer/61408] r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2014-06-11 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61408 --- Comment #9 from Georg Koppen --- (In reply to Georg Koppen from comment #8) > Not sure about the problem in comment 3 yet which is > probably better tracked in a different bug. I'll open one as soon as my > build machine is not occupied anymo

[Bug sanitizer/61475] Building Firefox with ASan is broken in the packaging step

2014-06-11 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61475 --- Comment #3 from Georg Koppen --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #1) > Please > 1. try building with -static-libasan I'll do that once I am done with investigating bug 61408. > 2. provide full reproduction steps 1) Take an

[Bug sanitizer/61475] Building Firefox with ASan is broken in the packaging step

2014-06-11 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61475 --- Comment #4 from Georg Koppen --- Created attachment 32924 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32924&action=edit .mozconfig for building Firefox ESR 24 with ASan

[Bug sanitizer/61408] r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2014-06-11 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61408 --- Comment #10 from Georg Koppen --- Okay. LLVM/Clang trunk does not cope with the packaging step either. Sending the crash through asan_symbolize.py gives: Executing /home/gk/asan/mozilla-esr24/obj-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/dist/bin/xpcshell -g

[Bug sanitizer/61475] Building Firefox with ASan is broken in the packaging step

2014-06-12 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61475 --- Comment #5 from Georg Koppen --- (In reply to Georg Koppen from comment #3) > (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #1) > > Please > > 1. try building with -static-libasan > > I'll do that once I am done with investigating bug 61408.

[Bug c++/61482] New: ICE when compiling Firefox ESR 24 with r211488

2014-06-12 Thread gk at torproject dot org
: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gk at torproject dot org When compiling Firefox ESR 24 on an 64bit Ubuntu Precise machine with r211488 I get home/gk/asan/mozilla-esr24/layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp: In member function 'already_AddRefed mo

[Bug sanitizer/61408] r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2014-06-16 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61408 --- Comment #11 from Georg Koppen --- Working around was tricky, so I started bisecting LLVM/clang/compiler-rt. The first bad revision there is r193602. Might be worth filing an upstream bug (I don't have a Google account), I guess.

[Bug sanitizer/61408] r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2014-06-16 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61408 --- Comment #13 from Georg Koppen --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #12) > I am not sure what does your bisection of LLVM/clang/compiler-rt mean > if you say that clang trunk works fine. There are two different issues here in this

[Bug sanitizer/61475] Building Firefox with ASan is broken in the packaging step

2014-06-24 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61475 --- Comment #8 from Georg Koppen --- (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #7) > Have you tried patch proposed in bug 61422? No, as it is not applying cleanly anymore.

[Bug c++/67876] New: ICE when compiling Firefox 38

2015-10-06 Thread gk at torproject dot org
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gk at torproject dot org Target Milestone: --- I get an internal compiler error when compiling Firefox 38 with GCC master. This is not happening with GCC 5.1.0: c++ -o Unified_cpp_certverifier0.o -c -I../../dist/stl_wrappers -I../../dist

[Bug c++/67876] ICE when compiling Firefox 38

2015-10-08 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876 --- Comment #2 from Georg Koppen --- Created attachment 36464 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36464&action=edit Preprocessed file for Unified_cpp_certverifier0.cpp Attached is the compressed preprocessed file. FWIW: GCC 5.2.

[Bug bootstrap/64320] Missing config.h during findcomp.cc compilation

2015-11-27 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64320 Georg Koppen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gk at torproject dot org --- Comment #3

[Bug sanitizer/68650] New: Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

2015-12-01 Thread gk at torproject dot org
NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gk at torproject dot org CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc

[Bug sanitizer/68650] Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

2015-12-01 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68650 --- Comment #1 from Georg Koppen --- To give a bit more context the flags used for compilation are: export CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address -Dxmalloc=myxmalloc" export CXXFLAGS="-fsanitize=address -Dxmalloc=myxmalloc" export LDFLAGS="-fsanitize=addres

[Bug sanitizer/68650] Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

2015-12-03 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68650 --- Comment #4 from Georg Koppen --- It is using -lasan it seems: Executing: c++ -o firefox -Wall -Wempty-body -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsign-compare -Wwrite-strings -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wcast-align -v -fsanitize=address -Dxmalloc=myxmalloc -fno-

[Bug sanitizer/68650] Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

2015-12-03 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68650 --- Comment #6 from Georg Koppen --- Alright, thanks. So, what happens with r215527 is that checking for dlopen() working properly in the configure script is not enough anymore to decide whether one needs -ldl needs to get added explicitly if add

[Bug sanitizer/68650] Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

2015-12-03 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68650 Georg Koppen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---