[Bug c/33426] New: Support of #pragma ivdep

2007-09-13 Thread gjunk at sapience dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gjunk at sapience dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426

[Bug c/33427] New: Support of #pragma ivdep

2007-09-13 Thread gjunk at sapience dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gjunk at sapience dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33427

[Bug other/33426] Support of #pragma ivdep

2007-09-13 Thread gjunk at sapience dot com
--- Comment #8 from gjunk at sapience dot com 2007-09-13 22:21 --- *** Bug 33427 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426

[Bug c/33427] Support of #pragma ivdep

2007-09-13 Thread gjunk at sapience dot com
--- Comment #1 from gjunk at sapience dot com 2007-09-13 22:21 --- Oops - clicked refresh by mistake- feel free to delete this - sorry. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33426 *** -- gjunk at sapience dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug other/33426] Support of #pragma ivdep

2007-09-19 Thread gjunk at sapience dot com
--- Comment #9 from gjunk at sapience dot com 2007-09-19 21:34 --- Thanks for feedback - not exactly sure where this leaves things - but if gcc can deliver the same kind of floating point performance as icc it would be a really good thing. The 2005 article - wasn't clear to me

[Bug other/33426] Support of #pragma ivdep

2011-05-07 Thread gjunk at sapience dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426 --- Comment #11 from gene 2011-05-07 12:15:22 UTC --- Any update on this ?

[Bug other/33426] Support of #pragma ivdep

2010-11-02 Thread gjunk at sapience dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426 --- Comment #10 from gene 2010-11-02 20:16:32 UTC --- I wonder if this thread is germaine or useful to this enhancement request ? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-10/msg00352.html g/