Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gjunk at sapience dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gjunk at sapience dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33427
--- Comment #8 from gjunk at sapience dot com 2007-09-13 22:21 ---
*** Bug 33427 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426
--- Comment #1 from gjunk at sapience dot com 2007-09-13 22:21 ---
Oops - clicked refresh by mistake- feel free to delete this - sorry.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33426 ***
--
gjunk at sapience dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #9 from gjunk at sapience dot com 2007-09-19 21:34 ---
Thanks for feedback - not exactly sure where this leaves things - but if gcc
can deliver the same kind of floating point performance as icc it would be a
really good thing.
The 2005 article - wasn't clear to me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426
--- Comment #11 from gene 2011-05-07 12:15:22 UTC
---
Any update on this ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426
--- Comment #10 from gene 2010-11-02 20:16:32 UTC
---
I wonder if this thread is germaine or useful to this enhancement request ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-10/msg00352.html
g/