http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #83 from Georg 2013-02-09 18:10:26
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #82)
> Hopefully fixed once for all.
Just to confirm:
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
Bug #: 56344
Summary: ICE for program with larger automatic structs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
Georg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29467|0 |1
is obsolete|
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: georggcc at googlemail dot com
IIUC, the definition of CAT in ada.h should replace a##b not
present in traditional C compilers. If still applicable, the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53592
Bug #: 53592
Summary: ICE when hitting assigment to component of SSE
vector_type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #3 from Georg 2012-06-11 10:09:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > Other versions of the Ada compiler, and the C compiler,
> > and the C++ compiler of the same version produce
> > 1 DIVPD instruction, as expected.
>
> Which other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #4 from Georg 2012-06-11 10:31:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > > Other versions of the Ada compiler, and the C compiler,
> > > and the C++ compiler of the same version produce
> > > 1 DIVPD instructi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #6 from Georg 2012-06-11 10:59:41
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > Small note: Same sequence of instructions from GNAT GPL 2011
> > running on x86_64 Linux/GNU:
>
> You're comparing apples with oranges though, that isn't the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #8 from Georg 2012-06-13 17:11:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Yes, it's a fallout of -fnon-call-exceptions that stems from the Java
> semantics. GNAT GPL doesn't care about Java so it implements more aggressive
> dead code el
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #11 from Georg 2012-06-15 14:54:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Fixed on the mainline.
Perfect result when run with -fdelete-dead-exceptions, or when
run without the switch (i.e., switches as before).
Adding -fno-delete-dead-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53686
Bug #: 53686
Summary: gnatchop -r raises STORAGE_ERROR on all inputs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53747
Bug #: 53747
Summary: Rep clause on index type makes 'access of aliased
component an error when renaming
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54178
Bug #: 54178
Summary: qualifying a record aggregate incorrectly hides names
in local instantiation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55324
Bug #: 55324
Summary: diagnostic about abstract new in type derivation
misleading due to being overly terse
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
Georg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||georggcc at googlemail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #70 from Georg 2013-02-02 23:53:35
UTC ---
Don't know whether this matters in any way, but I should perhaps mention that
the system of comment #65 does not have autogen installed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62122
--- Comment #2 from Georg ---
Created attachment 40352
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40352&action=edit
changes to example in GNAT RM section on Unrestricted_Access
Since variable Global needs initialization, I have added a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39589
Georg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||georggcc at googlemail dot com
--- Comment #8
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: georggcc at googlemail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
procedure Address_Clause_on_Named_Number is
C : constant := 5 with Address => Anything;
begin
null;
end ;
$ gcc -c -gn
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: georggcc at googlemail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The program below triggers an unexpected Assert failure of a static
expression. The same static expression occurs identically in the same
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: georggcc at googlemail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-apple-darwin15
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin15
Bui
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: georggcc at googlemail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The introductory comment in GNAT.Regexp about GNAT.Regpat states
that the latter is an implementation of
IRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: georggcc at googlemail dot com
Created attachment 32517
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32517&action=edit
full program text
The p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60730
Georg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||georggcc at googlemail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60730
--- Comment #3 from Georg ---
I have used the new simplified bug reporting form, hence no triple.
Several platforms are affected; the GCC 4.9 used with this report
was built on Darwin Kernel Version 13.1.0: Thu Jan 16 19:40:37
PST 2014; root:xnu-
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: georggcc at googlemail dot com
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;
with System;
procedure Float_Segfault is
type Flt is digits System.Max_Digits;
package Fio is new Float_IO
verity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: georggcc at googlemail dot com
Assuming that in generic associations, a box needs to have "others =>" before
it unless it is the sole item, GNAT s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
--- Comment #11 from Georg ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #10)
> Fixed.
For clarity, just asking: Does this mean that
1. if I compile a program on HOST with bit size N,
for a TARGET with bit size M, then gcc will sorry()
just in ca
MED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: georggcc at googlemail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The protected procedure declared in P1 makes gcc reject its body,
and only if Interrupt_Handler is given the va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35919
Georg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||georggcc at googlemail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32164
Georg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||georggcc at googlemail dot com
--- Comment #16
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: georggcc at googlemail dot com
The example illustrating 'Unrestricted_Access for subprograms
declares a type access procedure with null exclusion, named
Less_Nested, in the body
32 matches
Mail list logo
