gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx
GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-freebsd7.2
GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-freebsd7.2
GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-freebsd7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40310
--- Comment #1 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-05-30 15:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=17937)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17937&action=view)
Patch to Makefile to use 64 bit FreeBSD system package.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #2 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-05-30 15:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=17938)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17938&action=view)
64 bit FreeBSD system package.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40310
--- Comment #3 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-05-30 15:03 ---
I've just noticed that I accidentally left in a "# PATCHED" comment
in the c8.diff patch. Anyone who commits this patch will probably
want to remove that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40310
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx
GCC target triplet: i386-portbld-freebsd6.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39294
--- Comment #1 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-02-24 20:05 ---
Have just been informed that this isn't a bug.
Oops.
--
gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx changed:
What|Removed |
Summary: GNAT appears to misbehave with limited tagged types and
possibly finalization
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned a
--- Comment #1 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-22 05:27 ---
By "causes a crash" above, I meant that the generated code crashes at
the highlighted line.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42140
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42141
--- Comment #2 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-22 16:41 ---
A couple of people have commented on the anonymous access type
(claiming it causes the crash). Here's a version with it removed
and a gdb backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation
--- Comment #4 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-22 17:10 ---
Quiet you.
My code might be a lot better if I didn't create dangling references
in the second example.
I think the short example is basically just broken code and entirely
my fault. The code linked to in th
--- Comment #5 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-22 18:37 ---
Closing this bug as the discussion has become confused between
two separate issues, one of them apparently invalid.
--
gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx changed:
What|Removed
/extended return
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx
GCC host t
--- Comment #2 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-22 19:11 ---
Files here:
http://coreland.ath.cx/tmp/pfseudo_bug.tar.gz
Edit build.sh to point $GCC to whatever's sensible.
Output here:
$ ./build.sh
+ GCC=/gnat/svn/builds/r154285/bin/gcc-r154285
+ /gnat/svn/builds/r1
--- Comment #3 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 08:15 ---
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-portbld-freebsd7.2
Configured with: ./..//gcc-4.4.0/configure --enable-languages=c,ada
--disable-nls --with-system-zlib --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local
--program-suffix=44
--- Comment #4 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 08:16 ---
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/gnat/svn/builds/r154285/bin/gcc-r154285
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/gnat/svn/builds/r154285/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.2/4.5.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.2
--- Comment #6 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=19090)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19090&action=view)
source file that generates the error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #7 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=19091)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19091&action=view)
dependency for arc_dir_003.adb
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #8 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=19092)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19092&action=view)
dependency for arc_dir_003.adb
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #9 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=19093)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19093&action=view)
dependency for arc_dir_003.adb
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #10 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:17
---
Created an attachment (id=19094)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19094&action=view)
dependency for arc_dir_003.adb
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #11 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:18
---
Created an attachment (id=19095)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19095&action=view)
dependency for arc_dir_003.adb
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #12 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:18
---
Created an attachment (id=19096)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19096&action=view)
dependency for arc_dir_003.adb
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #13 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:18
---
Created an attachment (id=19097)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19097&action=view)
dependency for arc_dir_003.adb
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #14 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:19
---
Created an attachment (id=19098)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19098&action=view)
dependency for arc_dir_003.adb
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #15 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:19
---
Created an attachment (id=19099)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19099&action=view)
dependency for arc_dir_003.adb
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #16 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:19
---
Created an attachment (id=19100)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19100&action=view)
dependency for arc_dir_003.adb
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #17 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:19
---
Created an attachment (id=19101)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19101&action=view)
dependency for arc_dir_003.adb
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #18 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:20
---
Created an attachment (id=19102)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19102&action=view)
dependency for arc_dir_003.adb
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #19 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 10:22
---
Really fail to see how this is more convenient or useful for anyone involved
but oh well, what do I know?
gcc-4.4.0:
gcc -c pfseudo.ads pfseudo-path.adb pfseudo-archiver.ads
pfseudo-archiver-directory.adb
--- Comment #21 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 11:12
---
Created an attachment (id=19103)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19103&action=view)
version suitable for gnatchop
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
--- Comment #22 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-23 11:13
---
Any way I can remove the above attachments?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
riority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx
GCC host triplet: x86_64-portbld-freebsd7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42168
--- Comment #1 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-24 20:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=19112)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19112&action=view)
case 1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42168
--- Comment #2 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2009-11-24 20:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=19113)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19113&action=view)
Assertion failure with with_clause removed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42168
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-freebsd8.0, i486-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42793
--- Comment #1 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2010-01-18 18:13 ---
I'm attempting to submit the repro case as an attachment but bugzilla keeps
suffering internal errors. Admin contacted...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42793
--- Comment #2 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2010-01-18 18:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=19648)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19648&action=view)
Repro case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42793
--- Comment #3 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2010-01-18 22:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=19651)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19651&action=view)
Another repro
This appears to be the same bug but giving a slightly more interesting
crash
--- Comment #23 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2010-01-18 22:51
---
Created an attachment (id=19652)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19652&action=view)
Another repro
A smaller, simpler piece of code that triggers this:
$ gnatmake p.adb
p.adb:8:70: wro
--- Comment #24 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2010-01-18 22:53
---
Created an attachment (id=19653)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19653&action=view)
A smaller repro for the "_master conflicts with declaration" error
$ gnatmake arc_d
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-freebsd8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42816
--- Comment #1 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2010-01-20 21:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=19668)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19668&action=view)
Repro
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42816
--- Comment #3 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2010-01-21 08:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=19675)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19675&action=view)
Simpler repro
As usual, here's a smaller repro that provokes the same crash.
--
http:/
--- Comment #4 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2010-01-21 08:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=19676)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19676&action=view)
Even simpler
Some experimentation has determined that the protected object isn't even
necessary
ct bug box
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx
GCC host triplet: i486-pc-linux-g
--- Comment #1 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2010-02-03 20:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=19798)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19798&action=view)
Repro
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42948
--- Comment #2 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2010-02-03 20:28 ---
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.5.0 20090514 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure
exp_ch6.adb:4603|
| Error detected at ng.adb:6:7 [main.adb:20:7
--- Comment #3 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2010-02-03 20:29 ---
A GNAT Pro customer I speak to says:
main.adb:20:07: instantiation error at ng.adb:6
main.adb:20:07: missing argument for parameter "_Object" in call to "Show_N"
(inherited) at line 14
--
49 matches
Mail list logo
