http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850
--- Comment #3 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2010-10-02
17:30:05 UTC ---
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850
>
> Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
>
> What |Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850
--- Comment #4 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2010-10-02
17:32:08 UTC ---
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org
> Since gcc doesn't have caret or fix-it hints, my proposal is quite modest,
> just
> color the diagnostic markers:
>
> er
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850
--- Comment #7 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2010-10-02
18:35:26 UTC ---
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:04 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org he
environment. How far should we go to emulate an IDE?
>
> So how does it work in openSUSE? Do they have patches that FSF G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850
--- Comment #8 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2010-10-02
18:41:28 UTC ---
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:30 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850
>
> --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-10-02
> 18:30:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850
--- Comment #10 from Gabriel Dos Reis
2010-10-02 22:35:12 UTC ---
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org
>> > And you say that you have colored output but you don't want FSF GCC to
>> > have it?
>> > Am I misunderstanding you?
>
