[Bug fortran/27552] -fdump-parse-tree doesn't like Holleriths (but then, who does?)

2006-05-17 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 02:31 --- Subject: Bug 27552 Author: fengwang Date: Thu May 18 02:31:41 2006 New Revision: 113881 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113881 Log: 2006-05-18 Francois-Xavier Coudert <[EMAI

[Bug fortran/28213] ICE: Hollerith constant

2006-07-10 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-11 04:09 --- Subject: Bug 28213 Author: fengwang Date: Tue Jul 11 04:09:40 2006 New Revision: 115326 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115326 Log: 2006-07-11 Feng Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/28213] ICE: Hollerith constant

2006-07-10 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-11 04:10 --- Subject: Bug 28213 Author: fengwang Date: Tue Jul 11 04:10:31 2006 New Revision: 115327 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115327 Log: 2006-07-11 Feng Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/28213] ICE: Hollerith constant

2006-07-12 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-13 06:34 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 -- fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/12456] please recognize Fortran STRING(K:K) as single character

2006-01-08 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 02:27 --- Subject: Bug 12456 Author: fengwang Date: Mon Jan 9 02:27:45 2006 New Revision: 109489 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109489 Log: fortran ChangeLog entry: 2006-01-09 Feng Wang

[Bug fortran/12456] please recognize Fortran STRING(K:K) as single character

2006-01-08 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 02:54 --- Subject: Bug 12456 Author: fengwang Date: Mon Jan 9 02:54:25 2006 New Revision: 109491 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109491 Log: fortran 2006-01-09 Feng Wang <[EMAI

[Bug fortran/25716] FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_result_11.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2006-01-10 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 03:18 --- Also fails on ia64-linux-gnu. This is the ruduced case: module cutils implicit none private type t integer :: kk(3) = (/30, 40, 50 /) end type t integer :: n8 = 3 type(t) :: tt2 public :: IntToChar7

[Bug fortran/25716] FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_result_11.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2006-01-10 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 03:38 --- And the backtrace: #0 mio_expr (ep=0x60033298) at ../../gcc-4.2-20051231/gcc/fortran/module.c:1472 #1 0x4007caa0 in mio_charlen (clp=0x600fc0a8) at ../../gcc-4.2-20051231/gcc

[Bug fortran/18827] ICE on assign to common variable

2005-03-15 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-16 00:19 --- Fixed -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

2005-03-15 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 18827, which changed state. Bug 18827 Summary: ICE on assign to common variable http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18827 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug fortran/20713] New: Don't pad parameter strings.

2005-04-01 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
ty: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20713

[Bug fortran/23852] New: Array element as format specification.

2005-09-13 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23852

[Bug fortran/22290] Optimize Assigned GOTO to cause error with -O1 or higher

2005-09-13 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-13 14:53 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Bloody hell. Stupid bug. > Alright then, let's see if I can fix this one. Steven, it seems to disappear on current gcc4.1 and gcc4.0. I once send you a patch

[Bug fortran/24327] New: Does not detect duplicate symbol names in contains block

2005-10-12 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
: ice-on-invalid-code, accepts-invalid Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24327

[Bug fortran/12456] please recognize Fortran STRING(K:K) as single character

2005-10-24 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-25 05:31 --- This will improve 168.wupwise at lease 1%. And I have partially fixed. Patches are coming soon. -- fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/22290] Optimize Assigned GOTO to cause error with -O1 or higher

2005-10-25 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-25 14:09 --- Fixed. -- fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug tree-optimization/20610] Real by complex multiplications perform unnecessary operations

2005-06-23 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-23 07:52 --- And in extract_component() in tree-complex.c file, I need handle VIEW_CONVER_EXPR. On gfortran front end, I need treat other type data as complex. So I build VIEW_CONVER_EXPR tree node and failed at

[Bug libfortran/22170] New: Handle format slash error

2005-06-24 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22170

[Bug tree-optimization/22290] New: Optimize Assigned GOTO to cause error with -O1 or higher

2005-07-04 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
r higher Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org CC

[Bug fortran/22290] Optimize Assigned GOTO to cause error with -O1 or higher

2005-07-04 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-04 12:38 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Confirmed, This is a fortran front-end or gimplifier bug. > Look at what the gimplifier produces: > int4 nz.0 = -2; // <--- this is not gimple I am not very clea

[Bug fortran/22290] Optimize Assigned GOTO to cause error with -O1 or higher

2005-07-05 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05 08:39 --- (In reply to comment #3) > "int4 nz.0 = -2;" look line an INIT_EXPR. It should be > > "int4 nz.0; > nz.0 = -2" Shall we add an assignment explicitly? Just give an

[Bug fortran/22290] Optimize Assigned GOTO to cause error with -O1 or higher

2005-07-05 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05 08:44 --- >From as.f.t22.ccp: : nz.0_1 = -1; nz.1_2 = &__label_93; D.475_3 = 0; D.476_4 = 0; if (D.476_4 != 0) goto ; else goto ; This is also wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug fortran/22290] Optimize Assigned GOTO to cause error with -O1 or higher

2005-07-06 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-06 07:42 --- (In reply to comment #4) > And another question, all the variables which have initial values are treat > as static. Is this reasonable? Yes, this is reasonable. Confirm myself. In section 5.1 (For

[Bug fortran/20883] unassigned integer used as format

2005-07-07 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-07 09:31 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/22327] [4.0 only] Wrong code in array constructor

2005-07-07 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/16531] [4.0 only, gfortran] Hollerith Data not supported

2005-07-07 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/15966] [4.0 Only] ICE and segmentation fault on internal write

2005-07-07 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/18481] [g77 regression] ICE with assigned integer variable format

2005-07-07 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-07 09:56 --- (In reply to comment #6) > The example in comment #0, I get the following error: > In file t.f:4 > read(chr,k) > 1 > Error: Variable 'k' has not been assigned a f

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

2005-07-07 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 18481, which changed state. Bug 18481 Summary: [g77 regression] ICE with assigned integer variable format http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18481 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug fortran/22342] Internal write to character array causes "internal compiler error"

2005-07-07 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-07 10:04 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15966 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/15966] [4.0 Only] ICE and segmentation fault on internal write

2005-07-07 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-07 10:04 --- *** Bug 22342 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/22423] New: Warnings when building libgfortran

2005-07-11 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
.c:94: warning: incompatible implicit ../../../gcc/libgfortran/intrinsics/unpack_generic.c:194: warning: passing argum [snip] -- Summary: Warnings when building libgfortran Product: gcc Version: 4.0.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/21730] Character length incorrect.

2005-07-13 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14 02:49 --- I think we have to consider character arrays. See: character*2 a (1) character*4 b character*6 c parameter (a="12") parameter (b = a(1)) write

[Bug fortran/21730] Character length incorrect.

2005-07-13 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14 03:30 --- For comment #5, here is the backtrace: #0 gfc_internal_error ( format=0x8447620 "Initialization expression didn't reduce %C") at ../../gcc/gcc/fortran/error.c:662 #1

[Bug fortran/21730] Character length incorrect.

2005-07-13 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14 03:46 --- I just hope you could work on this ;-) Having a good start, why not fix entirely? If somebody agrees to fix step by step, I have no objection. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730

[Bug middle-end/26001] [4.1 Regression] expand uses the wrong part of the string for array accesses

2006-02-03 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #26 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 07:51 --- Andrew, thank you for fixing this so quickly. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26001

[Bug fortran/21730] New: Character length incorrect.

2005-05-23 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

2005-05-23 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||21730 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276

[Bug fortran/18481] [g77 regression] ICE with assigned integer variable format

2005-05-25 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-25 10:45 --- Issues (#2, #3) related ASSIGN statement should be fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-05/msg00054.html [committed]. Issue in the description should be fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005

[Bug fortran/20883] unassigned integer used as format

2005-05-27 Thread fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW