[Bug c++/56243] [4.8 regression] ICE in tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6645

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/56243] [4.8 regression] ICE in tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6645

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243 --- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-23 10:42:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Any news on this bug? It's one of only a few P1 regressions left. This bug triggers with --enable-checking on the constexpr stuf

[Bug c++/56243] [4.8 regression] ICE in tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6645

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243 --- Comment #4 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-23 22:00:44 UTC --- I think the testcase is invalid Shouldn't the below line be diagnosed, even if it is in a template ? F& name = x->value; We fail to return early, and

[Bug c++/56243] [4.8 regression] ICE in tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6645

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243 --- Comment #5 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-23 22:02:16 UTC --- reduced testcase: class A { virtual int String (); }; class F: public A { }; template < typename V > class G { V value; }; c

[Bug c++/56243] [4.8 regression] ICE in tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6645

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243 --- Comment #7 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-25 20:56:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) [...] > If so, this corrected test case still triggers ICE: Good point. Further reduced: st

[Bug c++/56243] [4.8 regression] ICE in tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6645

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243 --- Comment #8 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-25 21:04:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) [...] > 2) check that the first operand of a COMPONENT_REF is actually a FIELD_DECL > before calling DECL_FIELD_IS_BASE on it.

[Bug c++/50921] GCC cannot find dependent conversion-function-id even if there's a using declaration for it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50921 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/46687] Class member lookup ambiguity w/ overloaded static members and using declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46687 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/54537] New: undiagnosed using-declaration conflicting with used function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54537 Bug #: 54537 Summary: undiagnosed using-declaration conflicting with used function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54537] undiagnosed using-declaration conflicting with used function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54537 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/37140] type inherited from base class not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37140 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fabien at gcc dot

[Bug c++/54537] undiagnosed using-declaration conflicting with used function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54537 --- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #1) > Given the OK by Paolo, I retested the patch from: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01166.html > > It needed a smal

[Bug c++/37140] type inherited from base class not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37140 --- Comment #8 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #7) > Any news on this? Sorry Paolo, no news. I will look into it after I resurrect some "stage one 1 material" patches on using decls (co

[Bug c++/58040] Cannot take address-of public using-declaration of member from protected base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58040 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/58047] parse error with typedef introduced from base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58047 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug c++/50518] New: repeated c++11 opaque enum declarations are invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 Bug #: 50518 Summary: repeated c++11 opaque enum declarations are invalid Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/6936] member "using" binds wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-09-03 21:39:27 |2011-10-09 21:39:27 Known

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING AssignedTo

[Bug c++/53247] [regression, c++11] can't use a function from a base class of the same name in a different namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53247 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b.r.longbons at gmail dot

[Bug c++/53236] using declaration and base function template overloading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53236 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fabien at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/51214] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 --- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-07 05:36:23 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Thu Jun 7 05:36:18 2012 New Revision: 188294 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188294 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 20

[Bug c++/53549] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo

[Bug c++/51214] [4.7 Regression] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 --- Comment #6 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 17:36:56 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Wed Jun 27 17:36:50 2012 New Revision: 189021 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189021 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 20

[Bug c++/51214] [4.7 Regression] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/52126] [4.7 Regression] compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52126 --- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-06 21:31:30 UTC --- I'll be assigning myself to this bug when I come back from vacation next monday.

[Bug c++/52126] [4.7 Regression] compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52126 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo

[Bug c++/52126] [4.7 Regression] compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52126 --- Comment #6 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-16 09:57:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Further investigation shows that the issue appears only when inheritance > > from > > the te

[Bug c++/52126] [4.7 Regression] compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52126 --- Comment #7 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-17 07:49:43 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Fri Feb 17 07:49:35 2012 New Revision: 184328 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184328 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 20

[Bug c++/52126] [4.7 Regression] compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52126 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/52369] Const-qualified non-class base member and defaulted default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52369 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/51214] [4.7 Regression] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[C++11] name lookup issue |[4.7 Regression] [C++11

[Bug c++/52465] [4.7 regression] g++ rejects valid code with in-class using declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c++/52465] [4.7 regression] g++ rejects valid code with in-class using declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465 --- Comment #4 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-04 21:52:15 UTC --- This is because some USING_DECLs are stored in IDENTIDIER_BINDINGs. Jason, do you agree that cxx_binding->value and cxx_binding->type should not be USING_DECLs ?

[Bug c++/52465] [4.7 regression] g++ rejects valid code with in-class using declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |fabien at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |fabien at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/52465] [4.7/4.8 regression] g++ rejects valid code with in-class using declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465 --- Comment #6 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-11 20:40:58 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Wed Apr 11 20:40:51 2012 New Revision: 186355 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186355 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 20

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 --- Comment #6 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-12 12:50:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Ping? I haven't yet finished the investigation. Something is broken in c++11 mode, the parsing of Solvable in "using sat::Solvab

[Bug c++/19377] Using declaration in "private" part causes "protected" diagnostic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19377 --- Comment #8 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 18:24:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > > You should write to Jason directly, as he is probably the only pe

[Bug c++/52465] [4.7 Regression] g++ rejects valid code with in-class using declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465 --- Comment #8 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 20:22:47 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Sun Apr 15 20:22:44 2012 New Revision: 186473 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186473 Log: 2012-04-15 Fabien Chêne

[Bug c++/52465] [4.7 Regression] g++ rejects valid code with in-class using declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 --- Comment #7 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-17 21:06:52 UTC --- Created attachment 27180 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27180 return earlier in cp_parser_alias_declaration

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 --- Comment #8 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-17 21:08:13 UTC --- It is related to alias declarations. It seems that we do not recover properly from a failure in cp_parser_alias_declaration, in the block introduced by this check: &qu

[Bug c++/51141] [4.7 regression] rev181359 causes Chromium build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51141 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |fabien at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/30195] Using declaration doesn't work in template.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30195 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/25994] Using declarations and base function overloading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25994 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/6936] member "using" binds wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/50518] [C++0x] repeated c++11 opaque enum declarations are invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/26256] ignores using declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/49132] [DR 178] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class with const data member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/51141] [4.7 regression] rev181359 causes Chromium build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51141 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 --- Comment #1 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 09:25:55 UTC --- Yet another bug caused by my recent changes with using declarations.

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 --- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 10:21:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) [...] > Jason, I'd like to run the testsuite without this 7 member rule, how could I > do > that ? To

[Bug c++/51189] [4.7 Regression] ICE in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:19261

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51189 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/51190] [4.7 Regression] 'using' causing trouble

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51190 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 --- Comment #6 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 20:24:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > It looks like the sorted fields code in lookup_field_1 needs to handle > using_decl like the unsorted fields code does. I think this wil

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 --- Comment #7 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 20:57:16 UTC --- FYI, it fixes the following PRs: c++/51190, c++/51189, c++/51188, c++/51152, c++/51141.

[Bug c++/51190] [4.7 Regression] 'using' causing trouble

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51190 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/51152] [4.7 Regression] error: X has no member named Y on code that seems valid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51152 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 --- Comment #9 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 20:59:37 UTC --- *** Bug 51189 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/51189] [4.7 Regression] ICE in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:19261

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51189 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cas43 at cs dot

[Bug c++/51141] [4.7 regression] rev181359 causes Chromium build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51141 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 --- Comment #13 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 21:53:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Let's wait and strip_using_decl after the loop (i.e. at the return statement), > since a USING_DECL has the same name. We also ne

[Bug c++/51141] [4.7 regression] rev181359 causes Chromium build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51141 --- Comment #4 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 18:44:25 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Fri Nov 18 18:44:23 2011 New Revision: 181490 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181490 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 20

[Bug c++/51214] New: [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 Bug #: 51214 Summary: [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/51214] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 --- Comment #14 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 20:32:08 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Fri Nov 18 20:32:04 2011 New Revision: 181492 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181492 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 20

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/11750] class scope using-declaration lookup not implemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/32039] Using declaration accepts non-visible members from base classes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/19377] Using declaration in "private" part causes "protected" diagnostic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19377 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/51276] ICE: in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:19261

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51276 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fabien at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/51382] Incorrect diagnostic "cannot appear in a constant-expression"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51382 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/51382] Incorrect diagnostic "cannot appear in a constant-expression"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51382 --- Comment #6 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 07:34:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > About the garbled error message - the second issue - the fix should be rather > trivial, just matter of handling USING_DECL in dump_expr to

[Bug c++/51319] [4.7 Regression] Eigen3 enums not accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51319 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug c++/51382] Incorrect diagnostic "cannot appear in a constant-expression"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51382 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.glisse at normalesup

[Bug c++/51319] [4.7 Regression] Eigen3 enums not accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51319 --- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-05 22:04:45 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Mon Dec 5 22:04:40 2011 New Revision: 182029 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182029 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 20

[Bug c++/51382] Incorrect diagnostic "cannot appear in a constant-expression"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51382 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/14258] typename in a using declaration not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 --- Comment #15 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13 18:47:04 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Tue Dec 13 18:46:58 2011 New Revision: 182292 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182292 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 20

[Bug c++/14258] typename in a using declaration not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/50518] [C++0x] repeated c++11 opaque enum declarations are invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 --- Comment #2 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-20 13:29:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Any news on this? No, sorry, I'll try to work on it before the end of stage 3.

[Bug c++/23211] using dec in nested class doesn't import name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23211 --- Comment #15 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28 19:53:19 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Wed Dec 28 19:53:14 2011 New Revision: 182711 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182711 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 20

[Bug c++/23211] using dec in nested class doesn't import name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23211 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/51214] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 --- Comment #1 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-29 20:02:15 UTC --- Here is a correct testcase for this bug. // { dg-do compile } // { dg-options "-std=c++0x" } enum { A = 1 }; struct T { int i1, i2, i3, i4, i5, i6, i7;

[Bug c++/14258] typename in a using declaration not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/26256] ignores using declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/23211] using dec in nested class doesn't import name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23211 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/30195] Using declaration doesn't work in template.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30195 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/6936] member "using" binds wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/25994] Using declarations and base function overloading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25994 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/11750] class scope using-declaration lookup not implemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750 --- Comment #9 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-14 20:12:56 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Wed Nov 14 20:12:47 2012 New Revision: 193504 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193504 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 20

[Bug c++/11750] class scope using-declaration lookup not implemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50518] [C++0x] repeated c++11 opaque enum declarations are invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC

[Bug c++/52369] Const-qualified non-class base member and defaulted default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52369 --- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: fabien Date: Wed Mar 26 21:33:28 2014 New Revision: 208854 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208854&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-03-26 Fabien Chene PR c++/52369

[Bug c++/52369] Const-qualified non-class base member and defaulted default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52369 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/60894] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Use of redundant struct keyword in virtual function prototype combined with using statement causes compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60894 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

  1   2   >