[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

--- Comment #2 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-16 11:13 --- Created an attachment (id=15774) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15774&action=view) produce more accurate column information in error messages This patch modifies the c++ parser to produ

[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

--- Comment #3 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-16 11:15 --- I forgot to say that my patch just affects the c++ front end of gcc. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31754

[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

--- Comment #4 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-18 18:24 --- Created an attachment (id=15778) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15778&action=view) more work on the error location patch This patch makes all the tests in testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error*.C b

[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

--- Comment #5 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-18 19:20 --- Created an attachment (id=15780) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15780&action=view) work in progress on more accurate column numbers Fix some compilation errors after rebasing t

[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

--- Comment #6 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-20 09:53 --- Created an attachment (id=15793) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15793&action=view) rebase against current trunk Rebased against current trunk. -- dseketel at redhat dot com

[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

--- Comment #7 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-20 12:05 --- (From update of attachment 15793) This version of the patch got sent to the mailing list at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg01329.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31754

[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

--- Comment #8 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-26 12:38 --- Created an attachment (id=15817) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15817&action=view) correct issues raised by reviews on the mailing list I have corrected the issues raised at http://gcc.gnu

[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

--- Comment #9 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-27 21:31 --- Created an attachment (id=15821) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15821&action=view) better column number in error patch [2/2] After applying this patch, all calls to error() gcc/cp/parser.c

[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

--- Comment #11 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-30 17:51 --- Created an attachment (id=15835) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15835&action=view) better column number in error patch [1/2] This is a rebase of the patch [1/2] against trunk from 200

[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

--- Comment #12 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-30 17:52 --- Created an attachment (id=15836) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15836&action=view) better column number in error patch [2/2] This is a rebase of the patch [2/2] against trunk of 2008-06-30.

[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

--- Comment #13 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-30 17:54 --- @Jon Grant: thanks for cheering ! :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31754

[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

--- Comment #14 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-07-01 16:29 --- Hello, Just a quick comment on this bug. I think that in the example you gave, gcc (at the least 4.3.0 version) is giving a correct column location. The expression gcc is complaining about is: "a +- b&qu

[Bug c++/36696] Default constructor instance definition with empty argument list quietly ignored

--- Comment #2 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-07-02 21:09 --- Yes, foo bar (); is indeed the declaration of a function bar of type foo that takes no arguments in parameter. I believe gcc is right there. -- dseketel at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/13101] incorrect warning on initialized extern const function pointer

--- Comment #2 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-07-02 22:19 --- Hello, I have sent a patch to the list at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00160.html. Hopefully that patch should fix this issue. -- dseketel at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/13699] Extern "C" routine in different namespaces accepted with different exception signature

--- Comment #3 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-07-07 14:54 --- Created an attachment (id=15871) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15871&action=view) first attempt at trying to fix the bug This patch checks that re-declaration of extern "C" functi

[Bug c++/13699] Extern "C" routine in different namespaces accepted with different exception signature

--- Comment #4 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-07-08 17:58 --- Created an attachment (id=15876) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15876&action=view) display warnings instead of error Second opus of the patch. It appears that the patch makes g++ not cap