[Bug testsuite/57687] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/comma_exp.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10

Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org Host: x86_64-apple-darwin10 Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10 Build

[Bug fortran/52413] Incorrect behavior of FRACTION when applied to a constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52413 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Why involve I/O in your test, and not just test the value like that: > > if (fraction(-2.0) /= -0.5) call abort() > > and, slightly more complicated to handle negative zero, checking both > value

[Bug fortran/42945] Gcov -a fails on Fortan generated object file (infinite loop?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42945 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/57687] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/comma_exp.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57687 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > On x86_64-linux, c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c fails, > not sure if it's a related issue or I should open a Bugzilla. > See also gcc-testresults. AFAICT the failures for comma_exp.c ar

[Bug c/57692] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c

: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c fails for both C and C++ (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-06/msg02301.html ).

[Bug testsuite/57687] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/comma_exp.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57687 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |4.9.0 --- Comment #3 from Dominiqu

[Bug fortran/46982] SIZE(TRANSFER()) as specification expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46982 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > ... So I think that the code in comment #0 is not legal. Then, should not this PR closed as INVALID?

[Bug testsuite/57686] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr57584.c with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57686 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52606] Confusing diagnostics for long identifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #8 from Dominique

[Bug fortran/47267] array constructor causing long compile times

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47267 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #6 from Dominique

[Bug fortran/25708] [F95] Module loading is not good at all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #23 from Dominique

[Bug fortran/57696] Defined assignment for components not used when those are ALLOCATABLE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57696 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57639] [OOP] ICE with polymorphism (and illegal code)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57639 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- (In reply to janus from comment #4) > > The following patch fixes both variants: > > ... and regtests cleanly. Confirmed.

[Bug fortran/57697] Segfault with defined assignment for components during intrinsic assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57697 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 30353 [details] > Test case Should not this go to PR57696?

[Bug fortran/46982] SIZE(TRANSFER()) as specification expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46982 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/34928] Extension: volatile common blocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34928 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Bud, What was the purpose of this construct? What is the valid way to replace it?

[Bug fortran/42607] add information about how to compile a module

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/51535] Optimization problem with -finit-real=snan at -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51535 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50201] gfortran with -static causes seg fault at runtime for writing double prec array with precision increased to kind=16

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50201 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52328] Wrong line in warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52328 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/57692] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57692 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/57692] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57692 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This change fixed the failures for me: --- a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c @@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ #include #endif

[Bug middle-end/45579] Re-enable IPA-CP for "fn spec"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45579 Bug 45579 depends on bug 43665, which changed state. Bug 43665 Summary: INTENT(IN) etc. optimization of calls: function annotations for noclobber/noescape arguments http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43665 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/44589] Missing not-set diagnositic (as READ arguments are clobbered)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44589 Bug 44589 depends on bug 43665, which changed state. Bug 43665 Summary: INTENT(IN) etc. optimization of calls: function annotations for noclobber/noescape arguments http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43665 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/43665] INTENT(IN) etc. optimization of calls: function annotations for noclobber/noescape arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43665 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/23169] Fortran INTENT information not used in the middle-end for optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23169 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/29697] gfortran should use TYPE_QUAL_CONST etc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29697 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Per > TYPE_QUAL_RESTRICT is now supported, see > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-08/msg00208.html > TYPE_QUAL_CONST is to my knowledge a no op, for QUAL_VOLATILE, > I have not checked whether it i

[Bug fortran/29697] gfortran should use TYPE_QUAL_CONST etc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29697 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546 Bug 24546 depends on bug 29697, which changed state. Bug 29697 Summary: gfortran should use TYPE_QUAL_CONST etc. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29697 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/31094] Support annotating function parameters as read-only and/or non-escaping

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31094 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #7 from Domini

[Bug middle-end/31279] Uninitialized warning for call-by-reference arguments with known intent(in)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31279 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Still no warning at revision 200371.

[Bug fortran/50331] -Wuninitialized and variable passed to WRITE statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50331 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546 Bug 24546 depends on bug 23280, which changed state. Bug 23280 Summary: gfortran does not emit DW_AT_entry_point (dwarf-2) debugging info http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23280 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/23280] gfortran does not emit DW_AT_entry_point (dwarf-2) debugging info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23280 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/40040] gfortran invalid DW_AT_location for overridable variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40040 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/40920] Derived type with BIND(C) - rejected as argument.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40920 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/32630] [meta-bug] ISO C binding

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630 Bug 32630 depends on bug 40920, which changed state. Bug 40920 Summary: Derived type with BIND(C) - rejected as argument. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40920 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/42651] Functions with result: Wrongly accepts attributes to function name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42651 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/40958] module files too large

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #15 from Domin

[Bug fortran/29892] substring out of bounds: Missing variable name for variables with parameter attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29892 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #8 from Domini

[Bug fortran/57710] [OOP] _vptr not set for allocatable CLASS components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57710 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- >From http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962#c20 Transformational intrinsics, done are: * all, any, count * product, sum * dot_product, matmul, transpose * pack, unpack, spread Left: *

[Bug fortran/29962] Initialization expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug fortran/25104] [F2003] Non-initialization expr. as case-selector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25104 Bug 25104 depends on bug 29962, which changed state. Bug 29962 Summary: Initialization expressions http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/31392] [meta-bug] gfortran problems with initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31392 Bug 31392 depends on bug 29962, which changed state. Bug 29962 Summary: Initialization expressions http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/31393] [meta-bug] gfortran compile-time problems with intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31393 Bug 31393 depends on bug 29962, which changed state. Bug 29962 Summary: Initialization expressions http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/32890] Compile-time detect of LHS/RHS missmatch for PACK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32890 Bug 32890 depends on bug 29962, which changed state. Bug 29962 Summary: Initialization expressions http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/37212] TRANSFER: Simplify array argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37212 Bug 37212 depends on bug 29962, which changed state. Bug 29962 Summary: Initialization expressions http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38205 Bug 38205 depends on bug 29962, which changed state. Bug 29962 Summary: Initialization expressions http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/31392] [meta-bug] gfortran problems with initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31392 Bug 31392 depends on bug 25104, which changed state. Bug 25104 Summary: [F2003] Non-initialization expr. as case-selector http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25104 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz

[Bug fortran/20585] [meta-bug] Fortran 2003 support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585 Bug 20585 depends on bug 25104, which changed state. Bug 25104 Summary: [F2003] Non-initialization expr. as case-selector http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25104 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/25104] [F2003] Non-initialization expr. as case-selector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25104 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/34547] NULL(): Fortran 2003 changes, accepts invalid, ICE on invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34547 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > However, one should go through the lengthy, convoluted thread at > > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/f014195ccf7b93e6/ >to check whether it contains some still-un

[Bug fortran/39695] [F03] ProcPtr function results: wrong name in error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- As for 4.8.1 and trunk (r200371), only the second test in comment #0 gives the 'ppr@' name: real g ! "cannot have a type" 1 Error: Symbol 'ppr@' at (1) cannot have a type The first test do

[Bug fortran/45170] [F2003] allocatable character lengths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #43 from Domin

[Bug fortran/51535] Optimization problem with -finit-real=snan at -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51535 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > As the status "accidentally fixed in 4.8 but do not know when and why" > does not exist, you may well do that. I get the SIGFPE with revision 192891 (2012-10-28) and 'In p_h_usstd!' with revision 193

[Bug fortran/57711] Fortran 4.7.2/4.8.1 error: constraints for functions parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/57687] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/comma_exp.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57687 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |x86_64-apple-darwin10

[Bug c/57474] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/sec_implicit2?.c -fcilkplus (internal compiler error) on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57474 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/57721] wrong error message with bounds checking.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57721 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46487] Missing memory freeing for functions returning allocatable scalars (allocatable_scalar_5.f90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46487 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49588] DATA statement with vector sections rejected (ICE: TODO)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49588 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug fortran/47040] Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47040 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47040] Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47040 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Nothing - it just needs to be packaged. Do you want me to do it?

[Bug fortran/53801] gfortran warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53801 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54048] Uninitialized input_location in front-end initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54048 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54788] ICE on pointer-array element assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54679] Erroneous "Expected P edit descriptor" in conjunction with L descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54679 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57697] Segfault with defined assignment for components during intrinsic assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57697 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] class containers are recycled between symbols more than they should be

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57611] [Fortran-Dev Regression] Too much memory allocated (gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_alloc_2.f90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57611 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57496] I/O: WRITE(*,*) HUGE(0._10) gives SIGFPE with -ffpe-trap=overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57496 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56596] Invalid read of size 4 gfortran.dg/class_array_7.f03

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56596 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57733] pointer assignment internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57733 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57456] [OOP] CLASS + CHARACTER ALLOCATE with typespec: For arrays, the typespec is ignored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57456 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56596] Invalid read of size 4 gfortran.dg/class_array_7.f03

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56596 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This seems to have been fixed between revision 199435 (2013-05-30) and revision 199885 (2013-06-03): revision 199528? The error ==15298== 80 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 2

[Bug testsuite/57687] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/comma_exp.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57687 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Seems to have been fixed between revisions 200407 and 200557. Could someone confirm, narrow the range, or point to the revision before I close this PR as FIXED?

[Bug c/57692] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57692 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/57687] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/comma_exp.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57687 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Fixed by revision 200554?

[Bug fortran/34547] NULL(): Fortran 2003 changes, accepts invalid, ICE on invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34547 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > It looks like it was fixed in 4.7.0 with the following error message > > Error: NULL intrinsic at (1) in data transfer statement requires MOLD= Confirmed, however compiling the second test in comment

[Bug fortran/54852] Bogus(?) warnings when compiling gfortran.dg/bind_c_vars.f90 gfortran.dg/bind_c_vars_driver.c with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54852 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57553] Valid use of STORAGE_SIZE rejected, bad error message for invalid use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57553 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45417] DEALLOCATE: No error when deallocating a target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45417 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48244] iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52176] Valgrind complains about some realloc on assignment to unallocated LHS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52176 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54384] gfortran memory leaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54384 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50149] loader error with source containing common blocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50149 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/48961] EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE(WAIT=.false.) fails on MinGW

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50516] gfortran must detect illegal statements in a block data (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50516 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52274] [Meta-bug] Fortran translation related issues: Typos and more

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52274 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57598] [Coarray,caf] Add FPE-Summary printing (floating-point exception) for STOP/ERROR STOP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57598 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57096] Allocatable variable is not behaved as expected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57096 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56471] Program crashes when allocating a derived type with an allocatable component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56471 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56596] Invalid read of size 4 gfortran.dg/class_array_7.f03

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56596 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --

[Bug fortran/55482] gfortran.dg/class_array_7.f03 execution failures with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55482 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >