[Bug fortran/51512] RFC: Bogus "Return value of function"/"INTENT(OUT) was not set" with allocatable results/dummies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51512 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49954] ICE assigning concat expression to an array deferred-length string (realloc on assignment)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49954 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49630] [OOP] ICE on obsolescent deferred-length type bound character function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56136] [OOP] ICE on lhs-reallocation of an object with overloaded (elemental) assignment operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56136 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael.morin at sfr dot fr --- Com

[Bug fortran/41827] [Cleanup] Remove SET_EXPR_LOCATION in gfc_trans_code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41827 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Is this PR another WONTFIX?

[Bug fortran/44978] extended derived types are resolved more than once

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44978 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47915] Type declaration: Recursive specification expression not detected.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47915 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52788] -fbounds-check fails for 2-rank allocatable arrays when reading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52788 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45608] Bogus error about procedure attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45608 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45619] intent(out) dummy arguements in specification statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45619 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52473] CSHIFT slow - inline it?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48776] ICE(segfault) after -std=f95 diagnostic error involving PROCEDURE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48776 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/55907] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with -fno-automatic -finit-local-zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55907 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The patch in comment 5 regtests cleanly! Confirmed. Any reason why it has not been committed?

[Bug fortran/50221] Allocatable string length fails with array assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCO

[Bug fortran/57628] spurious error: division by zero in if statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57628 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- AFAICT the option -fno-range-check is what you are looking for.

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/41370] Function return-type declaration with specification expression rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41370 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/48787] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/55117] Programs fails to read namelist (contains derived types objects)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/41827] [Cleanup] Remove SET_EXPR_LOCATION in gfc_trans_code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41827 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45288] Double initialization: Warn if the value is different

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45288 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 49586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 49586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/45288] Double initialization: Warn if the value is different

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45288 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 49586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 49586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/49586] Multiple initialization with DATA: Warning and initialization order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49586 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/49586] Multiple initialization with DATA: Warning and initialization order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49586 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/45288] Double initialization: Warn if the value is different

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45288 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47674] gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_5.f03: Segfault at run time for deferred (allocatable) string length

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/40756] Cleanup TREE_BLOCK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40756 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/41724] PUREness/ELEMENTAL check missing for ACTUAL/DUMMY conformance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41724 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/41599] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with associate-name => exp: Use (sometimes) a restricted pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41599 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52333] Explicit etime interface should work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52333 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/52651] Fortran testsuite ICEs with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52651 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53296] Segfault on non-constant character array constructor containing kind spec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53296 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57633] I/O: Problem with formatted read: reading CR-LF files (\r\n)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57633 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49802] [F2003, F2008] Wrong code with VALUE, F2008: VALUE with arrays/DIMENSION

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49802 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/44604] Wrong run-time checks with VALUE dummies and pointer/allocatable actuals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44604 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #6 from Domini

[Bug fortran/51610] [OOP] Class container does not properly handle POINTER and TARGET

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Domini

[Bug fortran/55895] multiple type-bound procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55895 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/53950] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] 1.5 times slowdown from 4.4.0 to 4.7.0 with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53950 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Summary|1.5 times s

[Bug tree-optimization/40766] this fortran program is too slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40766 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Component|fortran

[Bug fortran/45318] Do more parenthesis simplification with -fno-protect-parens

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45318 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Given Richard's comments and no testcase, I'm in doubt if this PR > is meaningful?! Any new opinion about this PR? or should we close it as WONTFIX. NOTE: I'ld like very much that the -no-protect-p

[Bug fortran/54797] Gnu Fortran compiler does not recognize module file it created

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54797 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Any progress on this PR? or should it be closed at WORKSFORME?

[Bug fortran/55867] Segmentation fault on DEALLOCATION of type with ALLOCATABLE components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55867 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/56169] Installation the Chromium from ports fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56169 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Any progress?

[Bug fortran/54096] Type bound procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/34928] Extension: volatile common blocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34928 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- No activity for over three years. I'll close it as WONTFIX in a few days if nobody care anymore.

[Bug fortran/35707] Search /usr/local/include and /usr/include for .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35707 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/51790] Broken ambiguity check when combining generic with nongeneric procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51790 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/40756] Cleanup TREE_BLOCK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40756 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Let's reopen. I want to add a TREE_BLOCK for (module) global variables > for namelists, cf. PR37132. Those would be used by the BE/LTO. I don't this is related to this PR. > Still, that's the oppor

[Bug fortran/35707] Search /usr/local/include and /usr/include for .mod files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35707 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to Daniel Franke from comment #13) > > Yes, I think that this text needs an update. > > I concur that we - still - need a better documentation on this. > It's rel

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #15) > (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #12) > > Remaining [...] is to warn on an unused namelist. I think this will involve > > marking namelists as use

[Bug fortran/52351] Wrong bounds when passing an array section to an intent-in pointer dummy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52351 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56674] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in check_sym_interfaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57307] ICE with sourced allocation with array constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57307 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56806] make: *** [spher_harm.o] Error 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56806 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56818] [meta-bug] fortran-dev bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50536] an input item shall not appear as the do-variable of any io-implied-do

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/55765] Remaining issues with unlimited polymorphic (CLASS(*))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55765 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46783] [OOP] TRANSFER with polymorphic MOLD=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46783 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46641] Specification-expr checks and results with C_SIZEOF and SIZEOF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46641 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46641] Specification-expr checks and results with C_SIZEOF and SIZEOF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46641 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This is the case up to revision 197010 (2013-03-23), but the code is > accepted after revision 197550 (2013-04-07). Can this PR be closed as FIXED? Likely revision 197053.

[Bug fortran/50536] an input item shall not appear as the do-variable of any io-implied-do

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #4 from Dominique

[Bug fortran/45824] Update expr.c's check_inquiry for C_SIZEOF, compiler_version/_options, etc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45824 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57663] Arithmetic error with -fPIC -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57663 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Is there any chance that someone has a look to this bug? No, but you can do it yourself. > I did not test all gcc/gfortran versions, so I am 100% sure that > this a 4.6-only issue. Furthermore, id

[Bug fortran/34928] Extension: volatile common blocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34928 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > As the reporter of this enhancement request, I think it is something > that should be left open. > > Low priority, but this was a 'feature' of some f77 compilers in the past. G77 does compile the t

[Bug lto/57290] [4.9 Regression] After r198333 the aermod runtime is ~10% slower when compiled with -fprotect-parens and -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57290 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/52413] Incorrect behavior of FRACTION when applied to a constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52413 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Tentative patch. Not regression tested, yet. I have applied the patch in comment #1 on top of revision 200321. I have regtested without regression and tested thet this PR is fixed for all the availab

[Bug fortran/53957] Polyhedron 11 benchmark: MP_PROP_DESIGN twice as long as other compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Anthony, could you provide a reduced test showing the problem?

[Bug fortran/53035] ICE with deferred-length module variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53035 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #7 from Domini

[Bug fortran/48303] [Legacy] Support Character constants in DATA statement for non-character variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48303 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #4 from Domini

[Bug fortran/44345] ICE in fold_convert_loc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44345 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/40958] module files too large

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #12 from Domin

[Bug fortran/28105] Check for memory allocations bigger than size_t

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28105 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/13615] -Wuninitialized produces wrong error message for characters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13615 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #11 from Domin

[Bug fortran/50538] formal argument cannot be same as procedure name (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50538 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50542] gfortran should detect violation of Fortran 95 R536 (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50542 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50546] gfortran should not accept missing operator (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50546 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/50549] should detect different type parameters in structure constructors (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50549 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50550] does not recognize pointer variable at initialization (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50551] Argumentless NULL() cannot be used with assumed-length dummy (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50551 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50552] type name cannot be statement function dummy argument (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50552 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50555] synonymous namelist/statement function dummy argument not allowed (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50555 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50525] gfortran should not allow early reference to entry dummy argument (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50525 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/31139] sum(w_re(1:nn,1)*fi(i(1:nn, ii))) up to 3.5x slower than C version

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31139 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #8 from Domini

[Bug fortran/31298] F2003: use mod, operator(+) => operator(.userOp.) not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31298 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #16 from Domin

[Bug fortran/52413] Incorrect behavior of FRACTION when applied to a constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52413 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/52413] Incorrect behavior of FRACTION when applied to a constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52413 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Before going to the machinery in comment #6, the following patch (i.e., without any mpfr_copysign) --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/simplify.c2013-06-08 21:50:33.0 +0200 +++ gcc/fortran/simplify.c

[Bug libquadmath/54012] printf crash with -lgfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46299] Diagnose specification expressions involving host-associated vars with deferred bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46299 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46271] OpenMP default(none) and procedure pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46271 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46485] gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_5.f90 fails on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46485 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46982] SIZE(TRANSFER()) as specification expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46982 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/41604] Reject result with assumed-length character in INTERFACE decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41604 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52413] Incorrect behavior of FRACTION when applied to a constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52413 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Here is the patch I plan to package and submit: --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/simplify.c2013-06-08 21:50:33.0 +0200 +++ gcc/fortran/simplify.c2013-06-23 17:19:55.0 +0200 @@ -2342,1

[Bug fortran/52413] Incorrect behavior of FRACTION when applied to a constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52413 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Last question: should I include some tests for the other available kinds?

[Bug testsuite/57686] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr57584.c with -m32

: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com, rguenther at suse dot de The tests gcc.dg/torture/pr57584.c fails in 32 bit mode: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr57584.c -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >