[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-30 14:16:37 UTC --- > I just bootstrapped r183695 (incl. Ada and Obj-C++) with > --enable-checking=release on i686-darwin9, using gcc4.6 as the bootstrap > compiler. What bootstrap compiler where

[Bug fortran/52053] SUM intrinsic is wrong for very large arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52053 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-30 14:28:13 UTC --- This is not a bug: 16777216. == 2.0**24, then you can add 1.0 as much as you like without changing the result. If one want a bug here, it is a missed optimization as SUM does n

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-30 15:44:27 UTC --- > @r183725 x86-64-darwin10, I see a compare fail on tree-ssa-strlen.o It just finished to bootstrap for me with '--enable-checking=release': [macbook] f90/bug% gfcp -v Using b

[Bug fortran/88412] Associate segmentation fault assigning to derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88412 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88393] [7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] Segfault with type-bound assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNC

[Bug sanitizer/88404] ICE (tree check) with -fsanitize=thread on Fortran2003 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88404 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/88430] -Wmissing-attributes warnings when including libquadmath headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88430 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The change occurred between r265975 (no warning) and r266035 (warnings).

[Bug middle-end/86979] [9 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 with -m32 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86979 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/86979] [9 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 with -m32 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86979 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 45203 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45203&action=edit auto-host.h > Any particular tuning option (what -march/-mtune is the default)? Target: x86_64-apple-da

[Bug middle-end/86979] [9 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 with -m32 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86979 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 45204 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45204&action=edit tarball for gcc9 -S -da /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr69102.c -Og -fschedule-insns2

[Bug fortran/88447] Non-contiguous array argument of some class not passed properly to subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88447 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/88438] [F08] A pointer function reference can denote a variable in any variable definition context.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88438 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/88455] False positive for allocatable character array of deferred length, ALLOCATE using SOURCE/MOLD [-Wuninitialized]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88455 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/53714] false positive for -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53714 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77385] "Unclassifiable statement" from gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77385 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88247] [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:2068

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88379] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in resolve_assoc_var, at fortran/resolve.c:8750

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88379 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Prior

[Bug fortran/88379] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in resolve_assoc_var, at fortran/resolve.c:8750

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88379 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88326] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88326 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88326] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88326 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Pri

[Bug fortran/88356] [9 Regression] ICE with -Werror in reduce_binary_ac, at fortran/arith.c:1318 (and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88356 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Status

[Bug fortran/88342] Possible bug with IEEE_POSITIVE_INF and -ffpe-trap=overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88342 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88463] Rejects conforming source, OpenMP Parallel region Default(None) reference to module parameter array, separate source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88463 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88298] [7/8/9 Regression] Bogus conversion warning for CSHIFT with -fno-range-check -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88298 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/88467] Silently accepts wrong array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88467 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/87048] [9 Regression] array_constructor_8.f90 failure on armeb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88420] Fortran OpenACC "Clause SEQ conflicts with INDEPENDENT"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88420 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84779] [7/8/9 Regression] Compiling gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 with -O1 or -Os and -fdefault-integer-8/9 gives an ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84779 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The code in comment 2 compiles for me with -fdefault-integer-8 (I get the error without it).

[Bug fortran/88299] [9 Regression] COMMON in a legacy module produces bogus warnings in dependent code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88299 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88254] [F18] Support construct name for CHANGE TEAM & END TEAM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/88299] [F18] COMMON in a legacy module produces bogus warnings in dependent code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88299 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9 Regression] COMMON in a |[F18] COMMON in a legacy

[Bug fortran/88399] program segmentation faults when out-of-memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88399 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/82018] -Wextra should imply -Wconversion-extra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82018 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > However, quite honestly, as a volunteer contributor to an open-source project, > I guess I'm free to choose whether I want to contribute at all, and when > and how to contribute. I'm sure my priorit

[Bug fortran/88486] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3401

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88486 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88488] ICE in gfc_trans_array_constructor_subarray, at fortran/trans-array.c:1646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88488 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/87945] [9 Regression] ICE in var_element, at fortran/decl.c:281

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87945 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Not sure this is related, but I tried compiling ./gfortran.dg/pr87945_1.f90 > on an asan build of gcc trunk revision 267200 and got this: I think it is a duplicate of pr87881.

[Bug fortran/88536] [9 Regression] i686 testsuite errors for %re, %im, %len and %kind features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88536 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87881] gfortran.dg/inquiry_type_ref_(1.f08|3.f90) fail on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manfred99 at gmx dot ch --- Comme

[Bug fortran/87881] gfortran.dg/inquiry_type_ref_(1.f08|3.f90) fail on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881 --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Does this do it for you? Jakub's patch regtested cleanly. I'll test yours later this evening.

[Bug other/86656] Issues found with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656 Bug 86656 depends on bug 81531, which changed state. Bug 81531 Summary: Multiple Invalid reads seen by valgrind on an invalid test-case https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81531 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/81531] Multiple Invalid reads seen by valgrind on an invalid test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81531 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79524] [7/8/9 Regression] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fimplicit_none_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79524 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 81531 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/88552] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1120

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88552 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/87881] gfortran.dg/inquiry_type_ref_(1.f08|3.f90) fail on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881 --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres --- return true;; should be return true;

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 60122, which changed state. Bug 60122 Summary: Unexpected warning for uninitialised character variable https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60122 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/60122] Unexpected warning for uninitialised character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60122 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/56670] Allocatable-length character var causes bogus warning with -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fmartinez at gmv dot com --- Comm

[Bug fortran/88579] Calculating power of powers of two

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88579 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/79263] Several tests introduced in r244878 fail with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79263 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77703] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE on assignment to pointer function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77703 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- After r267379, the test in comment 4 gives a segfault at run time.

[Bug testsuite/80661] make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=g*" runs all the tests in gcc.dg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80661 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Le 23 déc. 2018 à 20:46, anlauf at gmx dot de a > écrit : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80661 > > Harald Anlauf changed: > > What|Removed |A

[Bug libstdc++/70694] 50 experimental/filesystem/* failures on x86_64-apple-darwin10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70694 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88511] passing allocatable character through two levels of procedure calls fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88511 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/88551] passing a portion of an array of a derived type that contains an allocatable component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88551 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/45513] BOZ kinds differently handled, F2008: BOZ in bit intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45513 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88624] [Coarray] Rejects allocatable coarray passed as a dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88624 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/82550] program using submodules fails to link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82550 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Works now on 8.2.1 and trunk (9.0). May I close this PR as FIXED?

[Bug target/81693] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr25967-*.c -O* execution test on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81693 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68356] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr68264.c -O* execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68356 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81210] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr68037-*.c -O* execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81210 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/88638] New: [9 Regression] FAIL: *string-format-1.* on darwin

Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: iains at gcc dot gnu.org, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-apple-darwin18 Target: x86_64-apple-darwin18

[Bug fortran/88632] [F08] function contained in module invisible to submodule unless declared public

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88632 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||link-failure Priority|P

[Bug target/65342] [7/8/9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_(un)?pack_1.f90 -O1 execution test on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r210201

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65342 --- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Is this still present on ppc?

[Bug target/52491] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52491 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug fortran/88653] Is this a compiler bug?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88653 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88658] New: [9 Regression] Intrinsic MAX1 returns a REAL result, should be INTEGER.

Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- PR14377 "Intrinsic MAX1 returns a REAL result, should be INTEGER"

[Bug fortran/88658] [9 Regression] Intrinsic MAX1 returns a REAL result, should be INTEGER.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88658 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/88653] Is this a compiler bug?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88653 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Note that I run the tests with the '-w -fno-sign-zero -std=legacy' options.

[Bug fortran/88649] runtime error: load of value 137971008, which is not a valid value for type 'gfc_intrinsic_op'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88649 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88669] Contiguous attribute wrongly rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88669 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48543] Collapse identical strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48543 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/88685] [8/9 regression] pointer class array argument indexing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88685 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug target/65342] [7/8/9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_(un)?pack_1.f90 -O1 execution test on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r210201

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65342 --- Comment #23 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Still present, see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2019-01/msg00318.html.

[Bug target/60732] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-7.C -std=* scan-assembler _Z3fooDv*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60732 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/52491] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52491 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88653] Is this a compiler bug?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88653 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Didn't someone just do some work on MAX1? pr88658, fix at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-01/msg6.html.

[Bug target/88638] [9 Regression] FAIL: *string-format-1.* on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88638 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I submitted the patch below for review. Dominique, if you have > an opportunity to test it on Darwin and let me know if there are > any outstanding problems that would be great. > https://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug fortran/88653] Is this a compiler bug?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88653 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- It seems that the problem comes from your installation. Did you build gfortran yourself or did you get it from some binary distribution? If the later, from where? Did you report the problem to them?

[Bug libgomp/88707] New: Random failures of libgomp.c++/task-reduction-(8|10).C on x86_64-apple-darwin18

: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: iains at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-apple-darwin18

[Bug target/60563] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/sync-4.C on *-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 85855, which changed state. Bug 85855 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] (Maybe) uninitialized descriptor fields of an allocatable array component of a function result https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85855

[Bug fortran/77504] "is used uninitialized" with allocatable string and array constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com --

[Bug fortran/85855] [7/8/9 Regression] (Maybe) uninitialized descriptor fields of an allocatable array component of a function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85855 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88710] [F08] Sourced allocation of array fails, yielding wrong bounds and result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88710 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/88711] [regression 9.0] scan-ipa-dump inline "Inlined tp_sum/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88711 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88710] [F08] Sourced allocation of array fails, yielding wrong bounds and result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88710 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > For what it's worth, I have compiled the code also with '-Wall' > and '-Warray-bounds' but both these options didn't give any warning. The relevant option is -fcheck=bounds.

[Bug fortran/88047] [9 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_vtab, at fortran/class.c:2843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88047 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > A related test case, also changed between 20180909 and 20180916 : Confirmed at r264350, not fixed by the patch in comment 2, but by the patch in comment 3. Janus, could please you figure out why cl

[Bug fortran/88735] Nested assignment triggers call of final method for right hand side

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88735 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug ipa/88711] [9 Regression] scan-ipa-dump inline "Inlined tp_sum/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88711 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com

[Bug testsuite/88743] [9 regression] test case gfortran.dg/pr79966.f90 fails starting with r267600

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88743 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88748] IS_CONTIGUOUS mishandles arrays of derived type components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88748 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88750] [9.0 regression] runtime error in statically linked binaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88750 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88653] Is this a compiler bug?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88653 --- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Apparently, this is some kind of cygwin problem. Did you report the problem to cygwin?

[Bug libfortran/88776] Namelist read from stdin: loss of data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88776 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50410] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in record_reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 --- Comment #32 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Some of the tests in this PR are fixed by the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-01/msg00065.html

[Bug fortran/88768] Derived type io in conjunction with allocatable component and recursion fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88768 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88688] Incorrect association in SELECT TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88688 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/88044] [9 regression] gfortran.dg/transfer_intrinsic_3.f90 hangs after r266171

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/88044] [9 regression] gfortran.dg/transfer_intrinsic_3.f90 hangs after r266171

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I tried both (1) and (2) and the test case does not hang. Could you please try '0, 1', '1, 2', and '0, 2'?

[Bug fortran/88803] gfortran documentation warning: '.' or ',' must follow @xref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88803 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

<    14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   >