[Bug fortran/94090] ICE on mismatched interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94090 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Confirmed at least down to gfortran 7. Down to gfortran 5.

[Bug fortran/58200] Option fcheck is misleadingly located in option descriptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|dominiq at lps dot ens.fr |unassigned at gc

[Bug fortran/84594] Warning: Use of the NUMERIC_STORAGE_SIZE named constant from intrinsic module ISO_FORTRAN_ENV at (1) is incompatible with option -fdefault-integer-8

miniq at lps dot ens.fr |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Unassigning myself.

[Bug fortran/58200] Option fcheck is misleadingly located in option descriptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

miniq at lps dot ens.fr |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Unassigning myself.

[Bug fortran/89938] inconsistent wording regarding assumed shape

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89938 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|dominiq at lps dot ens.fr |unassigned at gc

[Bug fortran/53077] replace "Illegal preprocessor directive" message with "Ignoring preprocessor directive at %C. Use -cpp to enable the C preprocessor" (a patch by Tobias included)

miniq at lps dot ens.fr |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Unassigning myself.

[Bug fortran/69101] [F03] IEEE_SELECTED_REAL_KIND is not generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug fortran/93563] Wrong code makes the compiler hang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93563 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Gfortran 6.5 gives the error: class(TreeNode_t), dimension(:), allocatable :: children 1 Error: Derived type at (1) has not been previously de

[Bug fortran/93924] ICE in gfc_class_len_get at trans_expr.c:231 with function returning a procedure pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93924 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Up to revion r242391 I get the error: function selector() result(f) 1 Error: CLASS variable 'f' at (1) must be dummy, allocatable or pointer pr93924.f90:29:19:

[Bug fortran/94109] Memory leak introduced in 8.3.0->8.3.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94109 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- For the record: % gfc pr94361.f90 -fanalyzer pr94361.f90:24:0: 24 | end subroutine | Warning: leak of 'test.t.dat.data' [CWE-401] [-Wanalyzer-malloc-leak] 'leaker': events 1-11 |

[Bug fortran/80174] [meta-bug] Fortran lto issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80174 Bug 80174 depends on bug 68358, which changed state. Bug 68358 Summary: Some tests in gfortran.dg fail when compiled with '-g -flto' and Xcode 7 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358 What|Removed |

[Bug fortran/68358] Some tests in gfortran.dg fail when compiled with '-g -flto' and Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/95509] [11 regression] gfortran.dg/spellcheck-operator.f90 fails after r11-875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95509 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/95398] ICE on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95398 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/95533] New: Spurious(?) warning "writing 2 bytes into a region of size 0" with -O(2|3) -fwhole-program -flto

NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- % gfc /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/g

[Bug testsuite/95538] New: Unfinished cleanup in the test suite

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr Target Milestone: --- Looking at the content gcc/testsuite I see gcc/testsuite/gfortran: binding_label_tests_10.mod gfortran.log inline_matmul_14.ltrans0.ltrans.235t.optimizedprocs.mod

[Bug fortran/95546] Random Fortran test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95546 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I have seen that too with -j8. AFAICT the problem is that the test expects there is no file 'test.dat'.

[Bug testsuite/95546] Random Fortran test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95546 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I am curious, did this just start happening or is it a long time issue just > reported. The test is quite old: Feb 18 2018. I did not see any failure for it until now (one instance).

[Bug testsuite/95577] New: Tcl error with testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp on darwin

Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: iains at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-apple-darwin* Target: x86_64-apple-darwin

[Bug fortran/95584] ICE in generic_correspondence, at fortran/interface.c:1260

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95584 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95586] ICE in gfc_validate_kind, at fortran/trans-types.c:773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95586 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-08 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/95587] ICE in gfc_target_encode_expr, at fortran/target-memory.c:362

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95587 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/95541] [PDT] ICE in gfc_get_dataptr_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:6909

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95541 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in |[PDT] ICE in |g

[Bug fortran/95542] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95542 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/93624] Memory leak with allocatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93624 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95446] False positive for optional arguments of elemental procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95446 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/95375] ICE in add_use_op, Error: mismatching comparison operand types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95375 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/95342] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_subroutine, at fortran/decl.c:7913

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95342 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/95215] [OMP] internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14079

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95215 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/95138] ICE on transfer to unlimited polymorphic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95138 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/94377] Won't compile when deallocating a parameterized derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94377 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95613] ICE in main_block_label, at tree-cfg.c:1455

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95613 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95614] ICE in build_field, at fortran/trans-common.c:301

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95614 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-09 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/95612] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_check_pointer_assign, at fortran/expr.c:4274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95612 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/95640] gfortran ieee_selected_real_kind returns 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95640 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95644] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95647] operator(.eq.) and operator(==) treated differently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95647 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/95690] [11 Regression] ICE in set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos, at emit-rtl.c:2092

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95690 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/95718] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Wrong pointer associated status without initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95718 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.0, 6.5.0, 7.4.0,

[Bug fortran/95718] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Wrong pointer associated status without initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95718 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The change occurred between revisions r226476 (2015-08-02, OK) and r227252 (2015-08-27, wrong). No idea about how this translates to git!-(

[Bug fortran/95709] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_code, at fortran/resolve.c:11807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95709 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95710] ICE in gfc_type_is_extensible, at fortran/resolve.c:8848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95710 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-17 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/50410] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in record_reference, pointer variable in data statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 --- Comment #41 from Dominique d'Humieres --- In my working tree I had the following patch --- /opt/gcc/_clean-svn//gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c 2020-01-05 11:44:35.0 +0100 +++ /opt/gcc/work-cvs/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c 2020-01-05 11:

[Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Not seen in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2020-June/564061.html

[Bug testsuite/95577] Tcl error with testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Proposed fix at > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/548730.html Seems to work for me. Thanks!

[Bug fortran/95837] derived-type components of character kind=4 – wrong code with component access (kind=4 ignored)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/95812] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver since r10-2114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug gcov-profile/95847] Internal error when processing pFUnit generated files with --coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95847 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/95850] [11 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90 fails starting with r11-r11-1595

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95850 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/95880] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_type, at fortran/symbol.c:2030

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95880 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/95979] [10/11 Regression] ICE in get_kind, at fortran/simplify.c:129

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95979 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I don't see the ICE on a standard GCC11, but its instrumented version gives ../../work/gcc/fortran/simplify.c:127:10: runtime error: load of value 4294967295, which is not a valid value for type 'expr

[Bug fortran/95978] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_data, at fortran/decl.c:731

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95978 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-29 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/96018] Optimization issue with external HDF5 library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/95109] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/gomp/target1.f90 after r11-349

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95109 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Reduced testcase: ! { dg-do compile } module target1 contains subroutine foo (n, o, p, q, r, pp) integer :: n, o, p, q, r, s, i, j integer :: a (2:o) integer, pointer :: pp !$omp targ

[Bug fortran/96024] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in mio_name_expr_t, at fortran/module.c:2159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-01 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/96025] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expr_check_typed_help, at fortran/expr.c:5437

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96025 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/52622] heap-use-after-free with instrumented compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #15 from Dominiqu

[Bug fortran/96033] error: The Fortran compiler gfortran will not compile files that call the same routine with arguments of different types.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96033 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONF

[Bug fortran/96033] error: The Fortran compiler gfortran will not compile files that call the same routine with arguments of different types.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96033 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- You can find a quite long discussion about legacy at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/Ed8Mccy9zo8

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/96025] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expr_check_typed_help, at fortran/expr.c:5437

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96025 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This fixes the ICE. Confirmed, with the patch I get Error: Expression at (1) must be of INTEGER type, found CHARACTER

[Bug fortran/96024] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in mio_name_expr_t, at fortran/module.c:2159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The patch in PR 95025 fixes this issue. The patch fixes the ICE, but I get the cryptic error f951: Fatal Error: Writing module 'm' at line 15 column 14: Bad type in constant expression compilation

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- >From several runs frame #0: 0x0001000f11ed f951`gfc_free_namespace(gfc_namespace*) [inlined] free_uop_tree(uop_tree=0x00ce) at symbol.c:3881:17 frame #0: 0x0001000f11ed f9

[Bug fortran/96071] ICE in matching_typebound_op, at fortran/interface.c:4233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96071 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/96018] [9/10/11 Regression] Optimization issue with external HDF5 library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : AFAICT the patch fixes the ICE for z2.f90, but not for z1.f90. > Related (and presumably also pr86551) : The patch seems to also fix the ICEs

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I attached a brute-force patch that makes gfortran reject z1.f90 > without ICEing. > > Can you confirm this, or is there possibly something left to handle? Confirmed on preliminary tests (pr86551),

[Bug fortran/96071] ICE in matching_typebound_op, at fortran/interface.c:4233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96071 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/92967] ICE in matching_typebound_op, at fortran/interface.c:4214

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92967 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 96071 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Confirmed on preliminary tests (pr86551), full tests in progress: results > tomorrow). Regtested without regression.

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Tests finished, the patch fixes both pr86551 and pr95980, but not more AFAICT. > That was on Darwin, right? Yes

[Bug fortran/96085] ICE in gfc_finish_var_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96085 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Reduced test (provided t.mod exists) submodule (t) ts contains module procedure bp(s) ! end procedure bp end submodule ts end pr93423_red.f90:5:19: 5 | module procedure bp(s) |

[Bug fortran/95947] PACK intrinsic returns blank strings when an allocatable character array with allocatable length is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95947 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-07 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/96099] ICE in gfc_validate_kind, at fortran/trans-types.c:773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96099 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Confirmed before r11-1337, but r11-1810 (instrumented) and r11-1864 (+patches) do not give the ICE.

[Bug fortran/96099] ICE in gfc_validate_kind, at fortran/trans-types.c:773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96099 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-07 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/96100] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96100 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/96069] -ffile-prefix-map does not affect print in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-08 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/96047] Bogus unitialized warning for derived type with allocatable components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96047 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/96030] AArch64: Add an option to control 64bits simdclone of math functions for fortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96030 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |target --- Comment #4 from Domini

[Bug fortran/92702] [F2008] (and hence [F2018]) Implement VALUE support for arrays + deferred-length parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92702 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-08 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/95868] Derived-type deferred-length character component handling broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95868 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/95682] [9/10/11 Regression] Default assignment fails with allocatable array of deferred-length strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95682 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/94975] Address sanitizations show heap-buffer-overflow with class(*) allocated to character on assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94975 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/95998] New: gfc_typename use of static memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95998 Bug ID: 95998 Summary: gfc_typename use of static memory Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: WAITING Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug libfortran/95293] Fortran not passing array by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95293 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95196] Assumed-rank incorrect array bounds inside select rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95196 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/94289] Assumed-rank array bounds resuscitate on the second call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94289 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/96069] -ffile-prefix-map does not affect print in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |preprocessor --- Comment #3 from

[Bug preprocessor/96069] -ffile-prefix-map does not affect print in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Also note that I've already submitted patches to fix this though > I haven't got a reply yet. Where did you submit the patches?

[Bug preprocessor/96069] -ffile-prefix-map does not affect print in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- If you need to get the gfortran developers attention, you must submit your patch to fort...@gcc.gnu.org.

[Bug fortran/96122] Segfault when using finalizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96122 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-11 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/93671] gfortran 8-10 ICE on intrinsic assignment to allocatable derived-type component of coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93671 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/94408] Spurious error: ‘rw_nl_grid’ must be a module procedure or an external procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94408 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/95998] gfc_typename use of static memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95998 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > If we ever have three occurences of gfc_typename in a function list, > like > > foo (gfc_typename(a), gfc_typename(b), gfc_typename(c)); > > we will get the wrong result for the third one. We will

[Bug fortran/93948] Surprising option processing of -fdec and -fdec-math in combination with -std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93948 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-12 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libfortran/93727] Fortran 2018: EX edit descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-12 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/93733] F2008: G0.d output editing for integer/logical/character data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93733 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >