https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> And another, as reported at
> https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/84op5c/usability_improvements_in_gcc_8/
> dvtl76x/
>
> > const auto s = strlen("test");
> > w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5)
> Note to self: need to look at Elm.
http://elm-lang.org/blog/compiler-errors-for-humans
http://elm-lang.org/blog/compilers-as-assistants
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6)
[...]
> We should also underline the param, or the "const" token.
(actually, if the member function or param is 'const', it's not a problem, I
think. -ENOCOFFEE)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
A similar sentiment to comment #1:
https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/84op5c/usability_improvements_in_gcc_8/dvu7n5e/
> I find that "did you forget to '#include" is kind of personal message
> and it's quit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84943
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Consider:
class foo
{
public:
double get_ratio() const { return m_ratio; }
private:
double m_ratio;
};
void test(foo
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Given this:
class foo
{
public:
double get_ratio() const { return m_ratio; }
private:
double m_ratio
||2018-03-20
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
[confirmed; mine]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84994
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Missing accessor hint for |Missing accessor hint for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85004
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84892
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84994
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84892
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84892
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Mar 21 13:09:09 2018
New Revision: 258716
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258716&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++: show private field accessor hints for const accesses (PR c++/84892
D
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
We provide fix-it hints for the most common "std::" names:
void f() {
std::cout <&
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Another one, affecting C++ only:
void f() {
printf("test");
}
: In function 'void f()':
:2:5: error: 'printf' was not declared in this scope
printf("test");
^~
:2:5: note: suggested altern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84994
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Mar 21 18:21:39 2018
New Revision: 258731
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258731&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++: show private field accessor hints with -g and optimization (PR c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84994
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84994
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82967
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Another one, from https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82967#c1
#include
void test (float pf, float inff)
{
assert (pf == inff);
}
: In function 'test':
:5:3: warning: implicit declaration of f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
From PR 84896:
gcc 8 currently emits the following for:
std::pair foo;
error: 'pair' in namespace 'std' does not name a template type
std::pair foo;
^~~~
We ought to suggest including for this,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
*** Bug 84896 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84896
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85021
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84183
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Andre Pribil from comment #2)
Thanks. Sounds like this might be an ld bug then.
Thomas: do you know which version of binutils you were using?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63392
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70618
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70924
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In gcc 8, the C++ FE underlines some bogus arguments to function calls, as of
r256448.
However we're missing some. Given:
void callee (in
||2018-03-28
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
In build_new_function_call, we have:
cand = perform_overload_resolution (fn, *args
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83319
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85110
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from David Malcol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84993
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85110
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Mar 29 14:43:01 2018
New Revision: 258957
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258957&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
More underlining of bad arguments (PR c++/85110)
As of r256448, the C+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Mar 29 20:43:48 2018
New Revision: 258966
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
More #include suggestions (PR c++/84269)
PR c++/84269 reports a numbe
mponent: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 43847
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43847&action=edit
Reproducer
The downstream bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85215
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Started somewhere between r258751 (unaffected) and r258755 (affected)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85215
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
|NEW
Last reconfirmed||2018-04-05
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85210
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed.
On gcc-7-branch, with checking enabled, this is:
test.cc:5:8: internal compiler error: tree check: expected var_decl, have
parm_decl in cp_finish_decomp, at cp/decl.c:7354
7454 SET_DECL
||2018-04-05
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|ICE with broken structured
||2018-04-05
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|ICE with structured binding |[7/8/ Regression] ICE with
|of a forward declared
||2018-04-05
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|ICE with array as template |[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with
|variable|array as template variable
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85021
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Apr 6 15:46:04 2018
New Revision: 259179
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259179&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++: suggest missing headers for implicit use of "std" (PR c++/85021)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85021
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85260
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
--- Comment #13 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Apr 6 17:36:33 2018
New Revision: 259184
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259184&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++: more std header hints; filter on C++ dialect (PR c++/84269)
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85110
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-04/msg00342.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85948
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56856
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jg at jguk dot org
--- Comment #9 from D
|ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg00269.html
gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
I'm looking at this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56856
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Oct 5 19:02:17 2018
New Revision: 264887
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264887&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Support string locations for C++ in -Wformat (PR c++/56856)
-Wformat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
Bug 52952 depends on bug 56856, which changed state.
Bug 56856 Summary: -Wformat warnings don't show location *within* format string
in C++ FE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56856
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56856
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #52 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #51)
> 1. C++ does not work
C++ should be fixed for gcc 9 by r264887.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #53 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #51)
> 2. Locations within strings expanded from a macro
(2) should also be fixed for gcc 9 by r264887:
/tmp/foo.c: In function ‘foo’:
/tmp/foo.c:2:25: warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87562
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
linemap_position_for_line_and_column(line_maps*, line_map_ordinary const*,
unsigned int, unsigned int) at libcpp/line-map.c:848
is:
linemap_assert (ORDINARY_MAP_STARTING_LINE_NUMBER (ord_map) <= line);
I w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84993
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Oct 11 19:03:33 2018
New Revision: 265056
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265056&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++: suggestions for misspelled private members (PR c++/84993)
PR c++/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84993
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2018-10-17
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Renlin Li from comment #2)
> I checked that, the ICE starts from r264887.
Tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87562
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87630
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87643
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87562
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87562
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Oct 18 15:44:39 2018
New Revision: 265271
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265271&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE in substring-handling building 502.gcc_r (PR 87562)
In r264887
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87562
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed; thanks. I'm able to reproduce this and am working on reducing it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87721
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Reduced reproducer:
# define DBG_ERROR(dbg_logger, format, args...) if (1){\
char dbg_buffer[256]; \
__builtin_snprintf(dbg_buffer, sizeof(dbg_buffer)-1,\
__FILE__":%5d: " format , __LINE__ , ## args)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87757
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87757
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
prior to that gimplify.c code, the location of the argument is correctly set,
as:
t.c:8:31: note:
8 | __builtin_sprintf (e, "%s", &a[0]);
| ^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87757
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Aldy: do you remember why the arguments need to have the same location as the
call itself?
The first case works because during gimplify_arg it's wrapped in a NOP_EXPR
which is casting from char[] to char *,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56856
--- Comment #13 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Oct 29 23:44:10 2018
New Revision: 265609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265609&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Folding and check_function_arguments
This patch eliminates the argloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87562
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Oct 29 23:58:34 2018
New Revision: 265611
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265611&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE in get_substring_ranges_for_loc on __FILE__ (PR c++/87721)
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87721
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Oct 29 23:58:34 2018
New Revision: 265611
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265611&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE in get_substring_ranges_for_loc on __FILE__ (PR c++/87721)
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87721
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2018-11-05
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch for C++ part of this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg00303
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate followup patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg00304.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43064
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg00304.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86395
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86395
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Nov 8 15:38:30 2018
New Revision: 265920
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265920&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
ipa-inline.c/tree-inline.c: port from fprintf to dump API (PR ipa/86395
||2018-11-09
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Sorry about that. Confirmed; I'm working on a fix.
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg00802.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87955
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #24 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch for JSON output:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg01038.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87955
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Nov 13 15:59:57 2018
New Revision: 266079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266079&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE with -fopt-info-inline (PR ipa/87955)
PR ipa/87955 reports a p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87955
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed, though for some reason I needed to add -floop-parallelize-all to the
flags in comment #0 to trigger it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Actually, I'm still not able to reproduce this, but the fix seems obvious; am
working on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Nov 15 14:01:29 2018
New Revision: 266184
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266184&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
graphite: add missing dump_enabled_p checks (PR tree-optimization/88015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #6 from David Malcol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19165
--- Comment #25 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Nov 15 14:32:41 2018
New Revision: 266186
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266186&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Machine-readable diagnostic output (PR other/19165)
This patch implem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19165
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88036
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks!
901 - 1000 of 3376 matches
Mail list logo
