https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61631
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Trevor Saunders from comment #2)
> > r211936 PASS
> > [r211937..r211985) not build with --enable-checking=fold due PR61598
> > r211985 FAIL
>
> I think if you apply r211985 directly on top
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61631
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz
--- Comment
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
$ cat au.ii
template class A {
A:
0
};
A a;
$ /usr/local/gcc_current/bin/g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/gcc_current/bin/g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc_current
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
r212219 FAIL
r212191 PASS
$ /usr/local/gcc_current/bin/g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/gcc_current/bin/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61671
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
class A {
public:
virtual int GetNilString();
};
class B {
public:
B(A *p1) { p1->GetNilString(); }
};
template class F : B {
public:
F(int) : B(StringTraits::GetDefaultManager()) {}
};
class CD
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
r212098 PASS
r212191 FAIL
r212258 FAIL
$ ~/bin/gcc_212191_wo_fold/bin/g++ -c -fpreprocessed -O n.ii
$ ~/bin/gcc_212191_wo_fold/bin/g++ -c -fpreprocessed -O2 n.ii
n.ii: In destructor 'virtual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61631
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
r212556 FAIL
r212517 PASS
~/src/gcc_current/configure --enable-checking=fold --disable-multilib
make
[...]
make[3]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61809
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61809
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> Are you sure that r212549 fails? I'ld rather suspect a typo in r212550,
> i.e., DECL_ARGUMENT instead of DECL_ARGUMENT_FLD.
Sorry, err in err.messag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61809
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> Are you sure that r212549 fails? I'ld rather suspect a typo in r212550,
> i.e., DECL_ARGUMENT instead of DECL_ARGUMENT_FLD.
Oh, for r212549 and r212
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61809
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
r213523, r213529 FAIL
r213316 PASS
~/src/gcc_r213529/configure --enable
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
r215401 PASS
r215427, r215444 FAIL
Fedora 20 / x86_64
$ configure --enable-checking=fold
$ make
[...]
/home/dimhen/build/gcc_current/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63325
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r223920 PASS
r224193 FAIL
gcc -fpreprocessed -Werror -Wall -O2 -c x.i PASS
gcc -fpreprocessed -Werror -Wall -O3 -c x.i FAIL
$ cat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66449
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
start FAIL for me : r224020
configure as
$ ~/src/gcc_r224020/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current --enable-static
--enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-plugin
--disable-l
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66452
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r224136 PASS
r224161 FAIL (stage1 compiler due broken bootstrap)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
>
> Where does this obfuscated 'return *(e->pu)' come from?
If I remove aggregate then there are no warning.
i.e. this code produce no warning
mytype f(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66449
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to amker from comment #3)
> Author: amker
> Date: Tue Jun 23 02:27:49 2015
> New Revision: 224769
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224769&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
>
> PR tree-o
--- Comment #5 from dimhen at gmail dot com 2010-07-18 12:40 ---
'functions as designed'
--
dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #24 from dimhen at gmail dot com 2010-07-18 12:56 ---
is this the same problem? -- 'i*2 < 35' can't overflow
void
foo(char *ptr, unsigned size)
{
unsigned i;
for(i=0; i*2 < size && i*2 < 35; i++ ) {
*ptr++ = 0;
}
}
# gcc
nedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dimhen at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-redhat-linux
GCC host triplet: i686-redhat-linux
GCC target triplet: i686-redhat-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45649
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45649
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2010-10-02
16:38:02 UTC ---
gcc version 4.6.0 20101002 (experimental) [trunk revision 164903] (GCC)
FAIL too
undefined symbol
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dimhen at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-redhat-
--- Comment #1 from dimhen at gmail dot com 2010-06-14 10:19 ---
simplified testcase FAIl with -O[23]
namespace FOO {
template
class A
{
public:
void Enum();
virtual void OnProv() = 0;
virtual ~A() { }
};
typedef A B;
template
void A::Enum ()
{
OnProv
ot;";'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dimhen at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-redhat-lin
--- Comment #2 from dimhen at gmail dot com 2010-06-20 07:32 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Well...
1) so, gcc miss 'set-but-not-used' warning in testcase?
2) in testcase there are no more code to which 'x' may be inlined. Yes?
3) change test to
static const char x[
with/without typedef
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dimhen at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dimhen at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35956
--- Comment #2 from dimhen at gmail dot com 2008-04-16 08:19 ---
Function according C/C++ specs
--
dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from dimhen at gmail dot com 2008-04-17 05:05 ---
i reproduce err with #134344.
1. pre condition
'svnversion -n' print 134340
'gcc -v' print 134340
'g++ -v' print 134339
2. gcc_update. Update to #134344. No files has changed.
3. make in
--- Comment #3 from dimhen at gmail dot com 2008-04-27 10:26 ---
trunk rev.#134722 has no bug
--
dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r239064 PASS
r239176 FAIL
Fedora24/x86_6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72821
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r239190 FAIL
r239091 FAIL
r239090 PASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72821
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94195
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r11-6442 PASS
r11-6475 FAIL
$ cat x.i
char a[2];
void c()
{
int b;
a[1] = b >> 8;
a[0] = b;
}
// creduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98568
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
$ ~/arch-gcc/r11-6475/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/dimhen/arch-gcc/r11-6475/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/dimhen/arch-gcc/r11-6475/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.0
: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc version 11.0.0 20210104 (experimental) [master revision
7f2b7317566:9da1da01aec:39bd65faee3bafe2dc067e5fedb5079896551a8a] (GCC)
r11-6442 PASS
gcc version 11.0.0 20210108
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93695
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94713
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95000
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
gcc version 11.0.0 20210210 (experimental) [master revision
bd0e37f68a3:deed5164277:72932511053596091ad291539022b51d9f2ba418]
PASS for me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96894
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r12-6649 PASS
r12-6793 FAIL
r12-7557 FAIL
$ $ cat y.i
extern void g();
struct a {
} b(int c, int d) {
struct a *e = 0;
int f;
if (c & 1 || !(c & 2))
r
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at
gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r12-7608 FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104934
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> And the bug is?
> The S class doesn't have the key method defined, so some other TU needs to
> define it and thus provide the vtable and rtti for it.
> Wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77721
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Sounds like gcc-8.0.1 PASS for me
r257061 FAIL
r258034 PASS
r12-5546 PASS
$ ~/arch-gcc/SVN/gcc_258034/bin/gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180227 (experimental) [trunk revision 258034]
$ ~/arch-gcc/SV
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90347
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r12-5761 PASS for me
r12-5648 FAIL
r12-5761 PASS
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r12-3456 PASS
r12-3545 FAIL
$ cat x.i
static int GetHashParam_HP_OPAQUEBLOB_pdwDataLen = 0;
void *memcpy(void *, const void *, unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102797
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r12-4256 PASS
r12- FAIL
$ cat x.ii
struct b {
b(int);
};
void d() {
int c = 1;
do
try {
b a = 1;
while (1) {
c++;
a = 1;
}
} catch (...) {
}
w
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r12-4256 FAST
r12- SLOW
g++ -fpreprocessed -std=c++98 -O2 --param max-jump-thread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86899
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r13-1213 PASS for me
r13-1164 FAIL for me
301 - 354 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
