[Bug c++/38477] New: [strict-aliasing] warning message contains compiler-generated symbols

2008-12-10 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Summary: [strict-aliasing] warning message contains compiler- generated symbols Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org Repo

[Bug middle-end/39983] New: ICE: type mismatch in address expression

2009-04-30 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
ty: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dimhen at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39983

[Bug tree-optimization/15348] [tree-ssa] Convert (x < 0) || (y < 0) into (x | y) < 0.

2020-03-11 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com

[Bug bootstrap/94961] New: [11 regression] internal compiler error: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4002

2020-05-05 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- r11-46 PASS r11-117 FAIL configure --enable-checking=yes,df --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --disable-multilib make

[Bug bootstrap/94961] [11 Regression] ICE in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4002 since r11-87-gd44f14ccef831d90feb57fab56bc3389d543ffdd

2020-05-08 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94961 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r11-196 PASS for me. Thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/95223] New: [11 regression] hash table checking failed: equal operator returns true for a pair of values with a different hash value

2020-05-19 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- r11-459 PASS r11-495 FAIL $ cat x.cpp struct s { } a

[Bug c++/95223] [11 regression] hash table checking failed: equal operator returns true for a pair of values with a different hash value

2020-05-20 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95223 --- Comment #9 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #8) > Thanks for the reports. This should now hopefully be fixed with r11-522. r11-526 PASS for me. Thanks

[Bug tree-optimization/95761] New: [11 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp verify_ssa failed

2020-06-19 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- r11-1451 PASS r11-1512 FAIL `gcc -O2' PASS $ gcc -O3 -c x_1.i x_1.i: In function 'k': x_1.i:10:6: error: defini

[Bug tree-optimization/95761] [11 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp verify_ssa failed

2020-06-19 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95761 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r11-1553 PASS original testcase for me. And FAIL similar test with the same stack. $ cat x_2.i typedef int a[10]; typedef struct { a b; a c; a d; } e; e j; void k() { int *h = j.c, *f = j.d, *g

[Bug tree-optimization/95761] [11 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp verify_ssa failed

2020-06-22 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95761 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r11-1582 PASS for me x_2.i and original (non-reduced) compilation

[Bug tree-optimization/95761] [11 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp verify_ssa failed

2020-06-23 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95761 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7) > I see the test-cases fixed. > Can you still reproduce that? r11-1553 PASS x_1.i for me and FAIL unreduced one. r11-1582 PASS x_1.i, x_2.i for me and PASS un

[Bug c/97087] New: [11 regression] 70x slow -O3

2020-09-17 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 49234 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49234&action=edit -O3 slowdown 70x gcc -O3 -c y.i r11-3192 0.06s r11-3210 3.45s r11-3234 3.61s gcc -O2 -c y.i r

[Bug c/97087] [11 regression] 70x slow -O3

2020-09-17 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97087 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- Created attachment 49235 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49235&action=edit unreduced file preprocessed openssl-1.1.0 crypto/blake2/blake2s.c compilition aborted after ~1h

[Bug bootstrap/97105] New: [11 regression] dumpfile.c:169:33: error: storage size of 'optgroup_options' isn't known

2020-09-18 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
us: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- r11-3264 PASS r11-3279 FAIL $ configure --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c+

[Bug debug/91929] missing inline subroutine information in build using sin/cos

2019-10-18 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com

[Bug debug/91929] missing inline subroutine information in build using sin/cos

2019-10-21 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929 --- Comment #14 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #13) > On Fri, 18 Oct 2019, dimhen at gmail dot com wrote: > I guess > previously the uninit pass didn't emit warnings for the load >

[Bug c/92205] ice in vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1688

2019-10-24 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92205 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com

[Bug bootstrap/92240] New: [10 regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:3883

2019-10-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- r277460 PASS r277485 FAIL gcc_current/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current --enable-checking=yes,df,fold,rtl,extra --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --disable

[Bug bootstrap/92240] [10 regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:3883

2019-10-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- simplified configure' call configure --enable-checking=yes --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib --with-isl make /home/dimhen/build/gcc_current/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/dimhen/build/gcc_current/

[Bug bootstrap/92240] [10 regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:3883

2019-10-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug c/92241] ice in vect_mark_pattern_st mts, at tree-vect-patterns.c:5175

2019-10-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92241 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com

[Bug ipa/92242] New: [10 regression] LTO ICE in ipa_get_cs_argument_count ipa-prop.h:598

2019-10-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- r277460 PASS r277486 FAIL I'll try creduce it / proprietary codebase, 50+ files LTO l

[Bug ipa/92242] [10 regression] LTO ICE in ipa_get_cs_argument_count ipa-prop.h:598

2019-10-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- over reduced but still ICE $ cat x.i unsigned foo(int a) { if (a) return 0; } $ cat y.i unsigned foo(); void bar() { foo(); } $ cat libso.ver { global: bar; local: *; }; $ gcc -O2 -flto -c x

[Bug ipa/92242] [10 regression] LTO ICE in ipa_get_cs_argument_count ipa-prop.h:598

2019-10-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- correctly reduced testcase $ cat x.i unsigned foo(int a) { if (a) return 0; return 1; } $ cat y.i unsigned foo(int); int bar() { foo(0); return 0; } $ cat libso.ver { global: bar; local:

[Bug ipa/92240] [10 regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:3883

2019-10-28 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Happends during in-tree build of ISL. Did you do the setup with > ./contrib/download_prerequesites? Yes, I setup with ./contrib/download_prerequesites I

[Bug ipa/92251] [10 regression] SEGV in ipa_get_cs_argument_count

2019-10-28 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92251 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com

[Bug ipa/92242] [10 regression] LTO ICE in ipa_get_cs_argument_count ipa-prop.h:598

2019-10-28 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r277504 PASS for me. Thank you

[Bug ipa/92254] New: [10 regression] ICE LTO in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:2000

2019-10-28 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- r277460 PASS r277504 FAIL Fedora 31 x86_64 gcc -shared -fPIC -DPIC -flto [40+ files

[Bug ipa/92254] [10 regression] ICE LTO in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:2000

2019-10-28 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92254 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- $ cat a.i typedef unsigned (*c)(void *, void *); typedef struct { c d; } e; unsigned bar(void *, void *); unsigned baz(void *, void *); static const e f[] = {{bar}, {baz}}; const e *foo() { retu

[Bug ipa/92278] New: [10 regression] LTO ICE ipa_get_ith_polymorhic_call_context ipa-prop.h:616

2019-10-30 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- r277460 PASS r277486 FAIL as PR92242 r277504 FAIL r277576 FAIL $ cat a.i typedef

[Bug ipa/92278] [10 regression] LTO ICE ipa_get_ith_polymorhic_call_context ipa-prop.h:616

2019-10-30 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92278 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r277625 PASS for me for testcase from c#0 and for original problem. Thank you

[Bug ipa/92254] [10 regression] ICE LTO in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:2000

2019-10-30 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92254 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- very strange r277625 FAIL for me for testcase from c#1 and for original problem

[Bug ipa/92254] [10 regression] ICE LTO in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:2000

2019-10-30 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92254 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r277655 PASS for me: testcase and original case. Thank You

[Bug bootstrap/92314] New: [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

2019-11-01 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
us: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- r277655 PASS r277686 FAIL sounds like stage 1 issue? configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current --

[Bug bootstrap/92314] [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

2019-11-01 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- I use system compiler for bootstrap: gcc9/Fedora31 Did I understood you correctly: I need offloading compiler installed after r277662 if I say '--enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none' ? so invalid PR?

[Bug bootstrap/92314] [10 regression] missing omp-device-properties', needed by 's-omp-device-properties-h'

2019-11-01 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92314 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- Thank for clarification. Sorry for noise

[Bug middle-end/91195] [10 regression] incorrect may be used uninitialized smw (272711, 273474]

2019-11-20 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91195 --- Comment #11 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r278496 fix my original problem. Thank you

[Bug ipa/92809] New: [10 regression] error: calls_comdat_local is set outside of a comdat group

2019-12-04 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- r278936 PASS r278958 FAIL Maybe dup PR86905? $ $ cat x.ii struct a { int operator

[Bug c++/39751] ICE in cp_lexer_new_from_tokens, at cp/parser.c:342

2019-12-04 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751 --- Comment #11 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- Original test case from c#0 crash in trunk gcc version 10.0.0 20191204 (experimental) [trunk revision 278972] (GCC) $ g++ -fpreprocessed -fsyntax-only a.ii a.ii:5:1: error: types may not be defined i

[Bug bootstrap/93074] New: [10 regression] build FAIL with --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none

2019-12-25 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- r279700 PASS r279735 FAIL Fedora 31 x86_64 configure --disable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none make [...] libtool

[Bug bootstrap/93074] [10 regression] build FAIL with --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none

2019-12-26 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93074 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > According to > https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-driver-api/group__CUDA__DEVICE.html > > cuDeviceGetName exists. > Maybe F31 has an older version of Cuda i

[Bug ipa/92240] [10 regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:3883

2020-01-14 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > @Dmitry: Can you please attach a pre-processed source file (-E option)? @Martin: FAIL start for me during gcc bootstrap somewhere between r277460 and r27748

[Bug ipa/92240] [10 regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:3883

2020-01-14 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240 --- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > @Dmitry: Can you please attach a pre-processed source file (-E option)? done

[Bug ipa/92240] [10 regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:3883

2020-01-14 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92240 --- Comment #9 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- Created attachment 47654 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47654&action=edit pre-processed isl_fold.c gcc_r277495 ./contrib/download_prerequisites ~/src/gcc_r277485/configure --enabl

[Bug c++/92169] crash on referring to a local class member by unqualified name from outside the enclosing function

2020-01-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92169 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/93477] New: [10 Regression] __atribute__((weak)) variables sharing the same name in two named namespaces cause a multiple definition error

2020-01-28 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- r10-6101 PASS r10-6221 FAIL PASS with anonymous namespace

[Bug c++/93477] [10 Regression] __atribute__((weak)) variables sharing the same name in two named namespaces cause a multiple definition error

2020-01-29 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93477 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r10-6310 PASS for me both reduced and unreduced cases. Thanks

[Bug tree-optimization/93516] New: [10 regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest, at tree-sra.c:2342

2020-01-30 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- r10-6309 PASS r10-6342 FAIL $ cat x.ii struct b; struct c { b *operator->(); }; class e { void *f; int d; pub

[Bug c++/93785] New: g++ crash/hang on invalid template

2020-02-17 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- r257061 FAIL -- SVN/gcc version 8.0.1 20180125 r10-6659 FAIL $ cat x.ii template struct b { struct c; b d } using e = b; e f; $ ~/arch-gcc/gcc_current/bin/g++ -fpreprocessed -fchecking

[Bug tree-optimization/93845] New: [10 regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest, at tree-sra.c:2358

2020-02-20 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- probably differs from PR93776 and PR93516 r10-6309 PASS r10-6342 FAIL r10-6723 FAIL [r10-6723] g++ -fpreprocessed

[Bug tree-optimization/93845] [10 regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest, at tree-sra.c:2358

2020-02-20 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93845 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- '-Wall -Wextra -O3' free variant $ cat x.ii struct g; struct h { g *operator->(); }; class i { void *a; int b; public: template f j() { return *static_cast(this); } }; struct k : i {}; struct

[Bug c/93894] New: -Wimplicit-fallthrough false warning with operator %

2020-02-23 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- SVN:r257061 8.0.1 20180125 FAIL r10-6795 FAIL $ cat xx.i int f(int j, int k) { switch (j) { case 0: switch (k % 2) { case 0: return 0

[Bug c/93894] -Wimplicit-fallthrough false warning with operator %

2020-02-23 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93894 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- `unsigned' changes nothing $ cat xxu.i int f1(int j, unsigned k) { switch (j) { case 0: switch (k % 2) { case 0: return 0; case 1: return 1;

[Bug tree-optimization/56830] New: abstract_variables_map

2013-04-03 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830 Bug #: 56830 Summary: abstract_variables_map Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/56830] stl_vector.h:414:7: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2013-04-03 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|abstract_variables_map |stl_vector.h:414:7:

[Bug tree-optimization/56830] stl_vector.h:414:7: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2013-04-03 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-03 11:56:35 UTC --- Fedora 18/x64 $ LANG=C gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc_current/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/lto-wrapper

[Bug tree-optimization/56830] stl_vector.h:414:7: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2013-04-03 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-03 12:18:03 UTC --- 197404 FAIL too. I'll try to reduce testcase g++ -O0 PASS g++ -O1 FAIL I fail select -f... option responsible to FAIL due after gcc -c -Q -O1 --help=optimizers > 1

[Bug tree-optimization/56830] stl_vector.h:414:7: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2013-04-04 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-04 07:40:15 UTC --- 197374 PASS 197375 FAIL

[Bug tree-optimization/56830] stl_vector.h:414:7: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2013-04-04 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-04 18:27:23 UTC --- Created attachment 29806 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29806 ICE with -O1 only $ g++ -Wall -O1 -fpreprocessed -c 56830.ii 56830.ii: In instantiation of ‘v

[Bug tree-optimization/56830] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2013-04-04 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-04 18:45:56 UTC --- strictly speaking this is 'pre-4.8.0' regression gcc version 4.8.0 20130313 (experimental) [trunk revision 196628] (GCC) $ /usr/local/gcc_current_196628/bin/g++ -Wall -O1 -fp

[Bug tree-optimization/56830] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2013-04-04 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-04 18:50:49 UTC --- You are right, sounds like PR34949

[Bug tree-optimization/56830] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2013-04-09 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug c++/34949] Dead code in empty destructors.

2013-04-09 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949 --- Comment #33 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-09 10:07:47 UTC --- *** Bug 56830 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/56961] New: cycle between do_spec_1() / process_brace_body() / handle_braces()

2013-04-15 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56961 Bug #: 56961 Summary: cycle between do_spec_1() / process_brace_body() / handle_braces() Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UN

[Bug c++/56961] stack overflow in gimplifier with volatile field

2013-04-15 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56961 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-15 08:01:24 UTC --- gcc-4.7.2 / Fedora 18 FAIL too gcc version 4.7.2 20121109 (Red Hat 4.7.2-8) (GCC)

[Bug lto/57267] New: [4.9 regression] -flto-partition=none : symbol is already defined

2013-05-13 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: lto Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dimhen at gmail dot com 198366 PASS 198828 FAIL $ g++ -fpreprocessed -flto -c a.ii -o a.o $ g++ -fpreprocessed -flto -c b.ii -o b.o $ g++ -shared a.o b.o -O -flto -flto-partition=none -o

[Bug lto/57267] [4.9 regression] -flto-partition=none : symbol is already defined

2013-05-13 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57267 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- 198815 FAIL

[Bug lto/54632] New: not supported in LTO streams : tree code '�F ��D�� `

2012-09-20 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54632 Bug #: 54632 Summary: not supported in LTO streams : tree code '�F ��D�� ` Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/54632] not supported in LTO streams : tree code '�F ��D�� `

2012-09-20 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54632 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-09-20 07:56:54 UTC --- Created attachment 28226 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28226 lto_output_tree() : print *expr

[Bug lto/54632] [4.8 Regression] not supported in LTO streams : tree code '�F ��D�� `

2012-09-23 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54632 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-09-23 09:22:20 UTC --- 191649 FAIL and, sorry, i cant reduce testcase :( if i run 'g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/dimhen/src/CSPbuild/shared/cplib -I../.. -I/usr/local/include -DUNIX -DLINUX -I/ho

[Bug lto/54632] [4.8 Regression] not supported in LTO streams : tree code '�F ��D�� `

2012-09-23 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54632 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-09-23 09:33:32 UTC --- new in r191649 is eer.location --> DateTime.cpp:934:1 line 934 is outermost '}' in src file

[Bug lto/54632] [4.8 Regression] not supported in LTO streams : tree code '�F ��D�� `

2012-09-23 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54632 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-09-23 10:55:08 UTC --- valgrind show no any appropriate with debug-compiled gcc, only over-optimized access in parser. Hmmm, i am under impression that BUILD_CONFIG=bootstrap-O1 has no effect, and BO

[Bug middle-end/54689] New: sparseset.h:147 Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)

2012-09-24 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54689 Bug #: 54689 Summary: sparseset.h:147 Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 St

[Bug lto/54632] [4.8 Regression] not supported in LTO streams : tree code '�F ��D�� `

2012-09-24 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54632 --- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-09-24 09:46:12 UTC --- for me testcase FAIl with -O2 -flto --param ggc-min-heapsize=0 and OK with -O3 -flto --param ggc-min-expand=0

[Bug middle-end/54689] sparseset.h:147 Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)

2012-09-24 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54689 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-09-24 11:35:56 UTC --- 189310 OK 189563 OK 189602 OK 189648 OK 190510 FAIL 190556 FAIL 190613 FAIL 190868 FAIL 191105 FAIL 191129 FAIL 191244 FAIL 191356 FAIL 191461 FAIL 191511 FAIL

[Bug middle-end/54689] sparseset.h:147 Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)

2012-09-25 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54689 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug lto/54702] New: lto1: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed

2012-09-25 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702 Bug #: 54702 Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/54728] New: [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:254

2012-09-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728 Bug #: 54728 Summary: [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:254 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status

[Bug lto/54728] [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:254

2012-09-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-09-27 12:27:33 UTC --- for reduced test case: $ cp fun1.ii fun2.ii $ g++... $ cat fun1.ii class G; template < typename, typename = G > class A; class B { }; class G:B { }; template

[Bug lto/54728] [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:254

2012-10-01 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-01 10:16:50 UTC --- different (less) testcase this code must be compiled with '-O1'. w/o '-O1' or with '-O0' err not triggered $ cat f1.ii namespace std { template < typename _CharT >

[Bug lto/54794] New: [4.8 regression] tree code '�F Hc���' is not supported in LTO streams

2012-10-03 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794 Bug #: 54794 Summary: [4.8 regression] tree code '�F Hc���' is not supported in LTO streams Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug lto/54794] [4.8 regression] tree code '�F Hc���' is not supported in LTO streams

2012-10-03 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-03 14:04:06 UTC --- i have 23 src-files hence 23 ii-files with about 50Mb code if i remove any file from build then err not triggered (at beginning there were 29 files) i'll run creduce to

[Bug lto/54794] [4.8 regression] tree code '�F Hc���' is not supported in LTO streams

2012-10-07 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-07 10:26:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for any help in reducing this (very likely some random BLOCK again) ;) > If you don't end up with a significantly smaller testcase please

[Bug lto/54794] [4.8 regression] tree code '�F Hc���' is not supported in LTO streams

2012-10-10 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-10 15:12:19 UTC --- creduc'ing it was very slow. r192289 FAIL r192295 PASS probably r192293 fix it

[Bug lto/54794] [4.8 regression] tree code '�F Hc���' is not supported in LTO streams

2012-10-10 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug lto/54898] New: [4.8 regression] ICE in uniquify_nodes, at lto/lto.c:1898

2012-10-11 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54898 Bug #: 54898 Summary: [4.8 regression] ICE in uniquify_nodes, at lto/lto.c:1898 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/54898] [4.8 regression] ICE in uniquify_nodes, at lto/lto.c:1898

2012-10-11 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54898 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-11 10:11:02 UTC --- Created attachment 28422 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28422 2.cpp

[Bug lto/54980] New: [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-18 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 Bug #: 54980 Summary: [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578 Classification: Unclassified

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-18 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-18 23:05:38 UTC --- 192502 OK $ g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc_current_192502/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.0/lto-wrappe

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-18 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-18 23:51:33 UTC --- more reduced $ cat 1.ii extern "C" class A { }; template < int (*t_parser) () > class B { virtual int parse () { A a; t_parser ();

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-18 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-19 00:08:54 UTC --- and more $ cat 1.ii class A { }; template < int (*t_parser) () > class B { virtual int parse () { A a; t_parser (); } }; extern

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-19 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-19 10:26:35 UTC --- 192517 OK 192548 FAIL

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-20 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-20 14:28:28 UTC --- 192529 OK 192538 FAIL

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-24 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-24 09:58:31 UTC --- i re-check 192757 --enable-checking=release FAIL with $ bash -x tf.sh + g++ -flto -fpreprocessed -c 1.ii -o 1.o + g++ -flto -O1 -fpreprocessed -c 2.ii -o 2.o + g++ -O

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-24 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #9 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-24 10:00:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > This does not seem to reproduce for me. The following patch should however fix > it. > Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c > ==

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-24 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-24 12:50:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > This does not seem to reproduce for me. The following patch should however fix > it. > Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c > =

[Bug rtl-optimization/55055] New: [4.8 regression] RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1123

2012-10-24 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55055 Bug #: 55055 Summary: [4.8 regression] RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1123 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/55079] New: [4.8 regeression] false positive -Warray-bounds

2012-10-26 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55079 Bug #: 55079 Summary: [4.8 regeression] false positive -Warray-bounds Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/55085] New: [4.8 regression] false positive -Warray-bounds

2012-10-26 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55085 Bug #: 55085 Summary: [4.8 regression] false positive -Warray-bounds Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/55085] [4.8 regression] false positive -Warray-bounds

2012-10-26 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55085 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-26 15:56:16 UTC --- $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc_current/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-unknown-l

  1   2   3   4   >