t org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27452
--- Comment #3 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-05-06 06:32 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> In fact it is easy to divide by 90° and multiply by pi.
>
You just proved my point, one would want to divide by 180 and multiply by pi
;).
Having sind and co safeguard against such
--- Comment #5 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-05-06 16:24 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
>
> Which is faster? Multiplying and dividing by a literal constant
> directly in your code or a function call to do the trivial work.
>
Really, I don't know enough about co
ponent: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25358
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2005-12-12 05:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=10454)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10454&action=view)
Code that produces above error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25358
--- Comment #2 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2005-12-30 04:50 ---
While I now have a better understanding of this code, and can work around this
particular bug; all reduced testcases I'have been coming up with seems to work,
and the original (attached) code doesn't. So I
gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30902
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2007-02-21 06:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=13081)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13081&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30902
--- Comment #4 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2007-02-21 15:13 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #0)
>
> > By the way, NAG f95 detects the interface/procedure mismatch also for the
> > original program as the inter
)
--
Summary: gfortran failed to compiled a 'valid' code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_akin
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2007-04-16 23:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=13374)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13374&action=view)
testcase (cut and paste from original)
I can provide the whole file if necessary
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #5 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2007-04-17 13:21 ---
Yes adding compiling with -ffixed-line-length-80 solved the issue for me,
thanks to you both. I've noticed the original author of that code used tabs in
a couple of space he should have used spaces, the other comp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37930
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2008-10-27 22:31 ---
A simpler code (without cray pointers) as shown below also produces the errors.
...
subroutine adw_set(G_nk)
implicit none
integer G_nk
real*8 Adw_zbc_8(G_nk)
integer Adw_fn_I(G_nk
--- Comment #9 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2008-10-28 15:47 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > What does ... print?
>
> NaN on both ppc/intel-Darwin9.
>
> > My patch simply fixes the ICE in gfortran.
>
> I think the conversion of NaN to int is buggy since
--- Comment #11 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2008-10-28 17:07 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Subject: Re: gfortran error and ICE at automatic type conversion with
> transfer
> intrinsic
>
> > When I run
> >
> > program test
> >
l
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37974
--- Comment #2 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2008-10-31 03:31 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> call seg_sub(ip, sig, 1)
>
> Is that last argument a literal constant, name 'one'?
> Or is it the letter 'ell'?
>
It is a literal constant '
--- Comment #17 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2008-10-31 04:27 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> ---
>
> From comment 1:
>
> Adw_xabcd_8(1:n) = transfer(-1,1.0) ! Adw_xabcd_8 is REAL
>
> That makes sense: One assigns N
mponent: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39318
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2009-02-27 18:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=17371)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17371&action=view)
Fortran file that produce the ICE
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39318
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39893
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2009-04-25 12:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=17691)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17691&action=view)
invalid program
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39893
t: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39894
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2009-04-25 12:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=17692)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17692&action=view)
Test program
gfortran work fine if I change the line;
'listgeonm(1,:) = geonm(:,1)'
to
'li
--- Comment #3 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2009-04-25 15:32 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> If you compile the code in comment #1 with '-fbounds-check', you get:
>
> At line 32 of file pr39894.f90
> Fortran runtime error: Array bound mismatch, size misma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054
Summary: Compilation error when cray pointers are declared in
both host and internal subroutines
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054
Deji Akingunola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.5.1
--- Comment #3 from Deji Akinguno
--- Comment #3 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-03-15 04:45 ---
I'm re-opening this as my work-around doesn't work. I'll appreciate it if
someone could look at this issue. As mentioned earlier pgf90 and ifort compiles
the (attached) source file fine.
--
deji_aki
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet
--- Additional Comments From deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2004-12-14 19:30
---
Created an attachment (id=7744)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7744&action=view)
FFT code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18998
--- Additional Comments From deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2004-12-14 20:06
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This works for me on ppc-darwin with gcc 4.0.0 (20041214).
I should add that I noticed the problem with gcc 4.0.0 (20041211) on FC3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Additional Comments From deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2004-12-14 20:55
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > I should add that I noticed the problem with gcc 4.0.0 (20041211) on FC3
>
> That still does not give enough information. What target is this, x86?
Yes. I thought I
n gfc_dep_resolver
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30207
--- Comment #7 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-12-17 21:10 ---
Thanks Rogers and Steve for the resolution of this bug. I hope you'll not
forget to commit it to the gcc-4.2 branch.
PS: I've applied the patch cleanly to the 4.2 branch but have not got the
opportunity to
--- Comment #8 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-12-21 03:52 ---
I've applied the fix to 4.2 branch, built and tested it, and it works fine. I
guess the bug can be closed now. Thanks all.
--
deji_aking at yahoo dot ca changed:
What|Re
error: in set_lattice_value, at tree-
ssa-ccp.c:434
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30316
--- Comment #1 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-12-28 07:26 ---
The pre-processed is too big to attach, I've put it on
ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/datalist.cpp
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30316
--- Comment #3 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-12-28 22:07 ---
I'm sorry, it seems I'd posted the .cpp of a different code other than the one
that ICEd(signal.cc). However, the .cpp of signal.cc doesn't ICE for me too. In
any case I've done as you requested and
39 matches
Mail list logo
