[Bug target/46072] AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

2011-03-23 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 Dr. David Kirkby changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.kirkby at onetel dot

[Bug target/46072] AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

2011-03-23 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 --- Comment #14 from Dr. David Kirkby 2011-03-23 17:11:42 UTC --- Has anyone with an AIX support contract ever raised this issue with IBM? If so, is there a publicly viewable location for this? If not, can someone do it. My own RS/6000

[Bug target/46072] AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

2011-03-24 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 --- Comment #16 from Dr. David Kirkby 2011-03-24 13:22:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > Let me try and recap. > > The initial report was that 5.3 TL10 did *not* have the error. I discovered > that 5.3 TL10 SP03 does. See [1]. >

[Bug target/46072] AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

2011-04-07 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 --- Comment #20 from Dr. David Kirkby 2011-04-07 17:15:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) > > IBM is aware of the issue (via me and others). The last tidbit I have is > > that > > it appears as if it is another assembler bug but that is not c

[Bug target/46072] AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

2011-04-08 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 --- Comment #23 from Dr. David Kirkby 2011-04-08 21:31:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > I found an workaround. When I realized that /usr/bin/as was the culprit (from > looking at IZ98134), I tried using as from other AIX box at TL4, and it

[Bug target/46072] AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

2011-04-11 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 --- Comment #24 from Dr. David Kirkby 2011-04-12 02:38:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > I found an workaround. When I realized that /usr/bin/as was the culprit > > (from > > looking at IZ98134), I tried using

[Bug target/46072] AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

2011-05-17 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 --- Comment #27 from Dr. David Kirkby 2011-05-17 15:25:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > The fixed assembler is available as an efix for customers who ask. Can you give me more precise details about how to get this. Who do I ask - I don't

[Bug c/46155] New: Bug with generation of float.h header file on AIX

2010-10-23 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155 Summary: Bug with generation of float.h header file on AIX Product: gcc Version: 4.2.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unas

[Bug c/46155] Bug with generation of float.h header file on AIX

2010-10-23 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155 --- Comment #1 from Dr. David Kirkby 2010-10-24 03:51:23 UTC --- Created attachment 22138 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22138 This is the IBM header file (/usr/include/float.h) from an AIX 5.3 system Clearly this shows that

[Bug c/46155] Bug with generation of float.h header file on AIX

2010-10-23 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155 --- Comment #2 from Dr. David Kirkby 2010-10-24 03:54:48 UTC --- Created attachment 22139 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22139 Header file created by gcc. Stored at /opt/pware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/4.2.4/include/floa

[Bug c/46155] Bug with generation of float.h header file on AIX

2010-10-23 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155 --- Comment #3 from Dr. David Kirkby 2010-10-24 04:17:44 UTC --- It looks to me that the GCC header file lacks several definitions that are in the IBM header file (DEC128_EPSILON is another example). The size of the IBM header is around twice tha

[Bug c/46155] Bug with generation of float.h header file on AIX

2010-10-23 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155 --- Comment #4 from Dr. David Kirkby 2010-10-24 04:24:58 UTC --- I forgot to say, this is with the latest version of the GNU Scientific library (gsl-1.14). The hardware used is * IBM RS/6000 7025 F50 * 4 x 332 MHz 32-bit PowerPC CPUs * 3 G

[Bug c/46155] Bug with generation of float.h header file on AIX

2010-10-24 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155 --- Comment #7 from Dr. David Kirkby 2010-10-24 15:05:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, david.kirkby at onetel dot net wrote: > > > On an IBM server running AIX 5.3, 'fprnd_t' is clearly defined

[Bug c/46155] Bug with generation of float.h header file on AIX

2010-10-24 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155 --- Comment #9 from Dr. David Kirkby 2010-10-24 16:10:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, david.kirkby at onetel dot net wrote: > > > I don't have a copy of the C standard. Is there one publicly availa

[Bug c/46155] Bug with generation of float.h header file on AIX

2010-10-26 Thread david.kirkby at onetel dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155 --- Comment #12 from Dr. David Kirkby 2010-10-26 17:59:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #7) > > In your opinion, are IBM wrong to define fprnd_t in /usr/include/float.h? > > IBM's definition of fprnd_t in is within #i