https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #18 from Dominik Schmidt ---
Created attachment 41803
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41803&action=edit
Patch working for us
Indeed, it seems to be a duplicate of the other bug.
We backported the GCC-7 patch and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
Dominik Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728
Dominik Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@dominik-schmidt.de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #12 from Dominik Schmidt ---
I'm using glibc-2.25.
Anything else I can provide?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #14 from Dominik Schmidt ---
Yes, will do on Sunday or next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #17 from Dominik Schmidt ---
I'm having issues to build our whole stack with gcc-6-branch. Working on it.
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: d...@dominik-schmidt.de
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41065
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41065&action=edit
part 1 of minimal example
Hey,
we are facing a crash when compiling the attached cpp fil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Schmidt ---
Created attachment 41066
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41066&action=edit
part 2 of minimal example: bar.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Schmidt ---
Created attachment 41067
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41067&action=edit
g++ --version --verbose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #4 from Dominik Schmidt ---
AddressSanitizer output:
=
==597==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7e842bd0 at
pc 0x00013d20 bp 0x7e8428dc sp 0x7e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Schmidt ---
-fsanitize=undefined does not make any difference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236
--- Comment #8 from Dominik Schmidt ---
-fsanitize=address -g:
==539==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ebcac10 at
pc 0x00013d20 bp 0x7ebca90c sp 0x7ebca904
READ of size 16 at 0x7ebcac10 thread T0
#0 0x13d1f in void
12 matches
Mail list logo
