[Bug bootstrap/27794] stack explosion

2008-05-02 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-02 09:14 --- I think it is a duplicate of PR 35169. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27794

[Bug target/36090] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ppc64 cacoshl miscompilation

2008-05-08 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #30 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-09 05:36 --- fixed? -- cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/36079] [4.3/4.4 Regression] cld instruction is not emitted anymore.

2008-05-20 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-20 07:08 --- >>> >>>ISVs usually build with compilers from the stone-age to be able to run their >>>applications on all still supported OS versions. I agree! -- whi

[Bug target/36079] [4.3/4.4 Regression] cld instruction is not emitted anymore.

2008-05-20 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-20 08:48 --- How to reopen bug 36079? Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36079

[Bug target/36079] [4.3/4.4 Regression] cld instruction is not emitted anymore.

2008-05-20 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-20 15:17 --- if configure gcc 4.3.1 with --enable-cld on Redhat AS 3.0 U2. The programs build with gcc 4.3.1 run well on all Redhat AS 3.0/4.0/5.0, SUSE 9/10 or other Linux OS versions, is it right? If no --enable-cld with gcc

[Bug target/36079] [4.3/4.4 Regression] cld instruction is not emitted anymore.

2008-05-20 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-20 15:23 --- GCC 4.2.4 works well on Rehat AS 3.0 U2. How can I use gcc 4.3.1 instead of gcc 4.2.X? I want to build my programs on Rehat AS 3.0 U2 with newer gcc, 4.2.4 or 4.3.1. At the same time, I want the compiled programs run

[Bug target/36079] [4.3/4.4 Regression] cld instruction is not emitted anymore.

2008-05-21 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-22 02:41 --- I have read the discussions on gcc-patches. The patchs: --enable-cld used default on x86 and x86_64. If build gcc 4.3.1 using --enable-cld: when use -m32, gcc use -mcld default. when use -m64, gcc not

[Bug c++/36330] New: i386-pc-solaris2.10 configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2008-05-25 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36330

[Bug bootstrap/36330] i386-pc-solaris2.10 configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2008-05-25 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-26 00:43 --- gmp 4.2.2, mpfr 2.3.1 Both gmp and mpfr build with "--disable-shared ABI=32" gcc 4.3.1 configure: ../src/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.3.1 --with-gmp=/opt/gcc-4.3.1/gmp --with-mpfr=/opt/gcc-4.3.1/mpfr --wi

[Bug bootstrap/36330] i386-pc-solaris2.10 configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2008-05-25 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-26 00:54 --- I want both build my programs -m32 -m64 My OS is solaris 10 x86_64. I can run well with gcc 4.2.3. If I build gcc 4.3.1 with --disable-multilib, I can only compile with apps with -m32? -- cnstar9988 at gmail dot

[Bug bootstrap/36330] i386-pc-solaris2.10 configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2008-05-25 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-26 02:14 --- gcc 4.3.1 can build with --disable-multilib on i386-pc-solaris2.10. It can only compiles 32bit apps. gcc 4.3.1 can build on sparc-sun-solaris2.10. It can compiles 32bit and 64bit apps

[Bug bootstrap/36330] i386-pc-solaris2.10 configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2008-05-28 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-29 01:48 --- PR33100 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100 gcc-4.3.1-RC-20080523.tar.bz2 binutils 2.18 Solaris 10 x86_64 U4 gcc is configured to use GNU as but Sun ld. works well on 4.2.3. but failed on 4.3.1. Now I

[Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0

2008-05-28 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-29 02:30 --- i386-pc-solaris2.10 has the same problem. -- cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/36330] i386-pc-solaris2.10 configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2008-05-28 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-29 04:50 --- Created an attachment (id=15697) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15697&action=view) config.log config.log -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36330

[Bug bootstrap/36330] i386-pc-solaris2.10 configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2008-05-28 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-29 04:51 --- configure:2540: checking for C compiler default output file name configure:2543: /export/home/test/gcc-4.3.1-build/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/export/home/test/gcc-4.3.1-build/build/./gcc/ -B/opt/gcc-4.3.1/i386-pc-solaris2.10

[Bug bootstrap/36330] i386-pc-solaris2.10 configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2008-05-28 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-29 04:56 --- google "crtend.o: section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset" You will find a lot of comments about the question. http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=54665&tstart=0 -- http://gcc.gn

[Bug bootstrap/36330] i386-pc-solaris2.10 configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2008-06-06 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-06-07 04:04 --- Ping... I have attached config.log for a few days. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36330

[Bug target/36079] [4.3/4.4 Regression] cld instruction is not emitted anymore.

2008-06-10 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-06-10 10:07 --- I build gcc 4.3.1 with --with-cld ./src/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.3.1 --with-gmp=/opt/gcc-4.3.1/gmp --with-mpfr=/opt/gcc-4.3.1/mpfr --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-nls --enable-bootstrap --disable-shared

[Bug tree-optimization/36373] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Wrong code with struct return

2008-06-25 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-06-26 06:51 --- ping... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36373

[Bug libfortran/36546] Namelist error with tab following a comma and newline

2008-07-16 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-07-16 14:24 --- Target Milestone is 4.3.3? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36546

[Bug libfortran/36657] Namelist reading bug with string constant immediately followed by comment

2008-07-16 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-07-16 14:24 --- Target Milestone is 4.3.3? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36657

[Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0

2008-07-17 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #19 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-07-18 03:37 --- ping... gcc 4.2.3 works well, gcc 4.2.4/4.3.0/4.3.1 works failed. i386-pc-solaris2.10 gas 2.18 + sun ld -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100

[Bug middle-end/36691] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] wrong value left in induction variable

2008-08-04 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-04 12:42 --- ping... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36691

[Bug middle-end/36691] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] wrong value left in induction variable

2008-08-04 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-04 13:12 --- confirmed gcc 4.2.4, -O3. gcc test.c -O3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36691

<    1   2