https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96768
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
This is related to comments 10,11,14,15 and 16 in the original PR94538.
In comment 14, Wilco suggested: "The best option is to do the same as
Cortex-M3: just switch off branch tables altogether and fall ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96768
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
Send patch proposal:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/552798.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96768
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-27
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96579
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96768
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
That's what I replied in the original PR94538, but Wilco said the best option
was to turn off switch tables:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538#c14
See also another comment from him:
https:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #17 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 49162
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49162&action=edit
Full Neon intrinsics list as of 2020-09-01.
Full Neon intrinsics list as of 2020-09-01.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #18 from Christophe Lyon ---
The list at
https://developer.arm.com/architectures/instruction-sets/simd-isas/neon/intrinsics
has a new format (the list is split in 146 pages, I couldn't find how to get
the list on a single page). So I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #19 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 49165
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49165&action=edit
Full list of intrinsics documented for v7/a32/a64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #20 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 49166
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49166&action=edit
Full list of intrinsics documented for a32/a64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #21 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 49167
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49167&action=edit
Full list of intrinsics documented for a64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #22 from Christophe Lyon ---
Applying the recipe from comment #6, the current list of duplicates is:
New ones:
2 vcmla_laneq_f16
2 vcmla_rot180_laneq_f16
2 vcmla_rot270_laneq_f16
2 vcmla_rot90_laneq_f16
Known,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #24 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 49169
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49169&action=edit
a32/a64 intrinsics not supported by the aarch64 target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #23 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 49168
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49168&action=edit
v7 intrinsics not supported by the aarch64 target
Update 2020-09-01
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #25 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 49170
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49170&action=edit
a64 intrinsics not supported by the aarch64 target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #26 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 49171
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49171&action=edit
v7 intrinsics not supported by the aarch32/arm target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #27 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 49172
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49172&action=edit
a32/a64 intrinsics not supported by the aarch32/arm target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96769
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Applying the same process as in PR71233, I have noticed a few MVE intrinsics
are not implemented:
__arm_vcvtnq_u32_f32
__arm_vqdmlashq_m_n_s16
__arm_vqdmlashq_m_n_s32
__arm_vqdmlashq_m_n_s8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96914
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96769
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94595
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
For thumb2-cond-cmp-4.c (if ( (i >= '+') ? (j <= '-') : 1) ) we generate:
* cortex-m0:
f:
cmp r0, #42
ble .L3
movsr3, #45
movsr2, #0
lsrsr0, r1,
: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
since r11-3025
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96767
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96770
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-08
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #11 from Christophe Lyon ---
Ha sorry I missed the beginning (interleaved in the log with other commands):
during RTL pass: sched_fusion
vfprintf-internal.c: In function '__vfprintf_internal':
vfprintf-internal.c:1702:1: internal comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #13 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 49206
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49206&action=edit
glibc testcase for aarch64 ICE
The vfprintf-internal.i preprocessed source from glibc-2.29 creates an ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #14 from Christophe Lyon ---
I that's easier for you, there are similar ICEs while running the GCC testsuite
for aarch64-elf (newlib build works):
Executed from: gcc.c-torture/compile/compile.exp
gcc.c-torture/compile/950613-1.
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Commit g47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168 (PR96043) has caused many
regressions on aarch64, the first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95421
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to SRINATH PARVATHANENI from comment #3)
> I see following intrinsics for AArch64 already implemented.
> vst3q_lane_p8
> vst3q_lane_s8
> vst3q_lane_u8
>
Yes, they are missing in the arm p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97041
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #22 from Christophe Lyon ---
Yes, that fixes the build for aarch64, thanks!
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Since r11-3148 (g:8d3767c30240c901a493d82d9d20f306b2f0152d), I've noticed that:
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cost_mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97056
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
No, it was failing at that time.
It started passing between r11-3093 and r11-3103, and fails again since
r11-3148.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97057
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
When configuring gcc with --disable-libstdcxx-pch, two libstdc++ fail on arm
(linux and newlib targets) and aarch64 (with
: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Between r11-3230 and r11-3249 (g:052204fac580b21c967e57e6285d99a9828b8fac and
g:ecde1b0a467127714872785b9935fe7c580778f0), I've noticed:
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/mall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97090
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
I see random results from one run to another, so it's likely that something is
not initialized correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97090
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |arm aarch64
--- Comment #2 from Christ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97088
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1)
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, clyon at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > This happens because the testcase does
> > #define x (
> > and
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This testcase causes a false positive 'may be used uninitialized' warning when
compiled with -O2 -Wall. It is derived from libiberty/p
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Since r11-3258 g:c7f4be78cb61006492d16375aba5392f580cd633
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Since r11-3303 (g:6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0) several testcases
now fail on arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97146
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
On arm, there is also:
FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/composite-type.c (test for excess errors)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92128
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
|u |u arm aarch64
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
Seen on arm and aarch64 too.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As discussed in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01619.html
I have noticed a regression after r277179.
However, it seems tricky to reproduce, and I had to manually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 47102
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47102&action=edit
Executable from r277178
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 47103
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47103&action=edit
Executable from r277179
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 47105
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47105&action=edit
Execution trace for r277179
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 47104
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47104&action=edit
Execution trace for r277178
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
In particular, the execution continues after the last block dumped by qemu:
0x00018e40: e5974008 ldr r4, [r7, #8]
0x00018e44: e0898008 add r8, sb, r8
0x00018e48: e3888001 orr r8, r8, #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92207
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon ---
When single-stepping in the r277178 executable, the final
=> 0x18bc0 <_malloc_r+1092>:str r3, [r2, #4]
succeeds and
(gdb) p /x $r2
$2 = 0x804aa40
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61761
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61761
--- Comment #13 from Christophe Lyon ---
It's still failing on trunk:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2019-11/msg00131.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92208
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92208
--- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #8)
> (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #7)
> > On gcc-9, the patch introduced regressions, seen on arm and aarch64:
>
> On trunk, the following was needed (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92333
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The test pr92324-2.c introduced at r277958 fails on arm and aarch64:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr92324-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr92324-2.c execution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92473
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 47218
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47218&action=edit
Execution trace for arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92473
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 47217
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47217&action=edit
Execution trace for aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91613
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91612
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92047
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91975
Bug 91975 depends on bug 92047, which changed state.
Bug 92047 Summary: [10 regression] aarch64 regressions after r276645
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92047
What|Removed |Added
--
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
After commit r278938, I've noticed regressions on aarch64:
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/fmla_intrinsic_1.c scan-assembler-times
fmla\\tv[0-9]+.2s, v[0-9]+.2s, v[0-9]+.2s\\
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88827
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Fri Dec 6 10:54:46 2019
New Revision: 279039
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279039&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[testsuite][aarch64] type_redef_11.c: Update expected diagnostics.
Afte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36941
--- Comment #11 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Fri Dec 6 10:54:46 2019
New Revision: 279039
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279039&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[testsuite][aarch64] type_redef_11.c: Update expected diagnostics.
Aft
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The test fails on aarch64:
g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C -std=c++14 (internal compiler error)
g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
g++.dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263
--- Comment #15 from Christophe Lyon ---
> Seen on arm too, both master and gcc-9
And aarch64 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40752
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93375
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93473
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92706
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
--- Comment #13 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #12)
> (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #9)
> > > Fixed by Vlad's patch on the trunk.
> >
> > This pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93375
--- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #7)
> Does the patch in comment #6 fix the remaining test failures for everyone?
It's OK for me on arm, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
It worked for me with gcc-8-branch at
g:9eba9635f653291804ecb832eebe1ed96e3346ba
Using:
../gcc/configure --with-arch=armv7-a --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-float=hard
--with-mode=thumb --with-build-config=boo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
I added --enable-default-pie to my configure options, and it's still
successful.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57708
--- Comment #6 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Mon Sep 2 14:59:09 2013
New Revision: 202176
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202176&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-08-26 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
Backport fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58065
--- Comment #9 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Thu Sep 5 12:27:56 2013
New Revision: 202276
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202276&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-05 Christophe Lyon
Backport from trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57431
--- Comment #3 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Thu Sep 5 12:31:03 2013
New Revision: 202277
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202277&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-05 Christophe Lyon
Backport from trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56315
--- Comment #2 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Thu Sep 5 12:38:03 2013
New Revision: 202280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202280&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2013-09-05 Christophe Lyon
Backport fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58578
--- Comment #4 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Tue Oct 1 13:19:31 2013
New Revision: 203059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-10-01 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
gcc/
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58578
--- Comment #6 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Wed Oct 2 14:07:45 2013
New Revision: 203116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203116&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add forgotten test case for r203059.
2013-10-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58578
--- Comment #7 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Wed Oct 2 22:12:37 2013
New Revision: 203137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203137&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-10-01 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
Backport fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58423
--- Comment #4 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Fri Nov 8 14:22:10 2013
New Revision: 204570
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204570&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2013-11-05 Zhenqiang Chen
Backport from trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59142
--- Comment #8 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Thu Dec 19 16:32:04 2013
New Revision: 206123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206123&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-19 Charles Baylis
PR target/59142
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59142
--- Comment #9 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Thu Dec 19 16:51:35 2013
New Revision: 206124
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206124&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-19 Charles Baylis
PR target/59142
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59142
--- Comment #10 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Thu Dec 19 16:54:16 2013
New Revision: 206125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206125&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-19 Charles Baylis
PR target/59142
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51509
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
|u |u arm aarch64
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
I see the same error on arm and aarch64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88456
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
Looks like there was a misunderstanding, I was probably not clear.
r263082 actually removed the regression I reported, because that commit reverts
the offending one. So current trunk is OK.
I'm looking ag
101 - 200 of 1216 matches
Mail list logo
