[Bug rtl-optimization/91332] ICE: Segfault in gfortran when compiling massive subroutine with -O3

2020-03-01 Thread clogged.drainpipe at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91332 --- Comment #3 from Madarpok . --- Any movement regarding this?

[Bug fortran/91332] New: ICE: Segfault in gfortran when compiling massive function with -O3

2019-08-02 Thread clogged.drainpipe at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clogged.drainpipe at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 46664 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46664&action=edit gzipped source to re

[Bug rtl-optimization/91332] ICE: Segfault in gfortran when compiling massive subroutine with -O3

2019-08-07 Thread clogged.drainpipe at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91332 --- Comment #2 from Madarpok . --- I can confirm that raising the stack limit with ulimit -s unlimited does not prevent this crash. Something inside gfortran is breaking/overflowing.

[Bug web/117309] New: [Docs] C++23 is not mentioned on the "supported standards" doc page

2024-10-26 Thread clogged.drainpipe at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: web Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clogged.drainpipe at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I think https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Standards.html should mention the status of C++23 support in GCC.

[Bug c++/117309] [Docs] C++23 is not mentioned on the "supported standards" doc page

2024-10-26 Thread clogged.drainpipe at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117309 --- Comment #2 from Madarpok . --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Well c++23 was only published within the last month. Hmm, fair enough. -std=c++2b has been supported for quite a while, but I see your point.

[Bug web/118159] New: [Docs][Link rot] Fortran coco is now an online casino

2024-12-20 Thread clogged.drainpipe at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
Component: web Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clogged.drainpipe at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- On this docs page: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Preprocessing-Options.html users are pointed to get the coco program for Conditional Compilation

[Bug fortran/118161] New: Better preprocessing in gfortran

2024-12-20 Thread clogged.drainpipe at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clogged.drainpipe at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The state of preprocessing is not great in Fortran. Coco is dead and gone, and nothing got standardized instead. Gfortran supports running the C preprocessor in "tradit