http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54102
Bug #: 54102
Summary: generated html vs. utf8
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54102
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53579
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-08-07
23:04:05 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Tue Aug 7 23:03:55 2012
New Revision: 190216
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190216
Log:
2012-08-07 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/54
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52068
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-02
19:59:04 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Feb 2 19:58:59 2012
New Revision: 183846
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183846
Log:
2012-02-02 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/52
||2012-02-02
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #29 from Benjamin Kos
||2012-02-03
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Ever Confirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51811
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-03
19:49:17 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Fri Feb 3 19:49:11 2012
New Revision: 183875
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183875
Log:
2012-02-03 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/51
||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #8 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-03
20:19:48 UTC ---
Mine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
--- Comment #9 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-03
20:28:29 UTC ---
This is no longer present on 4.7.x branch. I'm going to add this test case in
any case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
--- Comment #10 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-03
21:10:06 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Fri Feb 3 21:10:00 2012
New Revision: 183878
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183878
Log:
2012-02-03 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46447
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-03
21:23:44 UTC ---
Just an update on this...
with gcc-4.7 2012-02-03
-g -O2
%./a-02.out
spin_mutex_tt took 84.0168 cycles (averaged over 1 trials)
af_set_tt took 36.7017 cycles (averaged ove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798
--- Comment #26 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-09
08:45:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 26620
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26620
complete transition to __atomic, modulo config
... and for config, plan would be to just remove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26620|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798
--- Comment #29 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-09
23:21:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 26635
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26635
complete transition to __atomic, v3
All bits in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798
--- Comment #30 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-10
18:20:50 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Fri Feb 10 18:20:43 2012
New Revision: 184110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184110
Log:
2012-02-10 Benjamin Kosnik
Jonatha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51811
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51368
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-15
19:56:12 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Wed Feb 15 19:56:07 2012
New Revision: 184282
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184282
Log:
2012-02-15 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51368
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-15
20:11:24 UTC ---
Mine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
--- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-15
20:20:24 UTC ---
what's the python version you are using that is not working?
I am using 2.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51368
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-15
20:24:51 UTC ---
This probably needs changing
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #30 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-16
19:49:12 UTC ---
Marking as fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2012-02-16
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50349
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47058
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-17
20:26:37 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Fri Feb 17 20:26:32 2012
New Revision: 184349
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184349
Log:
2012-02-17 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/47
||2012-02-17
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Ever Confirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47058
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798
--- Comment #32 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-17
20:52:04 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Fri Feb 17 20:51:58 2012
New Revision: 184350
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184350
Log:
2012-02-17 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51368
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2012-02-21
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Kosnik
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50349
--- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-21
23:46:55 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Tue Feb 21 23:46:49 2012
New Revision: 184453
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184453
Log:
2012-02-17 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50349
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50349
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52191
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-28
20:21:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 26774
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26774
patch to check new symbols are in new version names
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52191
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Ko
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52191
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-28
20:25:53 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Tue Feb 28 20:25:48 2012
New Revision: 184639
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184639
Log:
2012-02-21 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52191
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
--- Comment #19 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-03-01
00:21:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 26794
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26794
gets conditionally declared/used
Here's a way to deal with gets that is pretty simple. If it's a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26794|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
--- Comment #24 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-03-02
07:14:02 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Fri Mar 2 07:13:55 2012
New Revision: 184774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184774
Log:
2012-03-01 Benjamin Kosnik
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52456
--- Comment #7 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-03-09
18:46:52 UTC ---
Hey all. Undesignated are optionally-added symbols (like tls) that are
configure or platform dependant and so are not set into the baselines. This is
new.
They are not FAIL. It's t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689
--- Comment #9 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-03-29
06:14:41 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Mar 29 06:14:32 2012
New Revision: 185950
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185950
Log:
2012-03-28 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689
--- Comment #14 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-04-04
17:06:09 UTC ---
Patch in comment #12 is ok to check in. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689
--- Comment #15 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-04-04
17:23:52 UTC ---
Patch in comment #13 is ok to check in, sadly.
||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
Host||x86_64-linux-gnu
Build||x86_64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-04-05
00:42:48 UTC ---
This patch is ok.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52796
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689
--- Comment #17 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-04-17
00:19:18 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Tue Apr 17 00:19:12 2012
New Revision: 186517
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186517
Log:
2012-04-16 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
PR bo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52840
--- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-04-17
00:19:16 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Tue Apr 17 00:19:12 2012
New Revision: 186517
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186517
Log:
2012-04-16 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
PR boo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689
--- Comment #18 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-04-17
02:21:29 UTC ---
Patch plus revisions in gcc-4_7-branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52866
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53006
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689
--- Comment #19 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-04-25
01:18:02 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Wed Apr 25 01:17:57 2012
New Revision: 186794
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186794
Log:
2012-04-24 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689
--- Comment #20 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-04-25
02:00:06 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52447
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689
--- Comment #21 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-04-25
22:48:03 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Wed Apr 25 22:47:52 2012
New Revision: 186845
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186845
Log:
2012-04-25 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51804
Bug #: 51804
Summary: Wabi false positives
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51804
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-09
21:27:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 26284
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26284
log file of 'make check-libstdc++-v3' with -Wabi
72 new fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51804
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-09
21:44:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 26286
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26286
enables -Wabi for 'make check-libstdc++-v3'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51804
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-09
21:45:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 26287
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26287
pre-processed test file, run with -Wabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51673
--- Comment #9 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-09
23:39:30 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Mon Jan 9 23:39:22 2012
New Revision: 183043
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183043
Log:
2012-01-09 Kai Tietz
PR libstc++/51673 par
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51673
--- Comment #10 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-09
23:42:01 UTC ---
Thanks guys. This looks good, and is in trunk.
Pawel, thanks for noticing this. Please note that namespace versioning was
updated for 4.7.x to bring this experimental feature up
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51804
--- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-10
00:06:05 UTC ---
Ah! Ok. I didn't realize there was an -fabi-version=6. Now I get it. Stupid me,
for thinking v3 was the latest greatest, doh.
From:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.2/gcc/C_00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51804
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51849
Bug #: 51849
Summary: -Wc99-compat would be considered useful
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-19
08:52:04 UTC ---
As per #4, here's the convenience library approach.
With this, libstdc++.so is composed of three convenience libraries:
1. libsupc++convenience.la
2. libstdc++98convenience.la
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-19
08:52:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 26373
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26373
libstdc++ binary composed from three convenience libraries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26373|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26374|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #10 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-19
16:40:45 UTC ---
I still don't get this part of it: "Then you build the shared library from it,
and link gcc to the convenience library."
When there is not one convenience library, but three. Seem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26383|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #14 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-20
22:25:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 26398
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26398
try 5, src/c++11/.libs, src/c++98/.libs, libstdc++convenience.la
Changes:
1) nest source SUBDIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #16 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-23
22:21:53 UTC ---
Well I tried to just use the generated Makefile rules to hack together a
solution for --disable-static using the convenience libraries
My plan was to generate a libstdc++convenien
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #17 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-23
23:12:07 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Mon Jan 23 23:12:01 2012
New Revision: 183457
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183457
Log:
2012-01-20 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #18 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-24
05:07:58 UTC ---
Mine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #24 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-03-08
00:04:10 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Tue Mar 8 00:04:05 2011
New Revision: 170763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170763
Log:
2011-03-07 Benjamin Kosnik
Matthia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48130
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48130
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48130
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-03-15
05:34:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 23660
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23660
patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48130
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-03-15
06:19:12 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Tue Mar 15 06:19:08 2011
New Revision: 170979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170979
Log:
2011-03-14 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46922
--- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-03-15
18:43:21 UTC ---
Hey P, why was bad_function_call added in CXXABI instead of GLIBCXX? That
doesn't make sense to me.
-benjamin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48130
--- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-03-15
19:01:57 UTC ---
HP if you can confirm this is now working, can you close this? thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #26 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-03-22
08:59:02 UTC ---
Matthias, this should allow you to remove the current debian docs patch. Does
it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36104
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #29 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-04-04
18:47:44 UTC ---
f14 x86_64, no ppl
%rpm -qa | grep mpfr
mpfr-devel-2.4.2-1.fc13.x86_64
mpfr-2.4.2-1.fc13.x86_64
/mnt/share/bld/gcc-trunk
%rpm -qa | grep
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #38 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-04-04
21:37:21 UTC ---
YES, please revert whatever is causing this ASAP. Bootstrap has been broken for
much too long, on all the common devel arches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #41 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-04-05
00:36:50 UTC ---
I can confirm that r171959 with --enable-checking bootstraps on
f14/x86_64/linux, which was not previously the case. Thanks Bernd! I can also
assert that it still fails with --disa
||2011.04.05 00:49:47
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-04-05
00:49:47 UTC ---
Confirmed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |---
--- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48669
Summary: sel_sched_region_2's "need_stall" vs.
-Werror=uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-05-21
02:09:02 UTC ---
Mine. Fixed momentarily.
||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #33 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-05-21
02:09:20 UTC ---
Mine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45148
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923
Summary: constexpr diagnostic w/ non-literal
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
101 - 200 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
