[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

2017-04-18 Thread bijan at chokoufe dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #34 from Bijan Chokoufe --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #32) > Running your testsuite on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu > with a current trunk and "make -k check" gets me > > PASS: mlm_matching_isr.run > > but also a few mo

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

2017-04-18 Thread bijan at chokoufe dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #36 from Bijan Chokoufe --- Created attachment 41219 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41219&action=edit Diff of generalized assembly with and without volatile

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

2017-04-18 Thread bijan at chokoufe dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #37 from Bijan Chokoufe --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #35) > [tkoenig@gcc1-power7 shower]$ pwd > /home/tkoenig/whizard-2.4.1/src/shower > [tkoenig@gcc1-power7 shower]$ grep -i volatile *.f90 > [tkoenig@gcc1-power7 showe

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

2017-04-18 Thread bijan at chokoufe dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #39 from Bijan Chokoufe --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #38) > (In reply to Bijan Chokoufe from comment #37) > > Concerning your PowerPC compilation: Have you set FCLAGS yourself > > No, I didn't.; I just ran "./configure

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

2017-04-18 Thread bijan at chokoufe dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #43 from Bijan Chokoufe --- I actually made the same mistake when generating the diffs. I attach the correct diff when --with-precision=extended is given to configure. Similar contents though, as far as I can judge. Strangely, the cod

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

2017-04-18 Thread bijan at chokoufe dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #44 from Bijan Chokoufe --- Created attachment 41222 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41222&action=edit Diff of generalized assembly using extended precision with and without volatile

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

2017-02-09 Thread bijan at chokoufe dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 Bijan Chokoufe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bijan at chokoufe dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

2017-02-09 Thread bijan at chokoufe dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #19 from Bijan Chokoufe --- So in the build with '-O2 -g' (default), valgrind tells us ==8214== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==8214==at 0x5300201: __shower_core_MOD_shower_generate_next_isr_branching

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

2017-04-14 Thread bijan at chokoufe dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #30 from Bijan Chokoufe --- > Could you maybe do the following: > > - Use your normal sources > > - Change the compilation options to add -fdump-tree-all to the relevant > file > > - Copy all the generated xxx.f90.whatever files