https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99566
Bug ID: 99566
Summary: designated initialization rejects explicit constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99629
Bug ID: 99629
Summary: Misleading diagnostic when looking up rewritten
candidate and failing
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79070
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100037
Bug ID: 100037
Summary: lookup doesn't find class template parameter in
default member initializer of forward declared nested
class template
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100054
Bug ID: 100054
Summary: internal compiler error: in get_nsdmi
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100054
--- Comment #2 from Barry Revzin ---
In case it helps, here's a different example which on trunk ICEs in get_nsdmi,
but on gcc 10.2 and 10.3 ICEs on "unexpected expression '(F)()' of kind implicit_conv_expr" (and is accepted by 10.1)
struct F {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100070
Bug ID: 100070
Summary: Standard library container iterator-pair constructors
should check C++20 iterator concepts
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100084
Bug ID: 100084
Summary: using enum lookup isn't type-only
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100084
--- Comment #1 from Barry Revzin ---
Also gcc accepts:
namespace A { enum A {}; };
using namespace A;
using enum A::A;
Which, apparently, this one should actually be ambiguous.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97518
Bug ID: 97518
Summary: Improving static_assert diagnostics
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97562
Bug ID: 97562
Summary: NRVO is very fragile (adding an extra scope breaks the
optimization)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97562
--- Comment #2 from Barry Revzin ---
Yep, looks like the same issue to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51242
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97934
Bug ID: 97934
Summary: Defaulting <=> breaks other equality operators
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98071
Bug ID: 98071
Summary: no_unique_address and reusing tail padding
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98071
--- Comment #1 from Barry Revzin ---
On further discussion, since the ABI disallows reusing the tail padding of
PODs, sizeof(B) cannot be 8. This is more likely a clang bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98142
Bug ID: 98142
Summary: fstrict-enums optimization applied only for unscoped
enums with unfixed underlying type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98142
--- Comment #2 from Barry Revzin ---
That is a great point.
I guess in general this is kind of a scary optimization, since it doesn't seem
like it's really a global thing? Perhaps this calls for an attribute?
[[gnu::i_promise_on_penalty_of_ub_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97195
Bug ID: 97195
Summary: construct_at on a union member is not a constant
expression
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97285
Bug ID: 97285
Summary: Interaction between no_unique_address and
has_unique_object_representations
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98706
Bug ID: 98706
Summary: spurious unused-set-but-not-used when a parameter pack
is empty
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85428
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99091
Bug ID: 99091
Summary: constexpr variable evaluated at runtime
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100322
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100322
--- Comment #5 from Barry Revzin ---
Sorry meant to actually copy the reduction:
#include
bool compare_count(int a, int b)
{
return a > b;
}
bool compare(int a, int b)
{
return (a <=> b) > 0;
}
which generates:
compare_count(int,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100639
Bug ID: 100639
Summary: reverse_view::reference erroneously uses
iterator_traits::reference instead of
iter_reference_t
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100835
Bug ID: 100835
Summary: defaulted equality gives wrong answer, if constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101006
Bug ID: 101006
Summary: Request diagnostic for likely concept syntax errors
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108744
Bug ID: 108744
Summary: error message when trying to use structured bindings
in static member declaration could be cleaner
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108744
--- Comment #3 from Barry Revzin ---
Yeah, they're banned in non-static data members also. But there, we just can't
have any "auto" non-static data members, whereas you can have "auto" static
data members (just not structured bindings).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108823
Bug ID: 108823
Summary: ranges::transform could be smarter with two sized
ranges
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108953
Bug ID: 108953
Summary: inefficient codegen for trivial equality
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68350
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104803
Bug ID: 104803
Summary: if consteval error from branch that isn't evaluated
anyway
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104803
--- Comment #3 from Barry Revzin ---
clang is also wrong. p(i) doesn't have to be a constant expression there. The
rule (http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.const#13) is "An immediate invocation shall
be a constant expression." but an expression is only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104803
--- Comment #4 from Barry Revzin ---
For instance, clang accepts this version:
consteval int p(int i) {
return i > 2;
}
constexpr auto none_of(int const* f, int const* l) -> bool {
for (; f != l; ++f) {
int i = *f;
if c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104803
--- Comment #6 from Barry Revzin ---
Ugh, sorry. You guys are right. gcc is correct to reject the example. Bad bug
report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88061
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104858
Bug ID: 104858
Summary: ranges::minmax double dereferences first
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95153
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105059
Bug ID: 105059
Summary: Inconsistency between paren- and brace-initialization
of a union with anonymous struct
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92396
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105195
Bug ID: 105195
Summary: spurious warning label defined but not used with if
constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105268
Bug ID: 105268
Summary: type/value mismatch when using variadic concept
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106371
Bug ID: 106371
Summary: Bogus narrowing conversion reported due to bitfield
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106596
Bug ID: 106596
Summary: Not a helpful diagnostic when putting things out of
order in a member function
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106631
Bug ID: 106631
Summary: Unhelpful diagnostic on variable template
specialization with unknown name
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106667
Bug ID: 106667
Summary: Diagnosing misuses of capturing lambda coroutines
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103919
Bug ID: 103919
Summary: The basic_string(const T&, size_type, size_type)
constructor is overconstrained
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100795
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103663
Bug ID: 103663
Summary: Diagnostic is missing multiple instantiation frames to
help point to where the problem happens
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103712
Bug ID: 103712
Summary: variable is not a constant expression because it is
used in its own initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103783
Bug ID: 103783
Summary: Ambiguous overload between constrained static member
and unconstrained non-static member
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102236
Bug ID: 102236
Summary: emplace_deref is not constexpr for join_view
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102263
Bug ID: 102263
Summary: Requesting enhanced warning on returning
pointer/reference to local
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102289
Bug ID: 102289
Summary: Concept declaration with multiple template-heads not
diagnosed
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102529
Bug ID: 102529
Summary: ctad for aliases fails in the presence of constraints
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102644
Bug ID: 102644
Summary: deduction failure when having default non-type
template parameters that are lambdas
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95384
--- Comment #4 from Barry Revzin ---
Here's another example of the same kind of issue
(https://godbolt.org/z/KWr9rMssj):
template
struct tagged_union {
tagged_union(T t) : index(0), a(t) { }
tagged_union(U u) : index(1), b(u) { }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
--- Comment #6 from Barry Revzin ---
The "real" answer is allowing constexpr placement new, but that obviously
doesn't help you right now.
But I think the helpful answer is that you can add a constructor to your
storage like storage(init_from_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105200
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102774
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105672
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105840
Bug ID: 105840
Summary: confusing diagnostic when naming the wrong class in a
constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105840
--- Comment #2 from Barry Revzin ---
I think something to this effect maybe?
:9:7: error: attempting to declare constructor for unrelated class 'A';
did you mean to use 'B'?
9 | A(int i);
| ^~
| B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105903
Bug ID: 105903
Summary: Missed optimization for __synth3way
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106151
Bug ID: 106151
Summary: Inconsistent optimization when defaulting aggregate vs
non-aggregate
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106151
--- Comment #2 from Barry Revzin ---
I guess that's like:
C++11/14: neither is an aggregate (base class).
C++17: both are aggregates.
C++20: Bar is an aggregate, but Foo is not (user-declared constructor).
But that really shouldn't affect the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106176
Bug ID: 106176
Summary: Compiler diagnostic doesn't show where it's coming
from in my code
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106354
Bug ID: 106354
Summary: Diagnostic could be more user friendly
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80943
--- Comment #3 from Barry Revzin ---
This is CWG 2327
(http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#2327).
It's still active, but gcc/clang's behavior (printing 2) seems like the
superior choice.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101883
Bug ID: 101883
Summary: class template argument deduction in non-type template
parameter allows explicit deduction guide
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101965
Bug ID: 101965
Summary: check in charconv is vacuously true
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49974
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114124
Bug ID: 114124
Summary: Rejected use of function parameter as non-type
template parameter in trailing-return-type
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104255
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114135
Bug ID: 114135
Summary: Diagnostic missing useful information for ranges code
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71962
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110793
Bug ID: 110793
Summary: regression in optimizing unused string
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110806
Bug ID: 110806
Summary: Suggest this-> for dependent base classes in more
contexts
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102609
--- Comment #14 from Barry Revzin ---
> I am finding myself realizing that implementing this as a member function and
> turning off member function bits seems to be more difficult than implementing
> it as a static function and implementing me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58
Bug ID: 58
Summary: diagnostics, colors, and std::same_as
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111299
Bug ID: 111299
Summary: lack of warning on dangling reference to temporary
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111485
Bug ID: 111485
Summary: Constraint mismatch on template template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111538
Bug ID: 111538
Summary: Unhelpful message when returning initializer list when
deducing the return type
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116696
Bug ID: 116696
Summary: function template not considered constexpr even with
-fimplicit-constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116696
--- Comment #5 from Barry Revzin ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109222
Bug ID: 109222
Summary: Confusing error for declaring an enum class with
unknown type
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109268
Bug ID: 109268
Summary: Guard variable still provided for static constinit
variable
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109362
Bug ID: 109362
Summary: codegen adds unnecessary extra add when reading atomic
member
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109362
--- Comment #1 from Barry Revzin ---
Sorry, in this reduced example, it doesn't actually consume an extra register -
only rdi is used.
In this slightly less reduced example:
#include
struct S {
std::atomic size;
std::atomic read_ptr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109362
--- Comment #4 from Barry Revzin ---
Awesome!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109396
Bug ID: 109396
Summary: Winit-self doesn't warn when std::move()-d
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88061
--- Comment #6 from Barry Revzin ---
Any action on this one?
A workaround right now is to change code that would ideally look like (which is
pretty clean in my opinion):
template
void foo() {
[[gnu::section(".meow")]] static int value = 0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109474
Bug ID: 109474
Summary: chunk_by doesn't work for ranges of proxy references
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109474
--- Comment #2 from Barry Revzin ---
Serves me right for only checking vector (which worked) and vector
(which didn't) and not bothering to check vector const (which also doesn't
work) and thus overly complicating the bug report.
I got too exci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109515
Bug ID: 109515
Summary: Diagnostic request: warning on out-of-order structured
bindings names
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109715
Bug ID: 109715
Summary: abi_tag attribute is not applied to variable templates
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
