--- Comment #8 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2009-01-02 17:08 ---
What is the status of this bug?
--
andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2009-01-02 17:08 ---
What is the status of this bug?
--
andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
lit-size=500 --split-size=500" compare
make[2]: Entering directory `/data/usr_local/xxxxxx/gccobj'
make[3]: Entering directory `/data/usr_local/xx/gccobj'
rm -f stage_current
make[3]: Leaving directory `/data/usr_local/xx/gccobj'
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
./ada/exp_aggr.o differs
make[2]: *** [compare] Fehler 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/data/usr_local/xx/gccobj'
make[1]: *** [stage3-bubble] Fehler 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/data/usr_local/xx/gccobj'
make: *** [all] Fehler 2
--
Summary: Bootstrap comparison failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--- Comment #4 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-09 08:43 ---
It worked well with r126900, but did not with r126976
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--- Comment #5 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-09 12:52 ---
It worked well with r126941, but did not with r126959
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--- Comment #6 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-09 16:07 ---
It worked well with r126947, but did not with r126951
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--- Comment #8 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-09 19:24 ---
The regression was caused by the following patch
New Revision: 126951
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126951
Log:
2007-07-26 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-09 19:33 ---
I'm now testing the patch from Comment #7.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--- Comment #10 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-10 05:48 ---
The patch works fine for me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--- Comment #13 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-15 18:50 ---
Fixed
--
andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #11 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-08-12 17:14 ---
Should the testcase go also in mainline?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35746
--- Comment #3 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-01-24 18:42 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg01138.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34603
--- Comment #7 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-02-14 00:35 ---
The patch is approved at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00392.html
--
andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-02-15 01:20 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00520.html
--
andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-02-16 03:39 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00584.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35153
--- Comment #2 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-02-16 03:39 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00575.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35022
--- Comment #1 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-03-21 16:07 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg01158.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35440
--- Comment #2 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-03-21 16:08 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg01158.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35332
--- Comment #11 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2009-02-25 10:33 ---
The target milestone 4.0.4 is wrong
--
andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39498
--- Comment #5 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2009-03-19 07:47 ---
With revision 144946 everything is okay.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39498
--- Comment #15 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2009-03-27 07:16 ---
Approved here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg01079.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35652
--- Comment #5 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2009-03-27 07:17 ---
Approved patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg01080.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37647
--- Comment #9 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2009-03-27 07:18 ---
Approved: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg01080.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29727
--- Comment #5 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2009-03-27 07:20 ---
Approved: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg01082.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36799
--- Comment #3 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2009-03-27 07:20 ---
Approved: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg01084.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38638
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29571
andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreasmeier80 at gmx dot
--- Comment #1 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-10-24 12:28 ---
The last commit of Olga was not complete. The two new files weren't commited
--
andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #1 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-11-05 12:03 ---
At http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg01572.html is a unreviewed
patch for this and other 7 bugs
--
andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34173
/vect
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-11-28 08:13 ---
It worked well at 2007/09/03, but is failing at leat since 2007/09/10.
So it may be caused by revision 128079:
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Sep 4 13:05:19 2007
New Revision: 128079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root
--- Comment #3 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-11-28 13:17 ---
Today I have checked out trunk newly. So my tree is fine.
The failures are also there.
I will send the new testresults shortly.
I'm using Suse 10.1. The version of dejagnu is 1.4.4.
I see only unusual erro
--- Comment #4 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-11-28 14:12 ---
The new results are at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-11/msg01515.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34253
--- Comment #5 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-11-28 22:12 ---
It worked well in revision r128078
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34253
--- Comment #6 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-11-29 07:41 ---
It worked also well in revision r128079. I'm going to do further tests to find
the causing commit.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34253
--- Comment #7 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-11-29 17:05 ---
It fails in 128121, works in 128079
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34253
--- Comment #8 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-11-30 15:07 ---
So some new informations.
In revision 128088 it is fine, but it fails in revision 128109. I have no
information for the revisions between, because of the commit in 128089 I have
about 15000 failures in the C
--- Comment #5 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-01-12 19:06 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg00482.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33964
--- Comment #6 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-01-12 19:08 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg00491.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34052
--- Comment #7 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-01-12 19:09 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg00149.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34051
--- Comment #5 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-05-09 13:18 ---
Perhaps it is a good idea to add the testcase to the testsuite
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34496
: major
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36311
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
--- Comment #2 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-07-16 09:52 ---
For me it was working in revision 137687
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36830
--- Comment #5 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-07-21 12:55 ---
For me it is working today
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36830
46 matches
Mail list logo
