--- Comment #8 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 17:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=11334)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11334&action=view)
fix typo in errormessage in verify_cgraph_node()
Just as a sidenote.. There is a typo in the error mes
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 17:23 ---
for reference, the backtrace on i686:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0820096f in fold_convert (type=0x0, arg=0xb71527fc)
at ../../../src/gcc-4.2/gcc/fold-const.c:1991
1991 if
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 17:30 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> If you ask for *.i files, why don't you provide a upload button in bugzilla?
>
There is a "Create an attachment" link above.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27431
n: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, error-recovery
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
BugsThisDependsOn: 19292
http://g
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 16:02 ---
Known to work: g77-3.4
Known to fail: gfortran >= 4.0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27457
ummary: Shell compatibility problem
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
G
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 18:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=11411)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11411&action=view)
use operator '=' instead of '==' for test
Bootstrap is still in progress, but a man
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: alphaev56-dec-osf5.1a
GCC host triplet: alphaev56-dec-osf5.1a
GCC target
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-09 07:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=11418)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11418&action=view)
check if BUILD_INFO was requested explicitely
2006-05-09 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-09 08:02 ---
2006-05-09 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR/27501
* mkconfig.sh: Use operator '=' for test
This patch fixes the build failure on OSF5.1a,
please apply.
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-09 08:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=11419)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11419&action=view)
Don't build info pages if makeinfo is too old
Corrected syntax.
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-09 15:33 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=11419)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11419&action=view) [edit]
> Don't build info pages if makeinfo is too old
>
> Co
uct: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov/profile
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 10:49 ---
Subject: Bug 27501
Author: aldot
Date: Sun May 14 10:48:49 2006
New Revision: 113758
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113758
Log:
2006-05-14 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 09:28 ---
[RFC][PATCH] is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-04/msg00266.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21061
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-19 17:29 ---
This also fails on the gcc-4_1-branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27516
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|treelang|bootstrap
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 11:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=11490)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11490&action=view)
print error invalid form for SUBROUTINE at
Not tested.
2006-05-21 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAIL
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 12:16 ---
Setting Target Milestone to 4.1.1.
Ok for trunk and the 4.1 branch?
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 13:10 ---
Subject: Bug 25776
Author: aldot
Date: Sun May 21 13:10:37 2006
New Revision: 113952
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113952
Log:
ACKed by Jan Hubicka in http://gcc.gnu.org/
--- Comment #7 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 17:46 ---
> Wouldn't it be better just to modify gcc/Makefile.in to do:
>
> ifneq($(BUILD_INFO),)
> info: $(INFOFILES) lang.info @GENINSRC@ srcinfo lang.srcinfo
> else
> info:
> fi
>
> Then,
--- Comment #9 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 20:11 ---
>
> Your original patch is OK for 4.1 -- but I would like the fix I
> suggested for 4.2. Also, we don't like to fix a problem on a release
> branch without also having a fix in mainline.
>
&g
--- Comment #5 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-22 14:14 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> for reference, the backtrace on i686:
on i686 these flags were used for the ICE:
-march=pentium4 -mtune=pentium -O2 -ftree-vectorize
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org chan
--- Comment #10 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-22 17:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=11494)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11494&action=view)
fix MAKEINFO invocation for gcc-4_1-branch
I cannot test this patch right now since i have to bootstrap
explicit assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reporte
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 17:19 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Bernhard,
>
> Your patch only addresses one aspect of the problem.
> Consider
>
> function _foo
> entry _bar
> end function
>
Is it sufficient to print an
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28299
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail
4/i686_toolchain/gcc-4.4.0/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:4718
#15 0x084799c1 in emit_pointer_definition (def=)
at
/there/src/buildroot.git.pentium4/i686_toolchain/gcc-4.4.0/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:4718
#16 0x084799c1 in emit_pointer_definition (def=)
at
/there/src/buildroot.git.pentium4/i686_toolchain/gcc-4.4.0/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:4718
[snip gazillions of :4718]
--
Summary: [4.4 Regression] ICE in tree-ssa-struct-alias when
compiling grub-0.97
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38445
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 15:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=16851)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16851&action=view)
preprocess source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38445
nt: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38460
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=16856)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16856&action=view)
unreduced file1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38460
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=16857)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16857&action=view)
unreduced file2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38460
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=16858)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16858&action=view)
unreduced file3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38460
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=16859)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16859&action=view)
output of unreduced input
/there/src/buildroot.git.pentium4/i686_build/staging/usr/bin/i686-linux-uclibc-
--- Comment #5 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=16860)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16860&action=view)
reduced file1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38460
--- Comment #6 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=16861)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16861&action=view)
reduced file3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38460
--- Comment #7 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=16862)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16862&action=view)
reduced file3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38460
--- Comment #8 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=16863)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16863&action=view)
output of reduced input
/there/src/buildroot.git.pentium4/i686_build/staging/usr/bin/i686-linux-uclibc-
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-14 15:30 ---
Sounds a bit like the problem from comment #0 is a duplicate or related to
PR31537 and/or PR35034 ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37865
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 11:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=17098)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17098&action=view)
patch for trunk to remove references to the removed
__builtin_ia32_{pextrw,pinsrw}
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 11:02 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20049 ***
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 11:02 ---
*** Bug 37250 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 11:13 ---
As previously said on irc, this is a duplicate of PR20049.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38836
--- Comment #5 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 11:33 ---
Also applies to the 4_3-branch.
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-04 13:24 ---
Well, without it fixed it's impossible to build libgfortran (and other apps)
with combine, which would be a very nice thing to have.
The sample patch above exposed no regressions fwiw.
--
http://gcc.gn
--- Comment #7 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-04 18:18 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> movzbl 18(%esp), %eax
>
> could be used in this particular case.
4.3.3 onward seem to do that. Fixed?
$ for i in 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5.orig-HEAD;do printf "###
--- Comment #6 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 16:19 ---
CC'ing honza as i386 maintainer
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #16 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 16:27 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > Created an attachment (id=16113)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16113&action=view) [edit]
> > Updated doubleint
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||16996
nThis
--- Comment #10 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-07 16:54 ---
4.3.3 does not simplify it, 4.4.0 onward do.
for reference
4.3.3:
Substituing values and folding statements
Constants propagated: 0
Copies propagated: 0
Predicates folded: 0
ior (bD.1193
--- Comment #24 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-07 22:51 ---
Nick,
As mentioned in #22 the following hunk that was in the patch was not applied:
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/linux-elf.h b/gcc/config/arm/linux-elf.h
index 07455ee..d8e65d2 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/linux
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #17 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 08:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=18044)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18044&action=view)
Bootstraps and regtests
bootstrapped and regtested all default languages with no new regressions.
TODO:
--- Comment #8 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 15:05 ---
Important reminder from steven from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33828#c13
stevenb> GCC should not hoist up further than up to the first common dominator.
i.e. "..can be Hoisted to B"
--- Comment #5 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 13:15 ---
I'm bootstrapping and will test the patch below (gcc.gfortran.pr25486.0.diff).
I'm uncertain on the expected results of the testcase above for
-ffixed-line-length-none, so i'm not changing the behaviou
--- Comment #6 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 14:54 ---
The patch does fix it, the behaviour of line-length-none is documented and
expected.
trunk with the patch gives:
$ gfortran-4.2-HEAD -o pr25486 gfortran.pr25486.f
$ ./pr25486
1234567
--- Comment #9 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 16:07 ---
I had trouble with the testcase:
I wanted to have only one .F file with three dg-options but this didn't work
out.
I'm about to check the patch in during the next few hours.
Really sorry for the long
--- Comment #10 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 16:38 ---
Subject: Bug 25486
Author: aldot
Date: Wed Jan 11 16:38:42 2006
New Revision: 109591
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109591
Log:
gcc/fortran:
2006-01-11 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAI
--- Comment #11 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 17:06 ---
Subject: Bug 25486
Author: aldot
Date: Wed Jan 11 17:06:44 2006
New Revision: 109592
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109592
Log:
gcc/fortran:
2006-01-11 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 17:08 ---
Subject: Bug 25486
Author: aldot
Date: Wed Jan 11 17:07:55 2006
New Revision: 109593
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109593
Log:
2006-01-11 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
argc=8191, argv=0x29) at
../../../src/gcc-4.1/gcc/main.c:35
--
Summary: ICE on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 21:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=10626)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10626&action=view)
testcase label_3.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25756
--- Comment #14 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 21:37 ---
Sure, will fix the changelog tomorrow, sorry!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25486
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 21:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=10627)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10627&action=view)
testcase label_4.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25756
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 21:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=10628)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10628&action=view)
testcase label_5.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25756
--- Comment #15 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 12:28 ---
Subject: Bug 25486
Author: aldot
Date: Thu Jan 12 12:28:00 2006
New Revision: 109640
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109640
Log:
2006-01-12 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-13 22:15 ---
Should the warning be made consistent between fixed- and free form?
Both the gfc_warning vs. gfc_warning_now and the strings are not consistent.
Fixed Form has:
gfc_warning ("Statement label in blank line wi
--- Comment #16 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-13 22:19 ---
Fix confirmed by Steve Kargl, closing.
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 12:53 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Subject: Re: externally_visible attribute not effective with prior
> declaration
> of symbol.
>
> > Is there any reason why process_function_and_variable_attributes is
--- Comment #15 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 13:15 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Subject: Re: externally_visible attribute not effective with prior
> declaration
> of symbol.
>
> >
> > If this is really true, then there are several bu
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 22:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=12132)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12132&action=view)
preprocessed from a testcase of plain gettext-0.15
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28839
ys
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28887
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 12:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=12147)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12147&action=view)
original unreduced testcase
Initial args used for unreduced testcase were:
gcc -O2 -fPIC -ftree-loop-o
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 18:11 ---
Also fails for native i686-linux-gnu with
gcc-4.2-20060829 -march=i686 -msse -O1 -fprefetch-loop-arrays
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 18:26 ---
-pedantic-errors also has no effect. From a quick look, it does not occur in
fortran/* at all and should probably be removed.
I'm preparing an updated patch to add proper -Werror support that emits
'Wa
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 17:13 ---
This regression is a really severe defect in daily use.
Note that this works with gcc-2.95.4 but fails with any 3.x and 4.x i have.
$ gcc-2.95 -o pr.o -std=c99 -x assembler-with-cpp -c pr25993.S && objdump
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 17:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=12284)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12284&action=view)
Add diagnostic message
Attaching a copy of the patch from the initial bugreport.
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 18:02 ---
Not worth fixing.
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25993
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 20:07 ---
Note that there are other (wrong) occurances of the non gfc_*() warnings in
trans-decl.c.
These other "warning()" calls too should be converted to the respective
gfc_warning*() calls.
--
http://g
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 11:46 ---
Current trunk gives:
# -Wall
In file unused.f90:1
subroutine a(x)
1
Warning: Unused variable x declared at (1)
# -Wall -W
In file unused.f90:1
subroutine a(x)
1
Warning: Unused
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 11:54 ---
To me this sounds more like a middle-end issue. The ME apparently doesn't have
means to use language specific diagnosics hooks.
Also see comment #2 for PR24784 at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-28 00:28 ---
on i686, cross compiling for i586, i see:
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile
/home/cow/src/buildroot.mine/build_i586/staging_dir/bin/i586-linux-uclibc-gcc
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I/home/cow/src/buildroot.mine
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on frtl-abstract- |ICE on frtl-abstract-
|sequences and mthumb
rds: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30620
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-28 11:45 ---
I assume that this works with 4.1 but did not verify. If so, that's obviously a
[4.2 Regression]
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30486
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-04 14:53 ---
4.1.2 prerelease-20070128 fails on --enable-intermodule too:
buildroot.arm/toolchain_build_arm/gcc-4.1.2-20070128/gcc/config/arm/arm.c -o
lib
backend.o \
-DBASEVER="\"4.1.2\"" -DDA
--- Comment #8 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-08 17:30 ---
I was seeing this bug when building with BOOT_CFLAGS=-march=nocona\
-mtune=nocona\ -O2 that later ICE'd for ../gcc/libgcc2.c:557
I don't have access to that x86_64 with ubuntu anymore so cannot check if
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 19:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=13030)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13030&action=view)
add gcov-iov.h to the prerequisited of libbackend.o
Patch against the gcc-4_2-branch
--
http://gcc.
d, diagnostic, build
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30762
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 10:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=13031)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13031&action=view)
reduced from gcc/double-int.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30762
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 10:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=13032)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13032&action=view)
reduced from tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30762
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 10:26 ---
May be related to 29478 according to apinski. This one blocks compilation
rather than just generating an unpleasant warning, tough.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30762
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 10:28 ---
Works with
gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 11:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=13033)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13033&action=view)
smaller testcase for the tree-ssa-loop-niter part
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #6 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 11:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=13034)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13034&action=view)
minimal testcase file 1
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|
1 - 100 of 374 matches
Mail list logo
