Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hello
In below code I used class A and a class B which is derived from A. Now, I did
dynamic_cast I got segmentation fault. same behaviors I observed on ARM also
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hello
I am Getting "internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1375"
during RTL optimization,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93730
--- Comment #2 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
Working on Arm architecture.
I am trying to reproduce the same with sample test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93730
--- Comment #3 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
Please find test application to reproduce this issue
bash-3.2# g++ -fdump-tree-all /tmp/akhilesh.cpp
during RTL pass: expand
/tmp/akhilesh.cpp: In function 'int main()':
/
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
Target Milestone: ---
when i use -flto "weak symbol" are converted to "t".
I really don't know whether this is bug or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91252
--- Comment #3 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
When I used binutils version 2.32 we are getting the same result
@akhilesh-ubuntu:~/akhilesh/lto$ gcc -flto -o nornal myapp.c
@akhilesh-ubuntu:~/akhilesh/lto$ ./bin/nm -C ./nornal | grep power
004
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at
gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84208
--- Comment #2 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
> Does it work on non-changed gcc 7.2 on arm?
Not yet verified because unable to cross compile gcc 7.2.
> And with arm do mean arm-linux-gnueabi as the target or aarch64-linux-gnu?
I am using arm-*-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84208
--- Comment #4 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
Please find Patch and test Case
I tried but unable to attached patch as Attachment :(
My Changes for address-use-after-scope which is working for X86 but not for ARM
target
---
gcc/asan.c | 30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84208
--- Comment #5 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
Please Mark this bug ID as invalid with the same patch I am able to run on ARM
also there was issue in My setup only (Sorry for the noise).
Test results on ARM (gcc 6.2.1)
sh-3.2# out_of_scope
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hello
I am working On ARM target: in that
./gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-4.c test case getting fail when we
use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90721
--- Comment #1 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
One more observation same test case getting PASS on x86
root@akhilesh-ubuntu:/home/akhilesh.k/gcc-arm-src-snapshot-8.3-2019.03/gcc/testsuite#
gcc ./gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-4.c -flto -fgnu89
bstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
Target Milestone: ---
While libstdc++ tests verification i found
below summary report
Is this expected ?
Or fixed in latest versions
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81480
Akhilesh Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
Host|
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at
gcc dot gnu.org
Target
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hello
with gcc 13.1 open source RISC-V Toolchain I observed "unknown relocation type
57
: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at
gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111620
--- Comment #2 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
with 110036 (CHECK failed) issue is fixed, but Even after patch ASAN unable to
detect corruption like "Use_after_free(heap)","Heap buffer overflow","Stack
buffer overflow" and "Use after scope"
some feat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117049
--- Comment #3 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
Minor correction(above logs pls ignore) this can be reproduce with below kernel
module but from simple application unable to reproduce.
akhilesh.k@B0110LHG:~/Activity/L_sections/module$
riscv64-unknown-li
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi
`.LFB`, `.LVL`, `.LBB`, and `.LBE` are internal labels is expected in compiler
generated asm file since these are internal labels
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117049
--- Comment #4 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I am trying to understand the issue here.
>
> Are you saying the local labels are not removed while assembly and show up
> in objdump's output?
for risc-v in
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
Target Milestone: ---
During bit manipulation verification I observed grevw, greviw instructions are
not unimplemented.
https
23 matches
Mail list logo
