[Bug libstdc++/56557] New: Link error about `std::fstream' or `std::stringstream' with `-flto' and `-rdynamic' options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56557 Bug #: 56557 Summary: Link error about `std::fstream' or `std::stringstream' with `-flto' and `-rdynamic' options Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.

[Bug libstdc++/56834] New: Errors in with --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace and -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56834 Bug #: 56834 Summary: Errors in with --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace and -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Versio

[Bug c++/56913] New: [C++11] SFINAE for ill-formed pointer-to-member operators with incompatible ref-qualifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56913 Bug #: 56913 Summary: [C++11] SFINAE for ill-formed pointer-to-member operators with incompatible ref-qualifiers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug libstdc++/54297] New: [C++11] Segmentation fault with std::async and released shared state

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54297 Bug #: 54297 Summary: [C++11] Segmentation fault with std::async and released shared state Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/54744] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault, by dependent base, member typedef and ctor-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54744 Bug #: 54744 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault, by dependent base, member typedef and ctor-initializer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Versi

[Bug c++/54891] New: [C++11] lambda-expression and explicit type conversion (cast notation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54891 Bug #: 54891 Summary: [C++11] lambda-expression and explicit type conversion (cast notation) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status

[Bug c++/54975] New: [C++11] cv-qualifiers of typedef-name are ignored in lambda expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54975 Bug #: 54975 Summary: [C++11] cv-qualifiers of typedef-name are ignored in lambda expression Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status

[Bug c++/57470] New: Wrong line number in diagnostic message

++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ai.azuma at gmail dot com Created attachment 30225 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30225&action=edit Output of -v option and preprocessed source with GCC 4.9.0 20130526 GCC 4.8.1 20130523 and 4.9.0 20130526

[Bug c++/57471] New: [C++11] Bizarre error for template parameter pack

: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ai.azuma at gmail dot com Created attachment 30226 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30226&action=edit Output of -v option and preprocessed source GCC 4.9.0 20130526 rejects the following val

[Bug libstdc++/58148] New: [C++11] Fails to insert iterator range into sequence container with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG when conversion is needed

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ai.azuma at gmail dot com Created attachment 30644 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30644&

[Bug c++/50324] New: SFINAE does not handle the object creation of an incomplete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50324 Bug #: 50324 Summary: SFINAE does not handle the object creation of an incomplete type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51046] New: ICE by unexpanded template param pack in range-based for

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51046 Bug #: 51046 Summary: ICE by unexpanded template param pack in range-based for Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51047] New: [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle errors of ambiguous base members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51047 Bug #: 51047 Summary: [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle errors of ambiguous base members Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53401] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on infinite argument deduction of constexpr templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53401 Bug #: 53401 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on infinite argument deduction of constexpr templates Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/53402] New: [C++11] non-inline namespace can be wrongly re-opened as inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53402 Bug #: 53402 Summary: [C++11] non-inline namespace can be wrongly re-opened as inline Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53488] Incorrect code generated when capturing a constant by reference in a lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53488 Ai Azuma changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ai.azuma at gmail dot com --- Comment #9 from

[Bug c++/53816] New: internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6419, with -std=c++11 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53816 Bug #: 53816 Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6419, with -std=c++11 opti

[Bug c++/53816] internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6419, with -std=c++11 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53816 --- Comment #1 from Ai Azuma 2012-06-30 06:34:40 UTC --- Created attachment 27722 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27722 Output of -v option

[Bug c++/53954] New: [C++11] Undefined reference to non-odr-used static const member variable of variadic class template in DSO with -flto and -Wl,--export-dynamic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53954 Bug #: 53954 Summary: [C++11] Undefined reference to non-odr-used static const member variable of variadic class template in DSO with -flto and -Wl,--export-dynamic Classification:

[Bug c++/53954] [C++11] Undefined reference to non-odr-used static const member variable of variadic class template in DSO with -flto and -Wl,--export-dynamic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53954 Ai Azuma changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54158] New: Silently accepts sizeof to non-static member without object in C++03 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54158 Bug #: 54158 Summary: Silently accepts sizeof to non-static member without object in C++03 mode Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCON

[Bug c++/54158] [4.6, 4.7, 4.8 Regression] Silently accepts sizeof to non-static member without object in C++03 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54158 --- Comment #5 from Ai Azuma 2012-08-03 02:05:45 UTC --- Well, I'm a bit confused. So I would like to make sure some points. > Ah, it was changed by a DR > (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#613) not a C++11 > proposal

[Bug c++/54158] [4.6, 4.7, 4.8 Regression] Silently accepts sizeof to non-static member without object in C++03 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54158 --- Comment #7 from Ai Azuma 2012-08-03 08:21:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Right O.K. Then, this behavior makes sense. Thanks for the clarification!

[Bug c++/54191] New: [C++11] SFINAE does not handle conversion to inaccessible base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54191 Bug #: 54191 Summary: [C++11] SFINAE does not handle conversion to inaccessible base Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54191] [C++11] SFINAE does not handle conversion to inaccessible base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54191 --- Comment #1 from Ai Azuma 2012-08-07 11:19:03 UTC --- Created attachment 27955 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27955 Some test cases for SFINAE on conversion to inaccessible base

[Bug c++/54191] [C++11] SFINAE does not handle conversion to inaccessible base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54191 --- Comment #2 from Ai Azuma 2012-08-07 11:21:36 UTC --- Created attachment 27956 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27956 Output of -v option

[Bug c++/52269] New: [C++11]Body of constexpr function templates instantiated too eagerly in unevaluated operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52269 Bug #: 52269 Summary: [C++11]Body of constexpr function templates instantiated too eagerly in unevaluated operands Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug c++/52369] New: Const-qualified non-class base member and defaulted default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52369 Bug #: 52369 Summary: Const-qualified non-class base member and defaulted default constructor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug c++/52371] New: [C++11] ICE in noexcept with constexpr conversion function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52371 Bug #: 52371 Summary: [C++11] ICE in noexcept with constexpr conversion function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52371] [C++11] ICE in noexcept with constexpr conversion function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52371 --- Comment #1 from Ai Azuma 2012-02-24 13:54:18 UTC --- Created attachment 26741 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26741 Output of -v option and preprocessed file

[Bug c++/52371] [C++11] ICE in noexcept with constexpr conversion function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52371 --- Comment #2 from Ai Azuma 2012-02-24 14:01:41 UTC --- I'm sorry. I forgot to write that this ICE appears with -std=c++11 option.

[Bug c++/52374] New: [C++11] Fails to transform id-expression into dependent base member access in lambda expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52374 Bug #: 52374 Summary: [C++11] Fails to transform id-expression into dependent base member access in lambda expression Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug c++/52380] New: [C++11] Number of variadic template arguments wrongly interpreted in class template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52380 Bug #: 52380 Summary: [C++11] Number of variadic template arguments wrongly interpreted in class template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Sta

[Bug c++/52440] New: [C++11] Wrong template argument deduction/substitution failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52440 Bug #: 52440 Summary: [C++11] Wrong template argument deduction/substitution failures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52613] New: [C++11] ICE with noexcept in lambda expression in member function of class template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52613 Bug #: 52613 Summary: [C++11] ICE with noexcept in lambda expression in member function of class template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Sta

[Bug c/52977] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault with `-x c-header' or `-x cxx-header' option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52977 Bug #: 52977 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault with `-x c-header' or `-x cxx-header' option Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug libstdc++/59247] New: Bootstrap fails due to errors in libstdc++ sources with `--enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace'

IRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ai.azuma at gmail dot com I have come across errors in stage 1 build of libstdc++ when trying to build GCC 4.9-20131117 with the following com

[Bug c++/51148] New: [C++0x] Unexpanded template param packs wrongly accepted in friend class declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51148 Bug #: 51148 Summary: [C++0x] Unexpanded template param packs wrongly accepted in friend class declarations Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 S

[Bug c++/51161] New: [C++0x] Illegal static_cast to rvalue reference to ambiguous base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51161 Bug #: 51161 Summary: [C++0x] Illegal static_cast to rvalue reference to ambiguous base class Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug c++/51184] New: Abstract class in function return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51184 Bug #: 51184 Summary: Abstract class in function return type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/51185] New: [C++0x] false-positive results of std::is_constructible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51185 Bug #: 51185 Summary: [C++0x] false-positive results of std::is_constructible Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug c++/51253] New: [C++11][DR 1030] Evaluation order (sequenced-before relation) among intializer-clauses in braced-init-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253 Bug #: 51253 Summary: [C++11][DR 1030] Evaluation order (sequenced-before relation) among intializer-clauses in braced-init-list Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version

[Bug c++/55335] New: [DR 5] cv-qualifiers of destination type in copy-initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55335 Bug #: 55335 Summary: [DR 5] cv-qualifiers of destination type in copy-initialization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCON

[Bug c++/55526] New: [C++11] Irrelevant error message for function parameter wrongly used in noexcept specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55526 Bug #: 55526 Summary: [C++11] Irrelevant error message for function parameter wrongly used in noexcept specifier Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug sanitizer/55799] New: AddressSanitizer with `-pg' option results in spurious errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 Bug #: 55799 Summary: AddressSanitizer with `-pg' option results in spurious errors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug lto/55848] New: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed (with `-flto' and `-fopenmp')

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55848 Bug #: 55848 Summary: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed (with `-flto' and `-fopenmp') Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug libstdc++/55861] New: [C++11] `std::shared_future::get' is not const-qualified

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55861 Bug #: 55861 Summary: [C++11] `std::shared_future::get' is not const-qualified Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/64967] New: [5 Regression] Bootstrap fails due to errors in libstdc++ sources with `--enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace'

rsion: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ai.azuma at gmail dot com Compile errors occur in stage 1 build of libstdc++ when trying to build GCC 5-201

[Bug sanitizer/63638] New: [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in asan_expand_check_ifn (with -fsanitize=address)

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ai.azuma at gmail dot com CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at

[Bug c++/64106] New: [5 Regression][C++14] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_store_expression

: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ai.azuma at gmail dot com Created attachment 34133 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34133&action=edit Output of -v option and preprocessed file The fo

[Bug libstdc++/61643] New: [C++11] std::uncaught_exception returns wrong values after std::rethrow_if_nested

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ai.azuma at gmail dot com The following program should terminate successfully. //= #include #include

[Bug c++/63430] New: [5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ai.azuma at gmail dot com Created attachment 33635 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33635&action=edit Output of -v option and preprocessed file The following valid code

[Bug c++/63454] New: [5 Regression] internal compiler error: canonical types differ for identical types

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ai.azuma at gmail dot com Created attachment 33645 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33645&action=edit Output of -v option and preprocessed fi

[Bug c++/63454] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63454 --- Comment #3 from Ai Azuma --- (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #1) > I don't see any ICE for gcc 5.0.0 20141004 (experimental). Could you retry > that one? I am still seeing the ICE with 5.0.0 20141005 (experimental).

[Bug libstdc++/62258] uncaught_exception() equals to `true' after rethrow_exception()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258 Ai Azuma changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ai.azuma at gmail dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug libstdc++/61643] [C++11] std::uncaught_exception returns wrong values after std::rethrow_if_nested

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61643 Ai Azuma changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/61643] [C++11] std::uncaught_exception returns wrong values after std::rethrow_if_nested

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61643 Ai Azuma changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Ai Azuma ---

[Bug libstdc++/62258] uncaught_exception() equals to `true' after rethrow_exception()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258 --- Comment #5 from Ai Azuma --- *** Bug 61643 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***