http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60901
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
I'm on Easter vacation this week, will take a look after that.
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Created attachment 32692
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32692&action=edit
draft patch
An interesting case so I'd leave more detailed notes. We are scheduling a
regio
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
The ix86_dependencies_evaluation_hook has the following code:
26230 /* Assume that region is SCC, i.e. all immediate
predecessors
26231of non-head block are in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60901
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed May 14 09:46:26 2014
New Revision: 210414
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210414&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/60901
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_dependenci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60901
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60866
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed May 14 12:09:02 2014
New Revision: 210420
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210420&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/60866
* sel-sched-ir (sel_init_new_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60866
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60901
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Sorry, Uros asked me to wait a bit while the patch is on trunk and at the time
the 4.8 branch got freezed, so I've postponed backporting. I will take care of
it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60901
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jun 3 09:20:36 2014
New Revision: 211164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211164&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-05-14 Andrey Belevantsev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60866
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jun 3 09:25:39 2014
New Revision: 211165
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211165&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-05-14 Andrey Belevantsev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60901
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jun 3 10:06:39 2014
New Revision: 211168
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211168&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-05-14 Andrey Belevantsev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60901
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60866
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jun 3 10:08:58 2014
New Revision: 211169
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211169&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-05-14 Andrey Belevantsev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60866
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57422
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jan 21 10:22:07 2014
New Revision: 206876
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206876&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013-12-23 Andrey Belevantsev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57422
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jan 21 12:31:35 2014
New Revision: 206880
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206880&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013-12-23 Andrey Belevantsev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2014-01-22
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Created attachment 31915
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31915&
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #7)
> Testresults: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-01/msg01781.html
>
> No regressions, and g++.dg/opt/pr48272.C now passes.
Thank you, my own run is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48272
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> I'd say if (plus:SI (symbol_ref:SI ...) (const_int ...)) not surrounded by
> (const:SI ) is considered invalid IL, then trying to workaround cprop bug in
> so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57662
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Feb 3 12:00:23 2014
New Revision: 207421
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207421&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/57662
* sel-sched.c (code_motion_path_d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60043
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60043
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
And indeed, if we change the test case to
int foo (long long *a, short *b, int n)
{
int k = *b + 1000;
*a = (long long) (n * 100);
return k;
}
then we get the desired anti-dependency because alia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60043
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Hmm, oops. The testcase has a true dependence ... ;) Still, isn't the
> code in sched_analyze_2 wrong? Or are pending_mems all before 't'?
Yes (to second
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19377
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19377
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to fabien from comment #10)
> The testcase is not valid, as a using declaration shall refer to a direct
> base class, which is not the case in 'using ns::Base::i' (the namespace ns
> does not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60086
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> ...
> doesn't reorder those is that RA allocates the same register. With -O3
> -mavx -fselective-scheduling2 the stores are also changed, but we end up
> wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60086
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Forgot to mention that we end up scheduling this block in 21 cycles while the
regular scheduling needs 24. Not that it's so important though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Feb 18 05:41:29 2014
New Revision: 207832
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/58960
* haifa-sched.c (alloc_global_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
I'm out of office today, so I'll have a look properly tomorrow, but...
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> So perhaps:
> --- gcc/haifa-sched.c 2014-02-18 08:18:53.045024428
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60268
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
I forgot the single block regions case, so the nr_regions_initial init should
be moved to the bottom of sched_rgn_init.
The check before free_global_sched_pr
||2014-02-21
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Confirmed, I'm at it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Here the assert added while fixing PR 57422 means that we should always be able
to schedule the current fence instruction. The PR 57422 analysis was good but
for the added assert we should make one more
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60268
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Feb 24 05:57:02 2014
New Revision: 208066
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208066&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2014-02-24 Andrey Belevantsev
PR rtl-optimization/60268
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60268
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5)
> The PR is fixed by the patch in comment 2 without regression, see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-02/msg01688.html.
>
> Thanks for the qu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Feb 25 06:35:09 2014
New Revision: 208109
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208109&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/60292
* sel-sched.c (fill_vec_av_set): Do no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Sorry, I've got swamped by work and never got around to this. I will try
harder now :)
||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Fixed since 5.0 and works for 4.9 (no offending code there).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64411
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Created attachment 37432
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37432&action=edit
patch
In this case, we get an inconsistency between the sched-deps interface, saying
we can't move an insn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63384
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Created attachment 37464
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37464&action=edit
patch for gcc trunk (applies to gcc-5 too)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
I've debugged it on gcc-5.1.0 since the picture on trunk is different. Thanks
Jakub for great explanations, it was not easy to get to the root problem.
We speculate an insn (the load in your listing) b
||2015-06-25
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
I will take a look in a week or so when I'll be back in office.
||2011.03.16 07:33:21
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-03-16
07:33:21 UTC ---
Confirmed, I
||2011.03.16 07:36:05
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-03-16
07:36:05 UTC ---
Confirmed. I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-03-21
12:07:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Andrey,
>
> I was just looking at PR 48191, a bug submitted against GCC 4.5.2. It looks
> like it is caused by the same problem that this patch fixes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-03-22
12:34:02 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Mar 22 12:33:53 2011
New Revision: 171286
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171286
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48143
* con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-03-22
15:58:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 23751
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23751
Current patch
The ICE turned out to be the new one. We are updating the data sets on the
bookk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-03-26
11:40:54 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Sat Mar 26 11:40:51 2011
New Revision: 171555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171555
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48144
* sel-sched-i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-03-31
11:44:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Do you plan to backport this to 4.6 branch?
Sure, I was just waiting for 4.6.0 to take off.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-01
11:07:47 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Apr 1 11:07:44 2011
New Revision: 171825
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171825
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-03-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45570
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
06:50:12 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:50:08 2011
New Revision: 172077
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172077
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-10-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
06:51:52 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:51:49 2011
New Revision: 172078
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172078
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518
--- Comment #15 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
06:52:33 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:52:29 2011
New Revision: 172079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172079
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
06:53:48 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:53:44 2011
New Revision: 172080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172080
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46602
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
06:54:25 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:54:23 2011
New Revision: 172081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172081
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46585
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
06:56:50 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:56:47 2011
New Revision: 172082
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172082
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45354
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
06:58:31 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:58:29 2011
New Revision: 172083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172083
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
06:59:21 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:59:19 2011
New Revision: 172084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172084
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46875
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
07:00:15 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:00:10 2011
New Revision: 172085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172085
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46649
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
07:01:30 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:01:25 2011
New Revision: 172086
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172086
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47036
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
07:02:40 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:02:34 2011
New Revision: 172087
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172087
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46521
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
07:04:10 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:04:02 2011
New Revision: 172088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172088
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-01-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46522
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
07:04:10 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:04:02 2011
New Revision: 172088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172088
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-01-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #29 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
07:04:09 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:04:02 2011
New Revision: 172088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172088
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
07:05:19 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:05:16 2011
New Revision: 172089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172089
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-03-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48215
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48442
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2011.04.07 07:45:54
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
08:00:28 UTC ---
And some of our sel-sched-ir.h helpers can be moved to cfgloop.c as well (e.g.
get_loop_exit_edges_unique_dests).
||2011.04.07 08:48:57
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org,
||vmakarov at redhat dot com
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
08:48:57
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-07
12:07:29 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 12:07:24 2011
New Revision: 172097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172097
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-03-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #15 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-08
06:42:22 UTC ---
Just to remind the middle-end folks that stage 1 is a fine time for deciding on
middle-end volatile semantics, before we forget about this for another 6 months
:)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48272
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-08
13:25:35 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Apr 8 13:25:29 2011
New Revision: 172183
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172183
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48272
* sc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #16 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-27
08:10:12 UTC ---
The patch from 4.5 can likely be ported to 4.4 somewhat easy, however, it is
big enough and I am not sure that there will be any more releases off
4.4-branch. If there is such a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-27
10:04:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 24112
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24112
backported patch
Good. Then attached is the initial backport, I have just verified that it
pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-05-06
06:24:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Sounds like either ia64 must clear the disable-schedule flag on all basic
> blocks, or sms must be fixed to set TImode on the insns as needed.
Or sched
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-05-06
12:33:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Or schedule_block could have a mode of preserving the existing insn order,
> > which can also be useful for testing purpose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-05-17
14:20:52 UTC ---
That patch is most likely just exposed a sel-sched bug or a target bug. I will
be looking at it tomorrow.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-09-28
11:47:33 UTC ---
Thanks for the test, it shows one more case of using issue_rate that I have
missed. We need to distinguish between the stalls caused by data dependencies
and by lack of functiona
201 - 300 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
