Andreas Schwab, le dim. 24 nov. 2024 15:15:43 +0100, a ecrit:
> On Nov 24 2024, Sergey Bugaev wrote:
> > So are you saying that we always must mark any asm statement that
> > might transfer control somewhere else w/o returning as 'asm goto',
> > even if we don't actually need to jump to any of the
Samuel Thibault, le dim. 24 nov. 2024 12:44:00 +0100, a ecrit:
> Sergey Bugaev, le dim. 24 nov. 2024 14:35:33 +0300, a ecrit:
> > Reduced further:
> >
> > --8<--
> > struct hurd_sigstate;
> >
> > typedef struct
> > {
>
> [... the content doesn't actually matter]
>
> > unsigned int reply_p
Sergey Bugaev, le dim. 24 nov. 2024 14:35:33 +0300, a ecrit:
> Reduced further:
>
> --8<--
> struct hurd_sigstate;
>
> typedef struct
> {
[... the content doesn't actually matter]
> unsigned int reply_port;
> } tcbhead_t;
>
> void
> __sigreturn2 (struct hurd_sigstate *ss, unsigned long *
Hello,
Samuel Thibault, le dim. 24 nov. 2024 15:18:31 +0100, a ecrit:
> Andreas Schwab, le dim. 24 nov. 2024 15:15:43 +0100, a ecrit:
> > On Nov 24 2024, Sergey Bugaev wrote:
> > > So are you saying that we always must mark any asm statement that
> > > might transfer control somewhere else w/o ret
