Attila Feher F (JO/LMF) wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html, but I cannot figure out if
the bug I have found in the way std::uncaught_exception works is a gcc or a
libstdc++ bug. Since the faulty behavior is the same with MinGW and Linux
native gcc, I guess it is a langu
Could someone help me understand what's causing the following
warning so that I can silence it? Gcc 3.4.3 emits it for an
implicitly inline one-line definition of the function (ctor,
actually, see below), so I'm not sure what the "function body
not available" bit is supposed to mean. The base ctor
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mar 25, 2005, at 7:59 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Could someone help me understand what's causing the following
warning so that I can silence it? Gcc 3.4.3 emits it for an
implicitly inline one-line definition of the function (ctor,
actually, see below), so I'm not
On 08/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
I'm emailing this manually to the list because Bugzilla is down and I
can't file a bug on Bugzilla about Bugzilla being down. The error
message looks like this:
Bugzilla and the rest of gcc.gnu.org have been down much of
the afternoon/evening due to
On 08/15/2017 07:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15 August 2017 at 04:10, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 08/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
I'm emailing this manually to the list because Bugzilla is down and I
can't file a bug on Bugzilla about Bugzilla being down. The error
mes
On 08/15/2017 10:27 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
It looks like the data loss extends beyond 8/14. Bug 81840
was created Sunday afternoon but is not in the database:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2017-08/msg01303.html
(Strangely, 81841 is there, as is
On 05/01/2017 01:39 PM, Simon Sobisch wrote:
Hi,
I've just got GCC7 (build from svn worked like a charm, even if it took hours
but I was warned) and like the new warnings and hints very much.
When compiling GnuCOBOL from vcs (sources on mount, therefore the long path) I
got one warning with m
would suggest to try a different terminal. Otherwise,
post your question to gcc-help where people who know more about
these things than me can help you.
Martin
Simon
Am 02.05.2017 um 01:29 schrieb Martin Sebor:
On 05/01/2017 01:39 PM, Simon Sobisch wrote:
Hi,
I've just got GCC7 (buil
sylvain dot joyeux at m4x dot org wrote:
The following testcase
#include
bool flag = true;
class guardian
{
public:
guardian() { flag = false; }
~guardian() { flag = true; }
bool get() { return flag; }
};
int main()
{
guardian guard();
std::cout << guard.get() << std::endl
Is there a recommended version of GNU binutils for 4.1? I have been
using 2.13 but the latest compiler doesn't seem to be happy with it.
I tried the latest, 2.16.1, but I get the same error with it as well.
I don't see anything about this in INSTALL/specific.html.
Here's the error I get (building
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mar 1, 2006, at 7:48 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Is there a recommended version of GNU binutils for 4.1? I have been
using 2.13 but the latest compiler doesn't seem to be happy with it.
I tried the latest, 2.16.1, but I get the same error with it as well.
I don&
Martin Sebor wrote:
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mar 1, 2006, at 7:48 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Is there a recommended version of GNU binutils for 4.1? I have been
using 2.13 but the latest compiler doesn't seem to be happy with it.
I tried the latest, 2.16.1, but I get the same error with
I was surprised to see macro definitions in the output of gcc
-E -g3 (see below). Is that behavior by design or is it a bug?
(I haven't seen anything about it in the manual, other than what
-g/leve/ mentions about debugger support for macro expansion).
Thanks
Martin
$ cat t.cpp && gcc -E t.cpp -g3
rolosworld at gmail dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From rolosworld at gmail dot com 2004-12-28 01:00
---
(In reply to comment #1)
You forgot C strings are null terminated.
I did this:
word = new char( strlen(str) + 1 );
Don't you mean new char [strlen(str) + 1]? I.e., brackets,
Tim Janik wrote:
hi all.
the code snippet below is extracted from a much more
complicated piece of code. basically the problem is that
g++ (3.3 and 3.4) demand different typedef syntax inside
template bodies, depending on whether full or partial
specialization is used.
is this really the correct be
Eric Noulard wrote:
I shall maintain
an HW/SW configuration
running Linux 2.2.14 / glibc 2.1.2 / LinuxThread 0.8
I have a C++ application compiled using gcc 2.95.2
which has several thread that may throw exception.
I experience weird and not 100% repeatable mis-behaviour of
the application whic
On 3/21/21 9:01 AM, Benjamin-Elias Probst wrote:
Hello,
my computer tried to build gcc in gcc-10.2.0
This happend after ./configure ... sudo make on ubuntu mint 20.1:
If you are reporting a bug then please enter it in GCC Bugzilla
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/). This list simply collects
B
17 matches
Mail list logo
