https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61771
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[4.8 regression] internal
|simplify_const_unary_operat |compiler error: in
|ion, at simplify-rtx.c:1508 |simplify_const_unary_operat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-07-25
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.8.3, 4.9.0, 4.9.1
Version|4.9.0 |4.10.0
Summary|[ARM] [4.9 regression] ICE |[ARM] [4.10 regression] ICE
|with DImode shift
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61948
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62014
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-*
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62014
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #6)
> One crude way to look is by looking for the "w" constraint that signifies
> usage of FP registers in the md files and seeing whether those usages are
> properly
Target||aarch64-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-08-05
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ramana at gcc dot
gnu.org
Summary|[AArch64] Default use of|[AArch64
|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2014-08-11
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ramana at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61373
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.1
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
>From code generated currently - looks fixed for 4.9.1 since GCC 4.9.0 was
actually relea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62098
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNC
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ramana at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62098
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 33300
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33300&action=edit
Patch under testing.
Embarassing patch to fix the issue. Currently being tested .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62098
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Aug 12 14:32:07 2014
New Revision: 213861
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213861&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/62098
2014-08-12 Ramana Radhakrishnan
PR ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61413
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Aug 12 14:59:23 2014
New Revision: 213864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/61413
2014-08-12 Ramana Radhakrishnan
PR t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||4.8.3, 4.9.0, 4.9.1
Keywords||wrong-code
Last reconfirmed||2014-08-19
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62098
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Aug 20 11:31:21 2014
New Revision: 214217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214217&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport fix for PR target/62098
2014-08-20 Ramana Radhakrishnan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62098
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2015-11-27
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Cannot reproduce on trunk any more.
Not sure where it got fixed though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #16 from Ramana R
|ramana at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
I can no longer reproduce this on the head of the GCC 5 tree.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64783
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68256
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |7.0
Summary|[6 regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304
--- Comment #44 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #39)
> We have backported r227748, 229160 and 229161 to our linaro-gcc-5 branch,
> and we got a bug report from the kernel team.
Sorry about the breakage.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295
--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> At the RTL level, it would be nice if REE optimized away at least the
> redundant zero extension, thus change:
> cmp r1, #0
> rev16ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
--- Comment #24 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
*** Bug 67295 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Bug 64164 depends on bug 67295, which changed state.
Bug 67295 Summary: [ARM][6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/builtin-bswap-1.c
scan-assembler-times revshne\\t 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304
--- Comment #49 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to ard.biesheuvel from comment #48)
> (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #47)
> > (In reply to ard.biesheuvel from comment #46)
> > > One issue that this causes, which I did not see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66200
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jun 4 09:19:51 2015
New Revision: 224118
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224118&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove TARGET_RELAXED_ORDERING and optimize for weak memory models
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66192
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jun 4 09:19:51 2015
New Revision: 224118
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224118&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove TARGET_RELAXED_ORDERING and optimize for weak memory models
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66200
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
||2015-06-08
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
confirmed.
||2015-06-10
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ramana at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66200
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Jun 10 07:43:31 2015
New Revision: 224313
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224313&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle aarch64_guard1.C test
Sorry about missing this hunk in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66192
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Jun 10 07:43:31 2015
New Revision: 224313
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224313&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle aarch64_guard1.C test
Sorry about missing this hunk in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66428
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Jun 10 07:43:31 2015
New Revision: 224313
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224313&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle aarch64_guard1.C test
Sorry about missing this hunk in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66192
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66428
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66136
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66242
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
,
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Eric,
Would you be able to comment further ?
Ramana
||2015-06-11
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #61 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Well, confirmed at least. And at the minute fixed on trunk - not sure if we are
asking for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66192
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jun 12 09:49:41 2015
New Revision: 224411
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224411&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use atomics in guard.cc.
This provides proper definitions for _GL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66200
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jun 12 09:49:41 2015
New Revision: 224411
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224411&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use atomics in guard.cc.
This provides proper definitions for _GL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66200
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Jun 16 15:26:41 2015
New Revision: 224524
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224524&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/66200 on the 4.9 branch
Define TARGET_RELAXED_ORDER
||2015-06-17
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63521
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63408
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Itay Perl from comment #7)
> Any news? This bug still prevents us from compiling our code with
> optimizations.
>
> Thanks.
Sorry to have dropped the ball on this one - does replacing th
||2015-06-23
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65375
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63408
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Itay Perl from comment #10)
> A few examples:
>
> a=100, b=0x7fff -O0: 0.0 -O3: 200.0
> a=0, b=0x7fff/100.0f -O0: -1.0 -O3: 1.0
> a=0, b=-0x7fff/100.0f -O0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63408
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 35833
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35833&action=edit
current patch.
Patch I'm testing - this is based on a 4.9 tree where I could easily replicate
the probl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63408
--- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Jun 24 08:28:08 2015
New Revision: 224879
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224879&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/63408
The attached patch fixes PR target/63408 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65375
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #10)
> Improved, but not completely resolved. We still get unnecessary orr
> instructions, same as in comment 2. This is partly an issue with the
> register allo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66200
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Jun 24 09:59:28 2015
New Revision: 224890
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224890&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/66200
This applies the same fix for PR target/66200
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58133
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58133
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Oh and Kyrylo fixed up vfp.md last year too. So it's only ARM state that
remains. I have a few patches in flight that I'm testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64172
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Component|target
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ramana at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Need to apply Aurelien's patch - looks like that's slipped through the cracks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49799
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.gilbert at linaro dot org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48803
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45447
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed in 4.5.0
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #34 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
I guess waiting till someone tests on iwmmxt2 or proposes an actual tested
patch for this on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49437
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39585
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48808
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65771
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed in 4.9.0 then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29693
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jun 25 08:18:19 2015
New Revision: 224932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224932&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/29693
2015-06-25 Ramana Radhakrishnan
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Hmmm atleast fixed for 6.0 ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63408
--- Comment #14 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jun 25 08:36:03 2015
New Revision: 224933
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224933&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/63408
Backport fix for PR target/63408 from mainli
*-*-*
|3.18.0-linux4sam_5.0-alpha1 |
|#1 Wed Jun 24 09:45:58 CEST |
|2015 armv7l GNU/Linux |
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Host|Linux |x86_64-*-*
|MatrixPlatVb-lx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65375
--- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Or indeed PR 63277...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63277
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||47562
--- Comment #6 from Ramana
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This example
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int8x8_t a = {argc, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7};
int8x8_t b = {0, 1, 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66675
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66675
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
The GCC vector speak variant is as below.
typedef char v8qi __attribute__ ((vector_size (8)));
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
v8qi a = {argc, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7};
v8qi b = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47562
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-linux-gnueabi, arm-eabi |arm-linux-gnueabi,
Target||aarch64*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2015-06-25
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65912
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||47562
--- Comment #3 from Ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65711
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2015-06-26
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63408
--- Comment #16 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Jul 1 08:01:57 2015
New Revision: 225226
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225226&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/63408 on the 4.9 branch.
2015-07-01 Ramana Radhak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63408
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66745
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66745
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
I've had a look at it - however it's not an area that I've worked in before, so
beware it will take me a while to understand the issue here.
If someone can help with a reduced testcase that would be a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66136
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
--- Comment #16 from Ramana R
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed for 5.2 ?
||2015-07-22
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed.
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ramana at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #18 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
I'm taking a look into this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304
--- Comment #19 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #18)
> I'm taking a look into this.
RFC here - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02258.html
||2015-07-29
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org,
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Version|5.2.0 |4.7.3
Ever confirmed|0 |1
901 - 1000 of 1230 matches
Mail list logo
