[Bug tree-optimization/79826] New: Unnecessary spills in vectorised loop version

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org CC: amker at gcc dot gnu.org, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 40877 --> https://gcc.gnu.

[Bug tree-optimization/79826] Unnecessary spills in vectorised loop version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79826 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #40877|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug c/79855] params.def: missing period in PARAM_MAX_STORES_TO_MERGE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79855 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/79911] VEC_SELECT bugs in arm neon patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79911 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/79913] VEC_SELECT bugs in aarch64 patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79913 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c/79855] params.def: missing period in PARAM_MAX_STORES_TO_MERGE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79855 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Mar 7 09:36:44 2017 New Revision: 245948 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245948&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/79855: add full stop to store mergi

[Bug c/79855] params.def: missing period in PARAM_MAX_STORES_TO_MERGE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79855 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/79971] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1554 on ARM target with saturated integers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79971 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/79913] VEC_SELECT bugs in aarch64 patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79913 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Mar 9 10:34:36 2017 New Revision: 245999 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245999&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/79913: VEC_SELECT bugs in

[Bug target/79913] VEC_SELECT bugs in aarch64 patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79913 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/79911] VEC_SELECT bugs in arm neon patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79911 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Mon Mar 13 10:58:48 2017 New Revision: 246084 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246084&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/79911: Invalid vec_select a

[Bug target/79911] VEC_SELECT bugs in arm neon patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79911 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/80028] New: Failure to build allyesconfig arm64 kernel using aarch64-none-linux-gnu

Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/80079] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s): gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:768

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80079 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/80079] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s): gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:768

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80079 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4) > Or perhaps just init it in the constructor: > > diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c b/gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.

[Bug target/80082] [5/6/7 regression] GCC incorrectly assumes Cortex-r[578] have 64-bit single-copy atomic LDRD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/80082] [5/6/7 regression] GCC incorrectly assumes Cortex-r[578] have 64-bit single-copy atomic LDRD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 Assignee

[Bug target/80082] [5/6/7 regression] GCC incorrectly assumes Cortex-r[578] have 64-bit single-copy atomic LDRD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org|prakhar.bahuguna at

[Bug rtl-optimization/80112] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in doloop_condition_get at loop-doloop.c:158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80112 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug middle-end/80131] powerpc: 1U << (31 - x) doesn't generate optimised code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80131 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/79480] -O3 and -mfpu=neon produces crashing code on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79480 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/79418] ERROR: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-2.c -O0 : syntax error in targe t selector "target arm_hf_eabi || avr-*-* || riscv*-*-*" for "

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79418 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/79871] i18n: document placeholders for translators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79871 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/77772] Segmentation fault when running an application with gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/71436] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault in arm_output_multireg_pop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71436 --- Comment #15 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Mar 23 14:55:48 2017 New Revision: 246419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246419&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/71436: Restrict *load_multiple

[Bug target/71436] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault in arm_output_multireg_pop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71436 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/80389] New: [7 Regression][ARM] -march=armv8-a and -mcpu=cortex-a57 results in invalid .cpu assembly directive

Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: assemble-failure Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org CC: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone

[Bug target/80389] [7 Regression][ARM] -march=armv8-a and -mcpu=cortex-a57 results in invalid .cpu assembly directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80389 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Known to work

[Bug target/80236] ARM NEON: Crash in std::map

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/82778] crash: insn does not satisfy its constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82778 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||collison at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/83009] [8 regression] gcc.target/aarch64/store_v2vec_lanes.c fails with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83009 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/83067] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83067 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/83114] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gen_vec_cmpv2dfv2di, at config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md:2495

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83114 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug target/83114] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gen_vec_cmpv2dfv2di, at config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md:2495

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83114 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Doesn't need the -g either. Just -O3 is enough

[Bug rtl-optimization/83124] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc with -O3 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83124 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/83195] [8 regression] pr82929.c scan for "Merging successful" fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83195 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug driver/83207] On ARM -mcpu=native does not detect ARM big/little cpu combinations correctly (armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83207 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug target/83208] [arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc] wrong code at optimization level -O2 and -O3 for union assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83208 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- The testcase is "fixed" by using -fno-strict-aliasing. In this example pointers c and d alias each other, they are of incompatible types and they are both dereferenced, so the te

[Bug middle-end/83303] New: [8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/opt/new1.C on arm-none-eabi (extra -Walloc-size-larger-than warning)

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I'm seeing the above test fail on arm-none-eabi configured with --disable-shared --disabl

[Bug middle-end/83303] [8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/opt/new1.C on arm-none-eabi (extra -Walloc-size-larger-than warning)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83303 --- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- I note that this doesn't appear on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf

[Bug middle-end/83303] [8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/opt/new1.C on arm-none-eabi (extra -Walloc-size-larger-than warning)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83303 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug rtl-optimization/81020] [6/7 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-coalesce-vars -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81020 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

[Bug rtl-optimization/81020] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-coalesce-vars -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81020 --- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > There's nothing wrong with the GIMPLE (looked at aarch64) so it must be some > other RTL optimization issue. > > aarch64 asse

[Bug rtl-optimization/81020] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-coalesce-vars -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81020 --- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #11) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > > There's nothing wrong with the GIMPLE (looked at aarch64) so it must be some

[Bug rtl-optimization/83304] New: [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr61725.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions

Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org CC: segher

[Bug rtl-optimization/83304] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr61725.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83304 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.2.0 Target Milestone

[Bug rtl-optimization/83304] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr61725.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83304 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- hmm, I'm getting some weird behaviour. I see the test failing in a testsuite run. When I try to build and run the test outside the testsuite harness it doesn't abort. However, the

[Bug rtl-optimization/83304] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr61725.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83304 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4) > With r255384 combine manages to do many more combinations. Without it, it > can get rid of most of the loop body (which should hav

[Bug rtl-optimization/83304] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr61725.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83304 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- So I'm digging through the combine dumps... Before the r255384 we have: Trying 70 -> 19: 70: r131:SI={(cc:CC!=0)?r130:SI:0x} REG_DEAD r130:SI 19: {r134:SI

[Bug rtl-optimization/83304] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr61725.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83304 --- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 42808 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42808&action=edit Assembly for aborting testcase Attaching the assembly for -O2 -funroll-loops -mthumb

[Bug tree-optimization/83323] [8 Regression] 186.crafty miscompares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83323 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-*-* |x86_64

[Bug middle-end/77426] Duplicate condition in expmed.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77426 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/77456] Suboptimal code when returning a string generated with a constexpr fn at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77456 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/70473] genautomata memory footprint for arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70473 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to

[Bug middle-end/77426] Duplicate condition in expmed.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77426 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Mon Sep 12 08:17:27 2016 New Revision: 240089 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240089&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [expmed.c] PR middle-end/77426 Delete duplicate c

[Bug other/77421] Bugs found in GCC with the help of PVS-Studio

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77421 Bug 77421 depends on bug 77426, which changed state. Bug 77426 Summary: Duplicate condition in expmed.c https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77426 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/77426] Duplicate condition in expmed.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77426 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/77578] [5 Regression] Compiler crashes with segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77578 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work

[Bug c++/77662] arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cgcc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77662 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug target/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- A slightly adjusted testcase is: #include #include struct C { void doCb () { size_t dummy_a = 1; std::cout << ""; auto tmp = this; std::function

[Bug target/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- The differences between r234749 and the one before it start in 032t.esra: --- good/wrong.cpp.032t.esra2016-09-22 17:41:24.914598329 +0100 +++ bad/wrong.cpp.032t.esra 2016-09-22 17:40

[Bug target/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > This can only uncover another pre-existing issue as it is a 100% obvious > fix. I do not have a good way to run anything on arm so please h

[Bug target/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|kyrylo.tkachov at arm dot com | --- Comment #7

[Bug target/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 39688 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39688&action=edit Preprocessed source Attaching the preprocessed source. The function in question is: _ZN1C

[Bug target/77728] [5/6/7 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug target/77728] [5/6/7 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r225465. Something to do with alignment. I wonder if it's related to PR69841 ?

[Bug debug/77773] [6/7 regression] Segfault when compiling __simd64_float16_t using arm-none-eabi-g++ with debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug bootstrap/77774] Build failure on netbsd-7.0.1/arm6hf of gcc 6.2.0, 7-20160925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/77774] Build failure on netbsd-7.0.1/arm6hf of gcc 6.2.0, 7-20160925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #2) > The configure target used here is armv6--netbsdelf-eabihf (note two dashes > after armv6) > > aarch64-common.o is added to extra_objs in co

[Bug middle-end/77816] [7 Regression] lots of fortran tests fail on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77816 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/77816] [7 Regression] lots of fortran tests fail on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77816 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/77822] [6 REGRESSION] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed

[Bug middle-end/77816] [7 Regression] lots of fortran tests fail on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77816 --- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #6) > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #4) > > I can't reproduce the fortran failures with a clean trunk at r240705 > > conf

[Bug c++/77822] [6 REGRESSION] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 --- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- :1:39: warning: emu.h.gch: created by a different GCC executable :1:9: fatal error: emu.h.gch: PCH file was invalid Is there any way you can get a pre-processed source without any precompiled

[Bug target/77822] [6/7 Regression] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||assemble-failure

[Bug target/77822] [6/7 Regression] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/77822] [6/7 Regression] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/77916] New: [6/7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_in_cfg: invalid (pointer) operands to plus/minus

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following testcase ICEs for me on aarch64 with -O3 on GCC 6 and trunk (GCC 7) typedef struct

[Bug tree-optimization/77916] [6/7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_in_cfg: invalid (pointer) operands to plus/minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77916 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.3 Known to fail

[Bug bootstrap/77917] ARM/AARCH64 bootstrap-lto fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77917 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/78004] g++ 6.2.1 segfaults when compiling qt 4.8.7 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/78020] [AArch64] vuzp{1,2}q_f64 implementation identical to vzip{1,2}q_f64 in arm_neon.h and probably incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78020 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords

[Bug target/78020] [AArch64] vuzp{1,2}q_f64 implementation identical to vzip{1,2}q_f64 in arm_neon.h and probably incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78020 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/78029] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2285

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78029 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/78038] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_sub_rtx, at ree.c:655

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78038 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords

[Bug target/78038] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_sub_rtx, at ree.c:655

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78038 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, so the zero_extend candidate is: (insn 9 10 11 2 (set (reg/f:DI 1 x1 [orig:74 g.1_2 ] [74]) (zero_extend:DI (reg/v:SI 28 x28 [ g ]))) "ree.c":16 84 {*zero_extendsid

[Bug target/78038] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_sub_rtx, at ree.c:655

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78038 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #2) > Hmm, so the zero_extend candidate is: > (insn 9 10 11 2 (set (reg/f:DI 1 x1 [orig:74 g.1_2 ] [74]) > (zero_extend:DI (reg/v:SI 2

[Bug rtl-optimization/78038] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_sub_rtx, at ree.c:655

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78038 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/78038] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_sub_rtx, at ree.c:655

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78038 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steffen Schmidt from comment #0) > Created attachment 39840 [details] > Test source file > > Dear GCC maintainers, > > we found that gcc / g++ crashes with inter

[Bug rtl-optimization/78038] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_sub_rtx, at ree.c:655

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78038 --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Oct 21 07:55:30 2016 New Revision: 241395 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241395&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ree] PR rtl-optimization/78038: Handle global

[Bug rtl-optimization/78038] [5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_sub_rtx, at ree.c:655

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78038 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[5

[Bug rtl-optimization/78041] Wrong code on ARMv7 with -mthumb -mfpu=neon-fp16 -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78041 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug rtl-optimization/78041] Wrong code on ARMv7 with -mthumb -mfpu=neon-fp16 -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78041 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #13

[Bug rtl-optimization/78127] New: [5/6/7 Regression] AArch64 internal compiler error: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1440

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The fortran OpenMP testcase gfortran.dg/gomp/pr39354.f90 ICEs when run with an explicit -O2

[Bug middle-end/22141] [5/6/7 Regression] Missing optimization when storing structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22141 --- Comment #37 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Oct 28 14:18:50 2016 New Revision: 241649 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241649&root=gcc&view=rev Log: GIMPLE store merging pass 2016-10-28 Kyrylo

[Bug rtl-optimization/23684] Combine stores for non strict alignment targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23684 --- Comment #15 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Oct 28 14:18:50 2016 New Revision: 241649 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241649&root=gcc&view=rev Log: GIMPLE store merging pass 2016-10-28 Kyrylo

[Bug tree-optimization/78162] ICE on invalid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78162 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/78170] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78170 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >