https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70291
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64
The testcase:
unsigned long long combine(unsigned long long a, unsigned long long b) {
return (a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85616
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Though the example code given breaks C's strict aliasing rules, doesn't it?
bug_start is an array of chars (byte-aligned) but the stores to it are done as
ints, which expect word ali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #60 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri May 4 16:35:32 2018
New Revision: 259940
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259940&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/82518: Return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512
--- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri May 4 16:37:30 2018
New Revision: 259941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259941&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR target/85512: Tighten SIMD rig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81478
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85711
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri May 11 09:35:31 2018
New Revision: 260159
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260159&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/83687: Fix invalid combination
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85769
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85794
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22141
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izaberina at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69616
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86014
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86029
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81497
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81497
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Jun 5 09:50:16 2018
New Revision: 261191
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261191&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/81497: Fix arm_acle.h for C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81497
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81497
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Jun 8 08:18:43 2018
New Revision: 261305
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261305&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/81497: Fix arm_acle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86139
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86139
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
GCC currently does a suboptimal job of returning structs.
Consider the testcases:
typedef struct { double x, y; } D2;
typedef struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86164
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 86165 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86165
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86164
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 86163 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86163
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86166
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86209
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86209
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The other thing to consider with merging loads is how the result is used.
In your example if you merge the 16-bit loads into a single 32-bit register
load you'll have to add instructio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86264
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Consider a non-void function that's missing a return statement:
int test()
{
volatile int i = 0;
}
g++ at -O
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm-none-eabi
The testcase:
int index (int, int);
void foo(const short *input)
{
short a0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90317
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Jul 18 15:42:13 2019
New Revision: 273574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[patch1/2][arm][PR90317]: fix sha1 patterns
Th
ernal-improvement
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I'm trying to add a define_subst use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91255
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91255
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Aug 16 09:32:36 2019
New Revision: 274564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274564&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gensupport] PR 91255: Do not error out immedi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91255
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91684
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91912
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91913
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69471
--- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Sep 26 10:52:42 2019
New Revision: 276148
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276148&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
driver: Also prune joined switches with negati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-07-22 00:00:00 |2019-10-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69471
--- Comment #14 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Oct 1 10:28:40 2019
New Revision: 276397
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276397&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
driver: Also prune joined switches with negati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91949
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222
--- Comment #24 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks. Unfortunately I still see the ICE building 507.cactuBSSN_r on aarch64
with -flto in the same place:
995 gcc_assert (TYPE_NAME (t1)
996 && TREE_CODE (T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222
--- Comment #26 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #25)
> > --- Comment #24 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> > Thanks. Unfortunately I still see the ICE building 507.cactuBSSN_r on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Bisection shows that on the trunk before r264897 we emit:
> casalx30, x1, [x0]
> starting with r264897 we ICE and finally star
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91982
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm*
On aarch64 we can do SImode and DImode popcount operations using the AdvSIMD
CNT instruction. As the comment in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396
--- Comment #67 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for working on this!
As of r255632 I'm still getting:
Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment
on arm targets when building gdb. A reduced testca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396
--- Comment #74 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #70)
> ktkatchov, I'll submit the patch as soon as it completes testing, which
> should be Real Soon Now (TM) :-) If you got the cycles t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396
--- Comment #79 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #78)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #74)
> > (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #70)
> > > ktkatchov, I'll submit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396
--- Comment #81 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #80)
> A preprocessed testcase and command line would be welcome to try to debug
> the armv8 issue.
Sorry for the confusion. The armv8 boo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Last reconfirmed|2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83492
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64_be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Dec 19 16:58:22 2017
New Revision: 255830
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255830&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/82975: Guard against reg_renumb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE in |[6/7 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83495
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83499
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Dec 20 09:29:13 2017
New Revision: 255853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/82975: Guard against reg_renumb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83492
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Dec 20 15:07:01 2017
New Revision: 255896
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255896&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH, PR83492] Fix selection of aarch64 bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83492
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Jan 5 13:58:54 2018
New Revision: 256278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256278&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH, PR83492] Fix selection of aarch64 bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83492
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83712
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Mon Jan 8 18:42:50 2018
New Revision: 256350
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256350&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/82975: Guard against reg_renumb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on GCC 7 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83750
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 83751 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83751
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Jan 9 11:38:04 2018
New Revision: 256377
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256377&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/82975: Guard against reg_renumb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83768
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in int_mode_for_mode, |[6/7 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Mon Jan 15 11:56:03 2018
New Revision: 256696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256696&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/83687: Fix invalid combination
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
Summary|[6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49678
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58424
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49678
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Jan 17 11:51:03 2018
New Revision: 256791
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256791&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/83687: Fix invalid combination
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65578
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> Tightening the arm_arch_v6_ok test like this would fix the failure:
> ...
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> b/gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42575
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janis at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49678
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42575
--- Comment #17 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As mentioned in PR, sched1 exposes this problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65578
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Jan 18 09:30:58 2018
New Revision: 256840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256840&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/65578: Fix builtin-bswap16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65578
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc*-*-*, i?86-*-*, |powerpc*-*-*, i?86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83983
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> So any hint on whether the code after r257077 is better or worse than before?
Looks worse unfortunately:
For aarch64 at -O2 it generates:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > So any hint on whether the code after r257077 is better or worse than
> > before?
&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067
> >
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7)
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067
> >
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84129
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||assemble-failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #23 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Jan 31 10:06:45 2018
New Revision: 257225
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257225&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR tree-optimization/64946: XFAIL
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84164
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
201 - 300 of 2215 matches
Mail list logo
