https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121202
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d0c17354e42d57d3f94a7b66ab59299b076ee68
commit r15-10061-g4d0c17354e42d57d3f94a7b66ab59299b076ee68
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121202
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106610
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104874
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkaminsk at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118440
--- Comment #6 from Disservin ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Note this is NOT wrong code to store a zero there since you are storing from
> an uninitialized value.
yes, maybe it was poorly described in my initial report.. thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121230
Bug ID: 121230
Summary: x86: Inefficient code generation with -m3dnow -msse
since GCC 12
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115800
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #7)
> It is generally assumed that powerpc64le-*-* implies POWER7+ (glibc even
> requires POWER8+). This is independent of the older -mlittle support (which
> d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121236
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> Created attachment 61962 [details]
> Patch which needs a commit message and testcases
And some comment changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121236
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61962
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61962&action=edit
Patch which needs a commit message and testcases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121236
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
+ /* Remove the phi and move to the next phi arg if needed. */
+ if (phi == gsi_stmt (*pgsi))
+remove_phi_node (pgsi, false);
Needs to be fixed too.
It should be something like:
/* Move to the next
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119293
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121093
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
t.c.047t.cddce1:Marking useful stmt: # DEBUG INLINE_ENTRY p2
t.c.047t.cddce1:Marking useful stmt: # DEBUG INLINE_ENTRY p1
t.c.047t.cddce1: # DEBUG INLINE_ENTRY p1D.2958
we eliminate the inline scope becau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120961
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108080
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shyeyian at petalmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 120961, which changed state.
Bug 120961 Summary: ICE on C++20 module when compiling Eigen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120961
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121236
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61961
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61961&action=edit
cleaned up reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121236
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117294
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1872cc05b0dc53bb440b7b3ee045bb49e474ccb
commit r16-2492-gf1872cc05b0dc53bb440b7b3ee045bb49e474ccb
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113854
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1872cc05b0dc53bb440b7b3ee045bb49e474ccb
commit r16-2492-gf1872cc05b0dc53bb440b7b3ee045bb49e474ccb
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113854
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121238
Bug ID: 121238
Summary: `-fmodules` causes invalid runtime exceptions with
`std::format`
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121239
Bug ID: 121239
Summary: mangling of non-dependent calls and operators that
resolve to an overload
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121239
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-07-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119382
--- Comment #10 from Jeevitha ---
Right now, I have fixed this in trunk and plan to backport it to GCC 15.
It seems that patch dc47161c1f32c3 has been backported to the GCC 14 and 13
branches.
Can I backport the corresponding testcase fix also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119962
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a29c9147404c0473e009df879e7467ff4948820
commit r15-10062-g5a29c9147404c0473e009df879e7467ff4948820
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121055
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119962
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121233
Bug ID: 121233
Summary: double equal comparison 32bit g++
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121230
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121233
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104874
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104874
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc49c0a46ec96e754e36ccfdfd6e7613efd03f3f
commit r16-2484-gdc49c0a46ec96e754e36ccfdfd6e7613efd03f3f
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121234
Bug ID: 121234
Summary: Bogus diagnostic on READ of string with semicolon.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121231
Bug ID: 121231
Summary: [13->trunk] miscompile with brace-initialized constant
template parameter perhaps due to function coalescing
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121231
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #43 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Manfred Schwarb from comment #41)
> Jerry, are you really sure about this?
>
> character(80) buffer,a
> buffer="33;44"
> read(buffer,*,decimal="point") a
> print*,a
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121234
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106610
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121198
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 61955
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61955&action=edit
hrc-bswapsi.diff: Proposed patch to get rig of hard regs in avr.md
This patch also runs into ICE. It tries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121232
Bug ID: 121232
Summary: Improve implementation of make_shared for arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121185
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121232
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120714
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|16.0|15.1.1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120805
--- Comment #16 from Avinash Jayakar ---
Created attachment 61956
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61956&action=edit
I have just changed the order within the conditional where the const_vf gets
assigned, to have it behave in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120936
Bug 120936 depends on bug 120923, which changed state.
Bug 120923 Summary: check-function-bodies doesn't support "1: call mcount"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120923
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120881
--- Comment #32 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 120923 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120923
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114445
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OpenMP] indirect - |[OpenMP] indirect - race
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119231
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44e32178031e89399710c3ee7444891631a9c8ec
commit r16-2489-g44e32178031e89399710c3ee7444891631a9c8ec
Author: Robert Dubner
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120805
--- Comment #17 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Avinash Jayakar from comment #16)
> Created attachment 61956 [details]
> I have just changed the order within the conditional where the const_vf gets
> assigned, to have it behave in similar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121231
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||94511
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121185
--- Comment #31 from Mikael Morin ---
The problem is, in norm we use a polymorphic assignment to assign y%x, using
the virtual table of y. It is a problem I have seen before on other testcases
when preparing the patch, gfc_get_class_from_expr i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121093
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 61957
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61957&action=edit
patch to autofdo for multiple source locations per single instruction
This is patch which makes the autofdo tool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121231
--- Comment #3 from Gašper Ažman ---
Would that make it a /way/ reduced test case in that case?
PR 94511 seems to be value-dependent. In this case, both clang and msvc accept
and generate correct code. PR 94511 seems like you needed to tweak it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120776
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61912|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118440
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED
Assignee|pinskia at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121208
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61953|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119231
Robert Dubner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121235
Bug ID: 121235
Summary: Local register variable constraints aren't respected
in extended asm
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119367
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 Regression][gcn] |[15 Regression][gcn]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121230
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Try -fexcess-precision=fast or -std=gnu11?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121230
--- Comment #2 from Jörn Heusipp ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Try -fexcess-precision=fast or -std=gnu11?
Both have no effect.
I had already also already tried -ffast-math, also no effect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121137
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121217
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121230
--- Comment #3 from Jörn Heusipp ---
(In reply to Jörn Heusipp from comment #2)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > Try -fexcess-precision=fast or -std=gnu11?
>
> Both have no effect.
Well, both shift stack locations around, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121055
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80a51dae8b9af3f6b318f8ed71c67aab96a3fc91
commit r15-10063-g80a51dae8b9af3f6b318f8ed71c67aab96a3fc91
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121235
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
In fact my fixed up code is how it is written in the documentation even.
int t1 = …;
register int *p1 asm ("r0") = …;
register int *p2 asm ("r1") = t1;
register int *result asm ("r0");
asm ("sysint" : "=r"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114445
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
I actually wonder whether we couldn't fill it on the host.
It kind of assumes sizeof(void*) is the same on the host and
on the device, but then it should work, given that htab only
allocates memory in htab_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121235
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114632
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb59e58dcc4cdf36b8b2d4e1654fe4fa062b5bef
commit r16-2490-geb59e58dcc4cdf36b8b2d4e1654fe4fa062b5bef
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101233
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb59e58dcc4cdf36b8b2d4e1654fe4fa062b5bef
commit r16-2490-geb59e58dcc4cdf36b8b2d4e1654fe4fa062b5bef
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121231
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121231
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
It works if we explicitly zero-initialize 'result':
Foo result{0,0};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121236
Bug ID: 121236
Summary: Problems during GIMPLE pass: ifcvt
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97791
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93738
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> However, this pattern is failing to match in some cases,
> and we end up with two separate instructions: one for rotate and another for
> insert.
So this is *not* a combine problem at all you say? J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121236
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121237
--- Comment #2 from Rohan Lean ---
(The libstdc++ implementation corresponding to that overload also appears to
have the problem, however.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121230
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.5
Summary|x86: Inefficient co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121217
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Summary|internal compiler e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121236
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92750
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92750
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92750
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Maybe not 100% the same but I think it shows the issue:
```
struct s1
{
int t;
s1(int tt) : t(tt) {}
};
struct s2 : s1
{
s2(int a) : s1(a){}
};
void g(s2*);
void f()
{
s2 a[2]{s2(0), s2(1)};
g(a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115800
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121236
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #3 from D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121237
Bug ID: 121237
Summary: Wrong return value of
`condition_variable_any::wait_until`
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121236
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C code seems to be:
short g_59, func_7___trans_tmp_8;
long g_159;
int func_26_l_176;
void func_26(short *p_27) {
unsigned char l_184;
for (; g_59; g_59 += 1)
if (func_26_l_176)
l_18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121237
--- Comment #1 from Rohan Lean ---
I copy pasted the wrong listing from the standard by mistake. The correct one
is:
```
while (!stoken.stop_requested()) {
if (pred())
return true;
if (wait_until(lock, abs_time) == cv_status::timeo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117294
--- Comment #6 from Nathaniel Shead ---
With the above patch, the original testcase now gives the following diagnostic
(using experimental-nesting=yes for clarity):
$ g++-16 -std=c++20 -S -fdiagnostics-set-output=text:experimental-nesting=yes
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121175
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98735
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||omerfaruko at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 121175, which changed state.
Bug 121175 Summary: [modules] ICE with explicit specialization of template
class (internal compiler error: in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9975)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120962
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 120962, which changed state.
Bug 120962 Summary: " XXX references internal linkage entity YYY" when
compiling a module interface
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120962
What|Removed
95 matches
Mail list logo
