https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
No problem -- you may want to do -Werror=return-type -Werror=uninitialized
-Werror=sequence-point as well to reduce the chance of reducing to something
bogus. (-Werror=return-type would catch that issue I menti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119829
Bug ID: 119829
Summary: Internal Compiler Error with braced initialization and
designated initializers
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119801
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07565115371ea5cdf9e6d75ea3777540d1d31bda
commit r15-9481-g07565115371ea5cdf9e6d75ea3777540d1d31bda
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119801
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119808
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The bug is in
bitint.4 ={v} {CLOBBER(eos)};
That shouldn't have been emitted after bitint.4 to bitint.4 copy for the
b.0_6 = b_5;
copy.
I guess for -O1 we should just omit any code for the copy when bot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119817
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-15
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119815
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
looks like another trigger for the latent SCEV issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119817
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5ed7d19c965de9ccb158d77e929b17459bf65b5
commit r15-9483-gf5ed7d19c965de9ccb158d77e929b17459bf65b5
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Tue A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112288
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:369461d0749790f1291f76096064d583d2547934
commit r15-9484-g369461d0749790f1291f76096064d583d2547934
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119807
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:369461d0749790f1291f76096064d583d2547934
commit r15-9484-g369461d0749790f1291f76096064d583d2547934
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119807
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Summary|[14/15 Regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119808
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The clobber is emitted when processing
b.1_1 = (unsigned _BitInt(129)) b.0_6;
and the rules covering it are
if (m_first
&& m_single_use_names
&& m_vars[p] != m_lhs
&& m_af
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119754
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119628
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Ken Jin from comment #9)
> I tried this out with CPython's interpreter that uses tail calls with the
> patch at
> https://gitlab.com/x86-gcc/gcc/-/tree/users/hjl/saved/master?ref_type=heads
> applied
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119803
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
I have posted a patch with the change proposed by Jakub to the mailing list:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ri67c3lbm7q@virgil.suse.cz/T/#u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119814
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119754
--- Comment #3 from Tomasz Kamiński ---
Except that `::operator new` does not perform implicit object creation at
compile time per https://eel.is/c++draft/intro.object#14:
> Except during constant evaluation, any implicit or explicit invocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119799
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:074b2b0f91f948fe3488ada91ec6a8576c684dea
commit r15-9485-g074b2b0f91f948fe3488ada91ec6a8576c684dea
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Tue A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119803
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So full patch would be
--- gcc/ipa-cp.cc.jj2025-04-15 14:56:26.861419422 +0200
+++ gcc/ipa-cp.cc 2025-04-15 15:10:05.270414498 +0200
@@ -933,13 +933,13 @@ ipcp_bits_lattice::meet_with_1 (widest_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119818
Bug ID: 119818
Summary: FAIL: cobol.dg/group2/FUNCTION_DATE___TIME_OMNIBUS.cob
-O0 execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119803
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4cf69503bcb32491dbd7ab63fe7f0f9fcdcca38
commit r15-9486-gb4cf69503bcb32491dbd7ab63fe7f0f9fcdcca38
Author: Martin Jambor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #33 from Martin Jambor ---
The patch from comment #32 passes LTO-bootstrap and profiled-LTO-bootstrap on
x86_64-linux. I have asked Honza to look at it and comment, especially on the
decision to put the return VR into clone_info des
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99214
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3dc43f7f4394f8705090232e3506e1e94f484877
commit r14-11616-g3dc43f7f4394f8705090232e3506e1e94f484877
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119803
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20250415/configure
--prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging
--enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119318
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4cf69503bcb32491dbd7ab63fe7f0f9fcdcca38
commit r15-9486-gb4cf69503bcb32491dbd7ab63fe7f0f9fcdcca38
Author: Martin Jambor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119809
Robert Dubner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119809
Robert Dubner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81087
Nicolas Boulenguez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58152|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118809
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113835
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daklishch at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119547
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:517f7e3f02b4c945d2b4bdabb490961cf986391e
commit r15-9491-g517f7e3f02b4c945d2b4bdabb490961cf986391e
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Fri Ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f62e5d720de829cf346b799f3463fee53728ba6c
commit r15-9490-gf62e5d720de829cf346b799f3463fee53728ba6c
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119751
--- Comment #16 from Gaius Mulley ---
RE: ASM examples probably easier to continue this thread over at PR
modula2/119779
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282
--- Comment #10 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Bad commit:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=ff6686d2e5f797d6c6a36ad14a7084bc1dc350e4
Minimal testcase:
int a[];
short b, c;
long d;
__attribute__((noipa)) long(e)() {}
static int f(in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #40 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 61131
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61131&action=edit
p.ii.xz
Reduction is pretty slow, but:
```
$ g++ p.ii -w -flto=auto -O3 -shared
p.ii: In function ‘MpRepeatedStri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119828
Bug ID: 119828
Summary: RISC-V gcc rv64gc fails to optimize away stack frame
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119828
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108016
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||konstantin.vladimirov@gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119828
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118182
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7b1aeea684a8191d1503b4022cea8d0d218ca65
commit r14-11619-gb7b1aeea684a8191d1503b4022cea8d0d218ca65
Author: Alexandre O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118601
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56b3858b6a1118d2e27e3047d5ee52faec7aac83
commit r14-11620-g56b3858b6a1118d2e27e3047d5ee52faec7aac83
Author: Alexandre Ol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119825
--- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch ---
looks like the error comes from name resolution and is also reproducible with a
much more simple
Program-id. NofBug.
Data division.
Working-storage section.
01 billTo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119825
Simon Sobisch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116125
--- Comment #10 from Kito Cheng ---
ping, does it possible to back port to release branches? it seems land on trunk
for a while :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116093
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119722
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 116093 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282
--- Comment #12 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Thanks Sam, I'm restarting reduction this time checking if it compiles with
trunk GCC as well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
(In reply to mcccs from comment #10)
Using the return value of e() when it didn't return anything is undefined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116093
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45a708d7bf8369930f4f770bbb7047941727ba41
commit r15-9513-g45a708d7bf8369930f4f770bbb7047941727ba41
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119822
Bug ID: 119822
Summary: Linker failure with std::stacktrace
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #36 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 61127
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61127&action=edit
patch (untested)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119824
Bug ID: 119824
Summary: initialization of a static member variable with type
auto or decltype(auto) is not accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #37 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 61128
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61128&action=edit
updated patch (regtests and bootstraps)
Updated patch. Streaming summaries seems to work and fixes the testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119825
Bug ID: 119825
Summary: gcobol XML generate forces bug report
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: cobol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211
Bug 119211 depends on bug 119302, which changed state.
Bug 119302 Summary: cobol.3 manpage is installed without program_transform_name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119302
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119302
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:248e228fecdfb68833481eff8c3c0c7aa9703a8d
commit r15-9497-g248e228fecdfb68833481eff8c3c0c7aa9703a8d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119822
--- Comment #3 from M Welinder ---
Thanks. Confirmed working.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111075
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:628aecb050bbbc4bb0bd4468c474623e20d64e21
commit r15-9501-g628aecb050bbbc4bb0bd4468c474623e20d64e21
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71094
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d91aab4dd6814ca54c211a93fec3f072745a52c4
commit r15-9502-gd91aab4dd6814ca54c211a93fec3f072745a52c4
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119784
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ed2fa4768f3d318b8ace5bd4a095596e06fad7b
commit r15-9503-g5ed2fa4768f3d318b8ace5bd4a095596e06fad7b
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Apr 14 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119824
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Even simplier is rejected:
```
extern unsigned t;
auto t = 1u;
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119824
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heiko at hexco dot de
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113546
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.2.1
Summary|[13/14 Regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||cwg1347
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed on trunk, backports to follow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cf6b52d04df22726d88eef113211b3cc08515de
commit r15-9499-g9cf6b52d04df22726d88eef113211b3cc08515de
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106948
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119822
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71094
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111075
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #11)
> Created attachment 61123 [details]
> fix
>
> This seems like an appropriate fix, can someone test it on an affected
> target?
A spot-check on x86_64 darwin21 s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119822
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Sorry it is documented here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/libstdc++/manual/manual/using.html#manual.intro.using.flags
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119823
Bug ID: 119823
Summary: -Q --help=optimizers output is misleading for -O0 +
inconsistent docs in the manual
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71094
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71094
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113546
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f6285f2918f1835ec7c35c37cbec8c10a091b57
commit r14-11617-g5f6285f2918f1835ec7c35c37cbec8c10a091b57
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119717
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:727f330f9ac661339af1121fc5c9b67dd0d35872
commit r15-9505-g727f330f9ac661339af1121fc5c9b67dd0d35872
Author: Qing Zhao
Date: Mon Apr 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119717
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119547
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119533
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119298
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e2011ab13de3e70774f869b356f5f9c750780b34
commit r15-9495-ge2011ab13de3e70774f869b356f5f9c750780b34
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119779
Zbigniew changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbigniew2011 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119816
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
The other thing is `-fuse-ld=gold`, the gold linker itself has been deprecated
in binutils upstream. You could also try removing that too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119821
Bug ID: 119821
Summary: FE (parser): CONFIGURATION SECTION rejects valid code
- empty paragraphs
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119820
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
An example I can think of could be:
struct I {
using difference_type = int;
using value_type = char;
value_type operator*() const;
I& operator++();
I operator++(int);
I& operator--();
I operator--(int);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #34 from Jan Hubicka ---
I there is only problem that ipa_return_value_sum value sum does not survive
from compile time to WPA then we only need to add streaming code for it. This
should be straightforward and there is no need to add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111075
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111075
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
.cfi_startproc
subq$8, %rsp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
callboring
addq$8, %rsp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
jmp continuation
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size entry, .-entry
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 15.0.1 20250415 (experimen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119820
Bug ID: 119820
Summary: Formatting ranges make a subrange via ranges::subrange
(__first, __first + __n)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119628
--- Comment #9 from Ken Jin ---
I tried this out with CPython's interpreter that uses tail calls with the patch
at https://gitlab.com/x86-gcc/gcc/-/tree/users/hjl/saved/master?ref_type=heads
applied.
I get a roughly 10% speedup on the pystones
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119244
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119296
Bug 119296 depends on bug 119244, which changed state.
Bug 119244 Summary: cobol/libgcobol should allow libquadmath to provide 128b
floating support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119244
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119296
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119813
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119628
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Ken Jin from comment #9)
> :
>0: 55 pushq %rbp
>1: 48 89 e5movq%rsp, %rbp
>4: 48 89 f
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
