[Bug fortran/119669] [15 Regression] ICE in compare_parameter since r15-7449

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119669 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Koenig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64319b2ccae2fdfae06347545e031e56d790dad7 commit r15-9406-g64319b2ccae2fdfae06347545e031e56d790dad7 Author: Thomas Koenig Date: S

[Bug fortran/119669] [15 Regression] ICE in compare_parameter since r15-7449

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119669 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/119767] New: libgccjit fails on sparc

hared --enable-languages=c,c++,jit --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib --host=sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu --build=sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 15.0.1 20250413 (experimental) (GCC) ```

[Bug rtl-optimization/115568] [12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O2 with "-fno-tree-sink -fno-tree-ter -fschedule-insns" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-6122-g9407058a430316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115568 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/115568] [12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O2 with "-fno-tree-sink -fno-tree-ter -fschedule-insns" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-6122-g9407058a430316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115568 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3232e151654f3998926c8e82a2ffd911c6e74df4 commit r12-11034-g3232e151654f3998926c8e82a2ffd911c6e74df4 Author: Vladimir N. Mak

[Bug rtl-optimization/115568] [12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O2 with "-fno-tree-sink -fno-tree-ter -fschedule-insns" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-6122-g9407058a430316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115568 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6675cf3abd09731ec8360ba8ac8928b63b33b7bb commit r12-11035-g6675cf3abd09731ec8360ba8ac8928b63b33b7bb Author: Richard Biener

[Bug c++/119778] [13/14/15 regression] -Wuninitialized crashed with longjmp/setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119778 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14/15/15 regression] |[13/14/15 regression] |-W

[Bug cobol/119776] New: COBOL '-fmax-errors', 'Separate'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119776 Bug ID: 119776 Summary: COBOL '-fmax-errors', 'Separate' Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: cobol

[Bug c++/119778] New: gcc gimple crashes on some setjmp/longjmp code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119778 Bug ID: 119778 Summary: gcc gimple crashes on some setjmp/longjmp code Product: gcc Version: 13.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug modula2/119751] There's a need to tidy up m2 subdirectories' contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119751 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-04-13 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/119683] [13/14/15 Regression] recalculating the return value which was already in the register right before function return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119683 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/119765] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/amd64-abi-9.c on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119765 --- Comment #3 from nightstrike --- Is this a case of "skip windows", or a case of "skip targets with/without feature X"? Also, I'm a little surprised, as based on the name of the test, I would think it was testing a feature of the cpu type, no

[Bug cobol/119777] New: [15 Regression] COBOL '-fsyntax-only', 'RejectNegative'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119777 Bug ID: 119777 Summary: [15 Regression] COBOL '-fsyntax-only', 'RejectNegative' Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug modula2/119779] ASM examples no longer work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119779 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/115639] Large variations in compilation times involving static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115639 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5869a881442aa4214d5deed7cfe0d352bcca1fd4 commit r15-9414-g5869a881442aa4214d5deed7cfe0d352bcca1fd4 Author: Patrick Palka Date: S

[Bug modula2/119779] New: ASM examples no longer work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119779 Bug ID: 119779 Summary: ASM examples no longer work Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: modula2 As

[Bug bootstrap/119689] [15 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure on i586-linux since r15-9239

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119689 --- Comment #18 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31e31bbeea657496eaa2d8bf629f6e61c6cd1266 commit r14-11600-g31e31bbeea657496eaa2d8bf629f6e61c6cd1266 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug c++/119778] [14/15/15 regression] -Wuninitialized crashed with longjmp/setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119778 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Summary|gcc gi

[Bug rtl-optimization/115568] [12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O2 with "-fno-tree-sink -fno-tree-ter -fschedule-insns" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-6122-g9407058a430316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115568 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a2e39a5349a36deea33f5fb078edfe658daaf50 commit r13-9521-g1a2e39a5349a36deea33f5fb078edfe658daaf50 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug bootstrap/119689] [15 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure on i586-linux since r15-9239

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119689 --- Comment #19 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a2e39a5349a36deea33f5fb078edfe658daaf50 commit r13-9521-g1a2e39a5349a36deea33f5fb078edfe658daaf50 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug rtl-optimization/115568] [12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O2 with "-fno-tree-sink -fno-tree-ter -fschedule-insns" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-6122-g9407058a430316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115568 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc93babdcceb4293e4a64c0770786dc8aefc1a4e commit r14-11599-gdc93babdcceb4293e4a64c0770786dc8aefc1a4e Author: Vladimir N. Mak

[Bug c++/119778] [14/15/15 regression] -Wuninitialized crashed with longjmp/setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119778 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||13.3.1, 14.2.1, 15.0 Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/115568] [12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O2 with "-fno-tree-sink -fno-tree-ter -fschedule-insns" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-6122-g9407058a430316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115568 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7578243dcd42855e4a8ae85ef8ab2598f0f6cbe9 commit r13-9520-g7578243dcd42855e4a8ae85ef8ab2598f0f6cbe9 Author: Vladimir N. Maka

[Bug rtl-optimization/115568] [12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O2 with "-fno-tree-sink -fno-tree-ter -fschedule-insns" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-6122-g9407058a430316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115568 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31e31bbeea657496eaa2d8bf629f6e61c6cd1266 commit r14-11600-g31e31bbeea657496eaa2d8bf629f6e61c6cd1266 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug bootstrap/119689] [15 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure on i586-linux since r15-9239

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119689 --- Comment #20 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6675cf3abd09731ec8360ba8ac8928b63b33b7bb commit r12-11035-g6675cf3abd09731ec8360ba8ac8928b63b33b7bb Author: Richard Biener

[Bug rust/119508] Hundreds of rust tests XPASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508 --- Comment #12 from Owen A. --- I can't replicate this on my end anymore -- is it still present on x86_64?

[Bug target/119765] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/amd64-abi-9.c on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119765 --- Comment #4 from nightstrike --- Ah, I think I understand better. It's not the AMD64 ABI saying to pass the register count in EAX, it's the SysV or whatever ABI saying to do it, and the Windows ABI says to do something else. So really instead

[Bug libfortran/119502] Runtime segfault when closing invalid unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119502 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee6173800ed1f9b653a85019ad2fa8e6d883823a commit r15-9415-gee6173800ed1f9b653a85019ad2fa8e6d883823a Author: Jerry DeLisle Date: S

[Bug rust/119508] Hundreds of rust tests XPASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508 --- Comment #13 from Sam James --- I'm not seeing it anywhere, and I consistently was before.

[Bug target/119628] Need better mechanisms to manage register saves in callee for tail calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119628 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug target/119781] New: Apple Rosetta 2 x86-64 emulator does not support x86-64-v2 SAHF instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119781 Bug ID: 119781 Summary: Apple Rosetta 2 x86-64 emulator does not support x86-64-v2 SAHF instruction Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/119780] New: [13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O{1,s} : runtime hang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119780 Bug ID: 119780 Summary: [13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O{1,s} : runtime hang Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/119781] Apple Rosetta 2 x86-64 emulator does not support x86-64-v2 SAHF instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119781 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/119780] [13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O{1,s} : runtime hang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119780 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.4 Known to fail|

[Bug cobol/119777] [15 Regression] COBOL '-fsyntax-only', 'RejectNegative'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119777 Simon Sobisch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simonsobisch at gnu dot org --- Comment

[Bug cobol/119771] New: FE (parser): CONSTANT AS LENGTH OF does not error - but result in length of zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119771 Bug ID: 119771 Summary: FE (parser): CONSTANT AS LENGTH OF does not error - but result in length of zero Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug c++/119762] [modules] Error when loading an unused defaulted function on top of a used one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119762 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 119762, which changed state. Bug 119762 Summary: [modules] Error when loading an unused defaulted function on top of a used one https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119762 What|Removed

[Bug c/113688] verify_type fails for compatible structs with FAM in C23, builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c and gnu23-tag-1.c with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug cobol/119772] New: FE: COBOL2025/2026 (original GnuCOBOL extension) LENGTH OF usage-specification missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119772 Bug ID: 119772 Summary: FE: COBOL2025/2026 (original GnuCOBOL extension) LENGTH OF usage-specification missing Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug c/113688] verify_type fails for compatible structs with FAM in C23, builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c and gnu23-tag-1.c with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou --- Please revert on the 14 branch before the 14.3 release is made.

[Bug middle-end/104800] reodering of potentially trapping operations and volatile stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104800 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug cobol/119770] New: FLOAT-DECIMAL support + "cannot MOVE '_stack1'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119770 Bug ID: 119770 Summary: FLOAT-DECIMAL support + "cannot MOVE '_stack1'" Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/119133] [14 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in mark_label_nuses (emit-rtl.cc:3896) with -O -fno-tree-ter and _Float16 since r14-1131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119133 Pavol Rusnak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pavol at rusnak dot io --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug jit/119767] libgccjit fails on sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119767 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Seems that Emacs fails with 10..trunk at least (not tried older than 10). The original Emacs report is with 14, but I've reproduced it with trunk. (If useful, SSH is available to a container on this machine tha

[Bug target/118892] [14 Regression] ICE (segfault) in rebuild_jump_labels on aarch64-linux-gnu since r14-5289

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892 --- Comment #19 from Pavol Rusnak --- ISTM that fix should be backported together with https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119133 Last but not least, when trying the fix locally, I had to backport the missing `force_lowpart_subreg` fun

[Bug c/113688] [14 regression] verify_type fails for compatible structs with FAM in C23, builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c and gnu23-tag-1.c with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|verify_type fails for |[14 regression] verify_type

[Bug c/113688] verify_type fails for compatible structs with FAM in C23, builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c and gnu23-tag-1.c with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688 --- Comment #15 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --- It fixes a regression (but maybe I should have kept this in the title until the release). Still, if it causes too much trouble, we can revert it. But let me understand the issue first. What i

[Bug tree-optimization/119773] wrong code at -O{s,1,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119773 --- Comment #1 from Kavya Chopra --- it also seems to have compilation errors (i believe the compiler hangs?) for some previous versions

[Bug tree-optimization/119773] New: wrong code at -O{s,1,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119773 Bug ID: 119773 Summary: wrong code at -O{s,1,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tr

[Bug tree-optimization/119773] [12/13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O{s,1,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119773 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|wrong code at -O{s,1,2,3} |[12/13/14/15 regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/119773] [12/13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O{s,1,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119773 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > 11+ hangs at -O1. .. at runtime, that is. Anyway, bisecting.

[Bug c/119774] New: Missing -Wcast-align for reduced-alignment types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119774 Bug ID: 119774 Summary: Missing -Wcast-align for reduced-alignment types Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c/113688] [14 regression] verify_type fails for compatible structs with FAM in C23, builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c and gnu23-tag-1.c with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688 --- Comment #17 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (BTW: Any idea why the preceding commit does not appear in bugzilla?)

[Bug c++/119775] New: [OpenMP] ICE with append_args in iobj member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119775 Bug ID: 119775 Summary: [OpenMP] ICE with append_args in iobj member function Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug fortran/100120] associated intrinsic failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Stat

[Bug fortran/100818] A temporary is passed to associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100818 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resoluti

[Bug fortran/100816] Wrong span on widechar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100816 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/119766] -gsplit-dwarf and -fdebug-types-section leads to multiple .debug_info.dwo sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119766 --- Comment #3 from Simon Marchi --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > My reading of the documentation, that gcc is doing the correct thing here. > You requested that the types split into their own section and splitting it > out to a

[Bug fortran/100819] Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100819 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/100821] Deferred character with wrong length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100821 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug modula2/119751] There's a need to tidy up m2 subdirectories' contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119751 --- Comment #11 from Gaius Mulley --- Replying to comment#7 I think the solution is to extend the ISO attributes (eg <* DIALECT iso10514 *>) to specify the modula-2 dialect and also have another attribute to warn if the user module is importing

[Bug rust/119508] Hundreds of rust tests XPASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508 --- Comment #15 from Owen A. --- https://code.wildebeest.org/git/mirror/gcc/commit/?id=89ca1e3cb697a87f02682a1fb1f62f02d0671c57 Wildebeest seems to have the patch. It seems like all of the linked tests are failing for other reasons, though. Doe

[Bug rust/119508] Hundreds of rust tests XPASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508 --- Comment #16 from Owen A. --- *linked builders

[Bug cobol/119790] New: FE (parser): CONSTANT AS figurative-constant broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119790 Bug ID: 119790 Summary: FE (parser): CONSTANT AS figurative-constant broken Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug testsuite/119791] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-check-10.c on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119791 Bug ID: 119791 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-check-10.c on Windows Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsui

[Bug testsuite/119791] FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-check-10.c on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119791 --- Comment #2 from nightstrike --- Created attachment 61103 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61103&action=edit asm on Windows

[Bug testsuite/119791] FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-check-10.c on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119791 --- Comment #3 from nightstrike --- Created attachment 61104 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61104&action=edit asm on Linux

[Bug target/119781] Apple Rosetta 2 x86-64 emulator does not support x86-64-v2 SAHF instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119781 --- Comment #5 from Dimitri John Ledkov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > >1) Updating documentation for the -msahf option to mention that Apple > >Rosetta 2 does not support this instruction would be very helpful. I will > >se

[Bug target/119781] Apple Rosetta 2 x86-64 emulator does not support x86-64-v2 SAHF instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119781 --- Comment #7 from Dimitri John Ledkov --- Note that this seems to be coming from: ix86_fp_comparison_strategy

[Bug target/119781] Apple Rosetta 2 x86-64 emulator does not support x86-64-v2 SAHF instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119781 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- x86_64v2 is defined in the ABI: https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/77566eb03bc6a326811cb7e9 And it includes sahf .

[Bug target/119781] Apple Rosetta 2 x86-64 emulator does not support x86-64-v2 SAHF instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119781 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- >1) Updating documentation for the -msahf option to mention that Apple Rosetta >2 does not support this instruction would be very helpful. I will send a patch >with a proposed documentation update. No, P

[Bug target/119781] Apple Rosetta 2 x86-64 emulator does not support x86-64-v2 SAHF instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119781 --- Comment #4 from Dimitri John Ledkov --- Created attachment 61094 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61094&action=edit 0001-doc-Document-lack-of-SAHF-support-on-Apple-Rosetta-2.patch https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patche

[Bug target/119781] Apple Rosetta 2 x86-64 emulator does not support x86-64-v2 SAHF instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119781 --- Comment #6 from Dimitri John Ledkov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > x86_64v2 is defined in the ABI: > https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/77566eb03bc6a326811cb7e9 > > And it includes sahf . Yes, but it is a

[Bug target/119628] Need better mechanisms to manage register saves in callee for tail calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119628 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- no_caller_saved_registers only works with XMM and ZMM, not YMM, since YMM load will clear the upper 256 bits of ZMM.

[Bug target/119781] Apple Rosetta 2 x86-64 emulator does not support x86-64-v2 SAHF instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119781 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- For LLVM to produce the bad code you might need -ftrapping-math which defaults to on for GCC while defaults to off for clang. That might be the reason why LLVM does not produce this instruction.

[Bug target/119781] Apple Rosetta 2 x86-64 emulator does not support x86-64-v2 SAHF instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119781 --- Comment #10 from Dimitri John Ledkov --- I agree that this is not a bug in GCC. But users are in pain and github is full of bug reports against random projects from many users claiming that nothing works. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc

[Bug c/119774] Missing -Wcast-align for reduced-alignment types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119774 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Wcast-align only works for strict alignment targets.

[Bug target/119781] Apple Rosetta 2 x86-64 emulator does not support x86-64-v2 SAHF instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119781 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Dimitri John Ledkov from comment #6) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > > x86_64v2 is defined in the ABI: > > https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/77566eb03bc6a326811cb

[Bug fortran/100818] A temporary is passed to associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100818 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/118501] [14 regression] aarch64: ICE in simplify_context::simplify_subreg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118501 Pavol Rusnak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pavol at rusnak dot io --- Comment #15 f

[Bug fortran/100818] A temporary is passed to associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100818 --- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Thomas, Thanks, that does indeed explain it. The é in José? I have put Sandra in copy because I just wrote to her about these PRs a few minutes ago. Obrigado Paul On Sun, 13 A

[Bug tree-optimization/119778] [13/14/15 regression] -Wuninitialized crashed with longjmp/setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119778 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61095|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/119778] [13/14/15 regression] -Wuninitialized crashed with longjmp/setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119778 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.4.0 Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/119778] [13/14/15 regression] -Wuninitialized crashed with longjmp/setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119778 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61095 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61095&action=edit First step in reducing

[Bug testsuite/113633] FAIL: gcc.dg/bf-ms-attrib.c execution test, wrong size for ms_struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113633 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rust/119508] Hundreds of rust tests XPASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508 --- Comment #14 from Mark Wielaard --- https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders?tags=gccrust Little endian gccrust-debian-i386 gccrust-fedora-arm64 gccrust-fedora-ppc64le gccrust-fedora-x86_64 seems green Big endian gccrust-debian-pp

[Bug cobol/119244] cobol/libgcobol should allow libquadmath to provide 128b floating support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119244 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug jit/119782] New: libgccjit test fails on hppa (FAIL: jit.dg/test-combination.c, initial compilation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119782 Bug ID: 119782 Summary: libgccjit test fails on hppa (FAIL: jit.dg/test-combination.c, initial compilation) Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keyw

[Bug testsuite/119782] libgccjit test fails on hppa (FAIL: jit.dg/test-combination.c, initial compilation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119782 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org As

[Bug cobol/119244] cobol/libgcobol should allow libquadmath to provide 128b floating support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119244 --- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/680622.html should fix that (stop using libquadmath for COBOL altogether unless it is really needed (which means long double is not IEEE quad (so

[Bug cobol/119244] cobol/libgcobol should allow libquadmath to provide 128b floating support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119244 --- Comment #33 from Robert Dubner --- Thank you. I'll give that a try.

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 115639, which changed state. Bug 115639 Summary: Large variations in compilation times involving static_assert https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115639 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/115639] Large variations in compilation times involving static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115639 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/119783] libgccjit test test-error-impossible-must-tail-call.c.exe fails on hppa (verify_code: actual: "cannot tail-call: memory reference or volatile after call" != expected: "cannot ta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119783 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-04-13 Component|jit

[Bug tree-optimization/119757] [15 regression] RISC-V: ICE when building curl-8.13.0 (in operator[], at vec.h:910)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119757 Li Pan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pan2.li at intel dot com --- Comment #8 from L

[Bug tree-optimization/119614] [15 regression] protobuf-29.4 fails to build with -O2 (error: cannot tail-call: call and return value are different)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 61100 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61100&action=edit gcc15-pr119614-lto.patch Even more hacky patch which actually works though. As I haven't figured out how to

[Bug c++/86273] confusing diagnostic for member-declaration with missing identifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86273 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug testsuite/119789] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/20021029-1.c on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119789 Bug ID: 119789 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/20021029-1.c on Windows Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug c/113688] [14 regression] verify_type fails for compatible structs with FAM in C23, builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c and gnu23-tag-1.c with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688 --- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou --- TYPE_CANONICAL is the main discriminant used for aggregate types by the type system (as implemented by useless_type_conversion_p). In this regard, how can "For checking or computing TYPE_CANONICAL, ignore t

  1   2   >