https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117311
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117266
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #14)
> A bigger, philosophical question: we are always told that builtins are
> better for the compiler than inline assembly, as it gives the compiler more
> informa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117313
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265
--- Comment #14 from H. Peter Anvin ---
Note: comment 13 is not intended to be rhetorical but is a genuine question.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117266
--- Comment #16 from H. Peter Anvin ---
Well, if that is the way you feel about it. It is certainly different from the
messages we get in other situations, so it is a bit confusing to me.
It isn't *that* unusual that you know a priori that the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117313
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Created attachment 59452 [details]
> Reduced testcase
This is rejected by GCC 14:
/tmp/f.c:2:23: error: flexible array member in a struct with no named members
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-27
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95284
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14907
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nicholas Miell from comment #4)
> This also occurs on AMD64 without any special attributes (the ABI passes
> params in registers already).
>
> When compiling:
> extern char c2(char);
> char c1(char c)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
Maybe what you want is really a builtin does the load/store and the ability to
output the register # that the address is formed into instead of this
inline-asm. This might be better than what you are asking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #413 from Oleg Endo ---
Created attachment 59442
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59442&action=edit
Reduced test case for comment #405
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #405)
> File too large to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42150
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29112
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48039
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52319
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-12-06 00:00:00 |2024-10-26
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49240
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49783
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52033
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52873
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Last reconfirmed|2015-12-06
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53625
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54178
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed|2015-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50600
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still hangs on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62122
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecf80e7daf7f27defe1ca724e265f723d10e7681
commit r15-4696-gecf80e7daf7f27defe1ca724e265f723d10e7681
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117301
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao Liu ---
yes, new instructions are still under review for binutils and not landed on
Binutil trunk, but GCC check_effective_target_avx10_2 target with "old"
_mm256_mask_vpdpbssd_epi32.
The problem should be gone when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62230
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-12-06 00:00:00 |2024-10-26
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64556
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64869
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-12-06 00:00:00 |2024-10-26
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63725
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62122
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34343
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34374
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29958
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34511
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37796
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38882
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42148
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42411
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
The first error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35793
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35984
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117307
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
```
int a;
float *b, *c;
float d;
void e() {
for (; a; a++) {
if (d) {
c[0] = b[0];
c[1] = b[1];
} else if (b[1])
c[0] = b[0] * 0;
b += 2;
c += 2;
}
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36619
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117176
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
To state the obvious bisect landed on r15-4324-gaccb85345edb91 "middle-end:
support SLP early break"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38327
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38330
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42413
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still hangs on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42948
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43041
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44058
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16097
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16096
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117176
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-October/666250.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117308
Bug ID: 117308
Summary: Undocumented implementation limits of C++
specification (ISO/IEC 14882)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18762
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24480
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17954
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18221
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18205
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17320
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117307
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25988
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18765
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112274
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117307
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
int blend_graya_float_j;
float *blend_graya_float_ovl_ptr, *blend_graya_float_dst_ptr;
float blend_graya_float_dst_ptr_3;
void blend_graya_float() {
float a_b;
for (; blend_graya_float_j; blend_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29463
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31417
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
The errors are still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32181
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33910
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33908
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32318
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still true on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #414 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #410)
> Created attachment 59432 [details]
> a trial patch for c#404
>
> It's difficult to see what is going on, because the test case is too huge.
> Looking at the p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33994
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline:
eric@fomalhaut:~/build/gcc/native/tmp> gcc -c main_windows-constructors.adb
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 15.0.0 20241024 (experiment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18454
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716
--- Comment #11 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I asked the C FE and it wants to get this fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46318
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41854
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42793
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
p-O3
bootstrap-lto bootstrap-cet'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241026 (experimental)
40fedaf35fa99a9728d5b84d47035f4c92e1ba90 (Gentoo 15.0. p, commit
d4278761ff6c0c703c8cf4d105cac664e15a0df8)
```
anitizer --enable-languages=c
CFLAGS='-O1 -g0' CXXFLAGS='-O1 -g0' LDFLAGS='-O1 -g0'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20241026 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15800
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117306
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117176
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50263
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16078
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117305
Bug ID: 117305
Summary: include files processed differently depending on
directory they were fetched from
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15605
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
The second error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16075
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16077
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16214
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117305
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13370
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15610
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15844
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15845
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18453
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Still fails on mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117234
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59444
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59444&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16076
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error is still missing.
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
