https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117139
Bug ID: 117139
Summary: ICE with invalid constexpr expression (tree check:
expected integer_cst, have real_cst in get_len, at
tree.h:6509)
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115033
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.4.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114207
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.4.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e3580191b449e599a4c8d7bfd634df2ca351d4a
commit r12-10772-g0e3580191b449e599a4c8d7bfd634df2ca351d4a
Author: Sam James
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117140
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect r15-4324-gaccb85345edb91 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113952
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |sjames at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115545
--- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks OK on powerpc, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117109
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23e7b702521aa5611060a0b8dd194f3801fc
commit r15-4343-g23e7b702521aa5611060a0b8dd194f3801fc
Author: David Malcolm
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117109
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117111
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> reorg splits insns because doing so gives more opportunities to fill delay
> slot, particularly when the asm-output step would generate multiple
> instructions for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117111
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
But reorg should handle that fine. It's got code to track dependencies and not
move something in an unsafe manner. Of course all that code is incredibly
hairy as it predates a control flow graph and real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117140
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
/* We are going to use the operand cache API, such as
SET_USE, SET_DEF, and FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_FAST. The operand
cache for each statement should be up-to-date. */
gcc_checking_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108250
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
Various IPA fixes have been backported now including for PR111613. I haven't
yet checked if LLVM still fails but I suspect it works now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115135
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117136
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117140
Bug ID: 117140
Summary: [15 regression] RISC-V: ICE in initialize_flags_in_bb
for rv32gcv
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106057
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.5.0, 11.5.0, 12.4.1,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106057
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-15
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106057
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
I guess that's why Honza didn't add it in
r13-1241-g7fd34782b95bbe1b4dc9936b8923f86d4aaee379, actually. So the question
is just if the testcase is valid or not. If it isn't, we're all done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111245
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Honza?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #22 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #18)
[...snip...]
>
> I have work-in-progress patches that implement this as a new
> -fdiagnostics-add-output=
> option, but they're not yet ready to push upstream
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117082
Haochen Jiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117142
Bug ID: 117142
Summary: ICE: verify_flow_info failed: error: returns_twice
call is not first in basic block 2 at -O1 and above
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117146
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>Extracting preprocessed source for this is a pain as it doesn't ICE with that.
Since it is in tree_decl_hash, that looks like a GC issue ...
So `--param=ggc-min-expand=1 --param=ggc-min-heapsize=1`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117146
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
It also might be related to r9-2651-gbdd039843c2df9 ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117147
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
==2895651== Invalid read of size 1
==2895651==at 0x23DD0DF: vect_build_slp_tree_1(vec_info*, unsigned char*,
vec<_stmt_vec_info*, va_heap, vl_ptr>, unsigned int, poly_int<1u, unsigned
long>*, bool*, bool*, t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117147
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Maybe a dupe of PR117060?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117148
Bug ID: 117148
Summary: `-Os` results in much larger code than `-O2` about
bitfields
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117110
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:384faebde257b0b5a0aa334718ef1b645d4c8d1e
commit r15-4345-g384faebde257b0b5a0aa334718ef1b645d4c8d1e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117147
Bug ID: 117147
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building vtk-9.3.0 (crash in
vect_build_slp_tree_1)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117148
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117147
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116838
--- Comment #6 from Jamaika ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> If you enable C++20 (or C++23) and GCC tells you that your code is not
> compatible with C++20, fix the code.
>
> (In reply to Jamaika from comment #0)
> > Codec vv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105495
--- Comment #8 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #7)
> Oh, the sample code contained a typo:
>
>*(intptr_t*) out = ival;
>
> should be
>
>*(intptr_t*) out = icmp;
>
> However it doesn't affect the bug.
ahh sorry pos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105495
--- Comment #7 from LIU Hao ---
Oh, the sample code contained a typo:
*(intptr_t*) out = ival;
should be
*(intptr_t*) out = icmp;
However it doesn't affect the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117148
--- Comment #2 from LIU Hao ---
Oh, the sample code contained a typo:
*(intptr_t*) out = ival;
should be
*(intptr_t*) out = icmp;
However it doesn't affect the bug. (https://godbolt.org/z/fdxbbadnj) It's
because GCC fail to inline `ato
osix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20241014 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117116
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 59348
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59348&action=edit
Proposed patch
Patch in testing.
Just leave CONST_VECTOR RTXes that won't simplify to integer in memory. The
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117139
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Note that for GCC 14 without checking (see https://godbolt.org/z/Tb53j8WWz),
the user reports an odd "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" note:
"""
gcc-14 (14.2.1_p20240921 p1) also is a bit weird about th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117139
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-14
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117141
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54050
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|chaining|Add support for chaining of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111425
--- Comment #9 from Frank Scheiner ---
Looks like this is fixed in gcc-15-20241013, I assume thanks to the fix for
#116627. Just checked that cross-building Linux v6.12-rc3 for ia64 with the
mentioned snapshot now works w/o using the workaround
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117144
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117144
Bug ID: 117144
Summary: More warnings if gcc -E xx.c -o xx.i and gcc -c xx.i
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117144
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117144
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note you can easily reproduce it by using `-save-temps` .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113341
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117145
Bug ID: 117145
Summary: ICE: in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.cc:355 at
-O1 and above with vector_size
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Summary|ICE: in make_ss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117139
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Even more reduced:
```
constexpr int myconst = 5.0;
```
Also ICEs with complex integer too:
```
constexpr int myconst = 5i;
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117136
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91682
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79306
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on valid code |ICE on valid code building
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952
--- Comment #19 from Sam James ---
Is this one essentially fixed? I don't see a way of handling it for non-ELF and
I doubt anyone really cares much about that for an optimisation like this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117116
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org|uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79786
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117136
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Running f951 under valgrind I see:
==5119== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==5119==at 0xAF2DFC: gfc_conv_procedure_call(gfc_se*, gfc_symbol*,
gfc_actual_arglist*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107151
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100825
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blubban at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100825
--- Comment #16 from Patrick Palka ---
*** Bug 103884 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103884
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117140
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49564
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 47170, which changed state.
Bug 47170 Summary: [cppcheck][PATCH] found resource leaks in
gcc/intl/localealias.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47170
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115033
--- Comment #26 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2686f12e9345d95a2d6b7291bd777501d197869
commit r12-10768-gf2686f12e9345d95a2d6b7291bd777501d197869
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114207
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e098149b6b2c61ffe9e758dcd3ef021a78f2d132
commit r12-10767-ge098149b6b2c61ffe9e758dcd3ef021a78f2d132
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787
--- Comment #26 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92889011625f16e7eed654a137b9c14a29282917
commit r12-10769-g92889011625f16e7eed654a137b9c14a29282917
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65b67169fb1c641a11973988bd439e255d62131a
commit r12-10771-g65b67169fb1c641a11973988bd439e255d62131a
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47170
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109985
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b454ad0e4eb6bb38a6dfe15a43acb6792315640b
commit r12-10770-gb454ad0e4eb6bb38a6dfe15a43acb6792315640b
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116883
Huaqi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106057
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||EH, wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117146
Bug ID: 117146
Summary: ICE on error recovery with openscad-2021.01
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117146
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
==2895333== Invalid read of size 2
==2895333==at 0x1C94E6B: UnknownInlinedFun (hash-map-traits.h:50)
==2895333==by 0x1C94E6B: UnknownInlinedFun (hash-map.h:52)
==2895333==by 0x1C94E6B: hash_table >::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109985
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109985
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0629e32278ef3966c00e889d0c6dce1de6115cc
commit r14-10787-gf0629e32278ef3966c00e889d0c6dce1de6115cc
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117140
--- Comment #3 from Edwin Lu ---
Created attachment 59349
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59349&action=edit
reduced testcase
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I suspect r15-4324-gaccb85345edb91 .
Confirmed to b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #23 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #21)
[...snip...]
>
> FWIW SARIF has a distinction between a "result" and a "notification" where
> the former refer to the software under test, and the latter to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #400 from Oleg Endo ---
There was a latent issue that popped up as PR 113533 -- the cost estimation of
sh_rtx_costs for mem loads/stores were a bit distorted.
I've rebased the LRA devel branch
https://github.com/olegendo/gcc/tree/de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao Liu ---
*** Bug 117082 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117142
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-15
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117082
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117143
Bug ID: 117143
Summary: program crash under -O3 optimization or higher with
function optimization flags assigned
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117142
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117143
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59350
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59350&action=edit
Better testcase
you can use the noinline attribute to get the same effect, this has been fixed
in GCC 14 ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117143
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116749
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 117143 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114593
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bb9418811d2ce870bd1c1c98a2ddca1bdcce998
commit r12-10765-g3bb9418811d2ce870bd1c1c98a2ddca1bdcce998
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114593
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117133
--- Comment #4 from Nathaniel Shead ---
This is a bit of a strange case... strictly this (new) behaviour is correct, I
think, since gEmbeddedNNUEBigData has internal linkage (see
https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.link#4.9) and as such is not actuall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114593
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b62c956f775408b9058a3c9b738462e5d67d8df7
commit r14-10785-gb62c956f775408b9058a3c9b738462e5d67d8df7
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114593
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aff061f0f51e2547b04c8d24c3b0dc713a6d62a3
commit r14-10784-gaff061f0f51e2547b04c8d24c3b0dc713a6d62a3
Author: Steve Baird
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114593
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb61a7a203c5de3552e11bd633bc351463e51594
commit r12-10764-gfb61a7a203c5de3552e11bd633bc351463e51594
Author: Steve Baird
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117134
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117116
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117135
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
The additional debug output with your patch is:
Wide D_T_FMT for C locale:
eofbit: 0 failbit: 0 badbit: 0
22_locale/time_get/get/wchar_t/5.cc:29: int main(): Assertion 'err ==
std::ios::eofbit' failed.
1 - 100 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
