https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114682
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114682
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Mine, similar to PR 102138 but slightly different because this becomes a load
which is more similar to what phiprop does.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116833
--- Comment #5 from Fiodar ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> More likely Symbian os support should be removed as I highly doubt anyone
> has tested it in the last 10 years.
I build ScummVM for Symbian with selfbuilded GCC ≥ 5.4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116078
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
So this does not make much sense, maybe before there was something being
miscompiled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116078
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
or rather the order of some operations for the arguments cause some other
missing optimizations.
I doubt there is not much to be done from the front-end side of things either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Mark Mentovai from comment #20)
> Created attachment 59189 [details]
> Patch for macOS 14/Xcode 16
>
> (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #19)
> > The master branch has been updated by Iain D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112116
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116834
Bug ID: 116834
Summary: "warning: null format string" false positive with
UBSAN
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116822
--- Comment #1 from Edwin Lu ---
Bisected down to r15-3794-g2c04f175de4 as the first bad commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #22 from Mark Mentovai ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #21)
> Thta is quite surprising - since the SDK should reflect the symbols exported
> by the libraries installed on the target system. Therefore, they should be
> prese
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116834
--- Comment #2 from Kacper Michajłow ---
static inline struct bstr bstr0(const char *s)
{
return (struct bstr){(unsigned char *)s, s ? strlen(s) : 0};
}
void bstr_xappend_vasprintf(void *talloc_ctx, bstr *s, const char *fmt,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #322 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #316)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #314)
> > Can you please add the patch to your github branch?
> > I would like to ask some Dreamcast folks to try and test t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113193
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
I've tried compiling this case with
sh-elf-gcc -m4-single -O3 -std=c++20 -c -mfsca -funsafe-math-optimizations
on devel/sh-lra branch -- the issue still persists
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115949
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
I've tried this on the devel/sh-lra branch with
sh-elf-gcc -c -O3 -m4-single -mfsrra -mfsca -ffast-math
The issue still persists.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116835
Bug ID: 116835
Summary: phiprop will prop back into a loop
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116834
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Jump threading introduces the code:
```
[local count: 1073741824]:
if (fmt_2(D) == 0B)
goto ; [0.00%]
else
goto ; [100.00%]
[local count: 1073741824]:
# .MEM_8 = VDEF <.MEM_1(D)>
vsnpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116836
Bug ID: 116836
Summary: [SH] Unknown FPU mode switch state for inline-asm
blocks
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116835
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102138
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2017-November/489192.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116025
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116040
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102138
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2017-November/489192.html
Review from Richard B.:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2018-May/498001.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #323 from Oleg Endo ---
I've tried getting some code size numbers from CSiBE comparision for
'sh-elf-gcc -m4-single -O2' with the devel/sh-lra branch.
The numbers are code size in bytes with -mno-lra and -mlra
OpenTCP-1.0.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116828
--- Comment #4 from Jordan <8e3g6jay6 at mozmail dot com> ---
thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116735
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116830
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*darwin*
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940
Bug 98940 depends on bug 107637, which changed state.
Bug 107637 Summary: [C++23] P2718R0 - Final Fix of Broken Range‐based for Loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107637
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107637
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107637
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:650e91566561870f3d1c8d5b92e6613296ee1a8d
commit r15-3840-g650e91566561870f3d1c8d5b92e6613296ee1a8d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9cafa0c4f0a81304d9b95a78ccc8e9003c6d7a3
commit r15-3839-gd9cafa0c4f0a81304d9b95a78ccc8e9003c6d7a3
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827
--- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> > #if defined(__has_feature) && __has_feature(modules)
>
> This is a bug. If __has_feature is _not_ define, then __has_feature(modules)
> would not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116785
--- Comment #10 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 59186
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59186&action=edit
reduced test (second attempt)
Sorry about the test case. Here is another attempt at reducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116821
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
So looking into why this does not work but PR 57380 does. The testcase in PR
57380 again has an ADDR_EXPR which just happens to be a pointer plus (with a
multiply).
_1 = &b.data[i_5];
_2 = &a.data[i_5]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #320 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Full command line is:
/home/glaubitz/gcc-kaz/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/glaubitz/gcc-kaz/build/./gcc/
-B/usr/local/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/local/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/
-isystem /usr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #321 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #320)
> Full command line is:
>
> /home/glaubitz/gcc-kaz/build/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/glaubitz/gcc-kaz/build/./gcc/
> -B/usr/local/sh4-unknown-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116683
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried adding -munroll-only-small-loops and it still fails.
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #324 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #322)
> I've also created a branch with your patches here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/devel/sh-lra
>
> I've retouched the commits a l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112115
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116828
Bug ID: 116828
Summary: Gfortran 14.0.1 thinks that [ 1 + 1 = 0 ]
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116819
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
So we end up with
t.c:10:22: note: ==> examining statement: _24 = MEM[(const long long unsigned
int &)_5];
t.c:10:22: note: irrelevant.
in the SLP tree as it is part of the DR group but it's really a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Simple reproducer without any libstdc++ indeed:
$ cat a.cpp
#include
$ g++ a.cpp -fmodule-header
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #3)
> where that new USE_CLANG_TYPES macro is defined at the top of the file:
>
>
> #if defined(__has_feature) && __has_feature(modules)
This is a b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116819
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cef29936c6b6773bff1939f94fb629760725bd82
commit r15-3831-gcef29936c6b6773bff1939f94fb629760725bd82
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116819
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116830
Bug ID: 116830
Summary: pubtypes-{2,3,4}.c test failure
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116814
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de6fe690db32689ba5e5c6f551672a19e6cae5d4
commit r15-3832-gde6fe690db32689ba5e5c6f551672a19e6cae5d4
Author: Pan Li
Date: Mon Sep 23 22:3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116826
Bug ID: 116826
Summary: Optimise log (1.0 / x) into -log (x)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #18 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
I can confirm that the patch posted by Iain at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59176 applied on top of (now
pushed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=43eab54939d37d4e634
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827
Bug ID: 116827
Summary: New C++ failures in macOS 15
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #44 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a795b3a5b6a0d8b4b4f38a66ab9782aabead92e
commit r15-3824-g9a795b3a5b6a0d8b4b4f38a66ab9782aabead92e
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
I thought the dependence on -fmodule-header was indicative of an issue with the
libstdc++ compatibility with the macOS SDK, but maybe I'm wrong. I've made it
component == target.
Looking at the ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116828
--- Comment #1 from Jordan <8e3g6jay6 at mozmail dot com> ---
Here's a simplified version that does the same:
program oh_no
use, intrinsic :: iso_c_binding
implicit none
integer(c_int) :: w
w = 1
do
w = w + w
! IT'S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116829
Bug ID: 116829
Summary: Missing default initialization of finalizable
non-polymorphic intent(out) arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101100
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c0d79c783f5c289651d76aa697b48d4505e169d
commit r15-3827-g0c0d79c783f5c289651d76aa697b48d4505e169d
Author: Andre Vehreschild
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101100
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116828
--- Comment #2 from Jordan <8e3g6jay6 at mozmail dot com> ---
I have actually examined this further and it seems like it's managing to
perfectly overflow back to 0 somehow. I am not sure if there is supposed to be
some sort of error or any kind o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #45 from Richard Biener ---
I noticed that
get_bitmask_from_range(tree_node*, generic_wide_int const&,
generic_wide_int const&)
is quite high on the profile accumulating profile hits on
wide_int_storage::operator=(wide_int_storage
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116826
Jennifer Schmitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-24
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116815
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> The easiest way to fix this is transform (late in gimple):
> _1 = a_2(D) + b_3(D);
> _5 = MAX_EXPR <_1, a_2(D)>;
>
> into:
> _tmp = .ADD_OVER
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #316 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #314)
> Can you please add the patch to your github branch?
> I would like to ask some Dreamcast folks to try and test the GCC LRA branch
> with some bigger real-world
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84870
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5035d7d015ebd4a7f5df5831cfc1269f9567e06
commit r15-3825-gf5035d7d015ebd4a7f5df5831cfc1269f9567e06
Author: Andre Vehreschild
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116819
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116822
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84870
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 84870, which changed state.
Bug 84870 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression][Coarray] ICE in
gfc_trans_structure_assign, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7651
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84870
What|Remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #317 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #316)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #314)
> > Can you please add the patch to your github branch?
> > I would like to ask some Dreamcast folks t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #43 from Richard Biener ---
Thanks for the work sofar. It seems the back_jt_path_registry::update_cfg
has a "dead" guard against un-adjust_paths_after_duplication paths with
its tracking visited_starting_edges, so for the purpose of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.0|---
Summary|[15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116828
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116832
Bug ID: 116832
Summary: Code after a select-then-abort in an abortable part
executes when the outer select-then-abort completes
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116832
--- Comment #1 from Liam Powell ---
s/bug 52280/bug 43485
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #46 from jeremy rutman ---
I don't know if this is relevant but a certain gcc I was using lately seems to
do fine compiling one of the autogenerated files in question (an AES128 encrypt
file) , but quits unexpectedly when I try compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116832
--- Comment #2 from Liam Powell ---
Here is another example I have found. In this case just one accept triggers
both selects. All Puts here are executed.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;
with System;
procedure Example is
task A is
e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #47 from Sam James ---
> gcc.exe (x86_64-win32-sjlj-rev0, Built by MinGW-W64 project) 5.1.0
GCC 5 is long EOL, unfortunately.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #20 from Mark Mentovai ---
Created attachment 59189
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59189&action=edit
Patch for macOS 14/Xcode 16
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #19)
> The master branch has been updated b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> > > #if defined(__has_feature) && __has_feature(modules)
> >
> > This is a bug. If __has_feature is _not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116833
Bug ID: 116833
Summary: Symbian: incorrect configuration for crtfastmath.o
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116833
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgcc |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116833
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
On IRC rearnshaw said that t-crtfm should have been added to tmake_file when
crtfasthmath.o was added to extra_parts i.e.
--- a/libgcc/config.host
+++ b/libgcc/config.host
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ arm*-*-eabi*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116833
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://fedor4ever.wordpress.com/2024/09/22/gcc-14-1-0-for-symbian-out/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45896
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I noticed that time_get::_M_extract_via_format just ignores any O or E
modifier:
if (__c == 'E' || __c == 'O')
__c = __ctype.narrow(__format[++__i], 0);
So we treat %Ec exac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116833
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|Symbian: incorre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116078
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116815
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #2)
> Did you meant to say "shouldn't be too hard" here?
Yes it should have been "Shouldn't be too hard". That is what you get for
re-reading the comment 3 times and still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12)
> *** Bug 106724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I forgot I had filed PR 106724 until I was looking for a different issue :).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106724
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116615
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116826
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note PR 86710 lists the opposite (except without being a CST for the division).
Just like PR 86710, this applies for log, log10 and log2 too (and the type
variants too).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116775
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> So, e.g. co_await_find_in_subtree/await_statement_expander/find_any_await
> and maybe other coroutines.cc cp_walk_tree callbacks could use some helper
> for CALL_E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116490
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae57e52754ca6c96145a1b7504c2c7613a9e54d9
commit r15-3837-gae57e52754ca6c96145a1b7504c2c7613a9e54d9
Author: Nina Dinka Ranns
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #318 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #317)
> Thanks. I'm going to test this now. It seems that the untested patch from
> comment #312 didn't fix the Ada bootstrap for me.
The iss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #319 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 59188
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59188&action=edit
Preprocessed source from from comment #318
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115361
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116831
Bug ID: 116831
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE with trunk mod vectorising for SVE
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116831
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116735
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116839
Bug ID: 116839
Summary: $fs:(%reg32) is used as memory operand for x32
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116838
--- Comment #2 from Jamaika ---
Thanks for the answer
I don't know who's to blame.
I created ffmpeg correcting the errors as best I could.
FFmpeg is unstable.
Obsolete codecs to be deleted in c23/c++23 aom/avm/open264/xvid
Changing gcc 11.5.0 to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116826
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Note PR 86710 lists the opposite (except without being a CST for the
> division).
>
> Just like PR 86710, this applies for log, log10 and log2 too
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
