https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116795
Li Pan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #10 from Li Pan ---
Thanks
sanitizer
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-libgomp
--disable-libquadmath --disable-libvtv CFLAGS='-O1 -g0' CXXFLAGS='-O1 -g0'
LDFLAGS='-O1 -g0'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240923 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #39 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I'm going to step away from this PR for a few weeks so I'll do a brain dump on
where I am, just in case someone wants to poke at it some more.
This problem in adjust_paths_after_duplication() boils down t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116814
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Yeah, git bisect landed on r15-1671-gf2476a2649e997 for me as well. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116790
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116791
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:723f7b6db841c1a101a2f5b3b6273d8449dae39e
commit r15-3791-g723f7b6db841c1a101a2f5b3b6273d8449dae39e
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116309
--- Comment #1 from Filip Kastl ---
This ICE no longer occurs. If no one objects, I'll close this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #40 from Aldy Hernandez ---
For the record, I still think adjust_paths_after_duplication() isn't giving us
much for all the hassle it's causing.
I compared the number of threaded paths with and without it and the difference
is:
* m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116813
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #0)
> Note that the std::vector -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
> wiring is new in trunk.
Yes, since r15-1689-g8fd84bc009b307
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116817
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Bisect landed on r15-3768-g4150bcd205ebb6 "middle-end: lower COND_EXPR into
gimple form in vect_recog_bool_pattern"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116791
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116812
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09892448ebd8c396a26b2c09ba71f1e5a8dc42d7
commit r15-3792-g09892448ebd8c396a26b2c09ba71f1e5a8dc42d7
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115856
--- Comment #2 from Filip Kastl ---
Looks like the slowdown went away. If no one objects, I'll close this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #7 from Kamil Dudka ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> Yeah, in particular, I'd want to send text to stdout while also sending
> SARIF to a file that shares the input file's name, except with the .sarif
> extension. (i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #17 from Sergey Fedorov ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #16)
Got it, thank you very much.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 113847, which changed state.
Bug 113847 Summary: [14/15 Regression] 10% slowdown of 462.libquantum on AMD
Ryzen 7700X and Ryzen 7900X
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113847
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116795
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pan2.li at intel dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116814
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116814
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116790
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] 6% slowdown |[15 Regression] 6% slowdown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112549
--- Comment #5 from Filip Kastl ---
The slowdown I reported originally disappeared. If you look at the graph, you
can see that the benchmark currently runs slower than on g:ada871cfadd3f496 but
it's now unclear where the slowdown occured (it was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #310 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Hmm, I just realized I performed the tests without enabling LRA by default. I
just noticed that because with LRA enabled, Ada actually fails with:
/<>/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/<>/build/./gcc/
-B/usr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116571
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
The GCN target FAILs that I originally had reported here:
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.dg/vect/slp-11a.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
> "vectorizing stmts using SLP" [-0-]{+1+}
> [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116817
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
I see,
I haven't checked that the value being compared is actually loop invariant.
In this case it's a reduction value and it can't be lifted out of the loop.
Basically in GCC 14 and earlier this was a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116722
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7bf5e53887a467b8c5c8439e5aae3ad4e11e62e
commit r15-3796-gd7bf5e53887a467b8c5c8439e5aae3ad4e11e62e
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116722
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113847
--- Comment #9 from Filip Kastl ---
If you look at the graph, it looks like the slowdown went away.
Should I close this PR?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113832
--- Comment #8 from Filip Kastl ---
If you look at the graph, you can see that the slowdown went away (well, it
returned a few times but currently the benchmark is fast).
If no one objects, I'll close this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116815
Bug ID: 116815
Summary: Make better use of overflow flags in codegen of
min/max(a, add/sub(a, b))
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: miss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116795
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Li Pan from comment #6)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> > Pan Li, if you set your email on Bugzilla to pa...@gcc.gnu.org, you will get
> > permissions to modify bugs :)
>
> Yes and Than
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116790
--- Comment #3 from Filip Kastl ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> I will eventually have a look. LNT indeed only has zen3 regressing in this
> unusal config (-O2 -flto + PGO), but maybe Zen3 is the only machine testing
> this c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116817
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116796
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 116810, which changed state.
Bug 116810 Summary: [15 Regression] tree-vect-slp.cc:3721:18: runtime error:
insufficient space for an object of type 'bool'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116810
Wha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116810
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #41 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 59181
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59181&action=edit
unrtested patch sorting threadable paths
The performance improvement with this patch is:
** mainline
Time v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116817
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116812
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116796
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e97c75d668bacd8a2e901b819e00156f6e9f4c6c
commit r15-3793-ge97c75d668bacd8a2e901b819e00156f6e9f4c6c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116817
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116810
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c04f175de4f3985d783511662375d52f2cf4ad8
commit r15-3794-g2c04f175de4f3985d783511662375d52f2cf4ad8
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111926
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116571
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Stubbs ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #4)
> > The GCN target FAILs that I originally had reported here:
> >
> > > [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.dg/vect/slp-11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116817
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
Waiting for regression testing to finish and will submit.
The condition used before to check for loop invariant is !internal_def.
This of course fails when it's a reduction, which is what happened here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116798
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116820
Bug ID: 116820
Summary: [15 regression] RISC-V: ICE verify_ssa failed for
c-c++-common/torture/pr101636.c
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116686
--- Comment #4 from Edwin Lu ---
Created attachment 59182
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59182&action=edit
verbose output
Here's the verbose output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116686
--- Comment #5 from Edwin Lu ---
Created attachment 59183
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59183&action=edit
tree output
Here's the tree output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116820
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] RISC-V: ICE |[15 regression] RISC-V: ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116789
--- Comment #10 from Slobodkins, Arkadijs ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> .
That's go(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> > The important part is the type alias ali1.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
Sergey Fedorov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vital.had at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe ---
FAOD:
- The current patch is to remove at macOS-15
- I have tested on systems that need to keep the lib
- FX is testing on macOS 15.
* I have already pushed the dependent patch that limits the libgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116796
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116814
--- Comment #1 from Li Pan ---
Ack, thanks for reporting this.
Should be introduced by this commit.
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/f2476a2649e9975d454d179145574c21d8218aee
I am preparing a fix for this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116791
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116810
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116760
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-23
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116760
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113954
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Claudiu Zissulescu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffd861c808f307c865659b556dd5a8c922bd6a51
commit r15-3798-gffd861c808f307c865659b556dd5a8c922bd6a51
Author: Claudiu Zissulescu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116761
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116799
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
It looks like we are increasing pat once too often, i.e., the loop body
while (pat[0] == '*' && pat < pat_end - 1)
pat++;
is executed twice instead of only once. Prior loop2, IL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115873
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 116661, which changed state.
Bug 116661 Summary: Undefined behavior when compiling interop-1.f90 gomp test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116661
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116661
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116571
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #4)
> The GCN target FAILs that I originally had reported here:
>
> > [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.dg/vect/slp-11a.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
> > "vectorizing stmt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100632
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a030fcad4f9f490a08db0a4cad4c22635a0585c1
commit r15-3797-ga030fcad4f9f490a08db0a4cad4c22635a0585c1
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109790
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a030fcad4f9f490a08db0a4cad4c22635a0585c1
commit r15-3797-ga030fcad4f9f490a08db0a4cad4c22635a0585c1
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100632
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|15.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116818
Bug ID: 116818
Summary: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/strided_load_5.c fails since
gcc-15-3735-g664e0ce580a8
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603
Bug 101603 depends on bug 109790, which changed state.
Bug 109790 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE while trying to mangle
operators and their ptmf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109790
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109790
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116740
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116818
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111875
--- Comment #4 from Filip Kastl ---
Ok, I see. There's not much point in optimizing everything on -Og -fsanitize
and it can also lead to sanitizer checks not working properly.
If no one objects, I'll mark this as RESOLVED INVALID.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116795
--- Comment #6 from Li Pan ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> Pan Li, if you set your email on Bugzilla to pa...@gcc.gnu.org, you will get
> permissions to modify bugs :)
Yes and Thanks. I can modify bugs, but could you please help t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Working through J3/24-136r1 by Malcolm Cohen
Subject: DIN-4: Generic processing of assumed-rank objects
Date: 2024-June-24
1. Introduction
"DIN-4 suggests
"Allow generic processing of assumed-rank argum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116795
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:999363c53cf6cd87f75f96388a531e090299b97d
commit r15-3789-g999363c53cf6cd87f75f96388a531e090299b97d
Author: Pan Li
Date: Sat Sep 21 22:3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116795
--- Comment #8 from Li Pan ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #7)
> (In reply to Li Pan from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> > > Pan Li, if you set your email on Bugzilla to pa...@gcc.gnu.org, you will
> > > get
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112916
--- Comment #5 from Filip Kastl ---
I've looked at the graph again and it is true that the graph is very noisy.
If no one objects, I'm going to close this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116816
Bug ID: 116816
Summary: SLP loads (and stores?) need VMAT_ELEMENTWISE support
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116812
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116795
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116669
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
Last rec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115966
--- Comment #5 from Filip Kastl ---
This miscompilation no longer happens. If no one objects, I'll close this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115966
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116819
Bug ID: 116819
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116076
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116798
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-23
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 116804, which changed state.
Bug 116804 Summary: module order dependency with chrono and vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116804
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99274
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at richy dot net
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116804
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116823
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I have a simple patch which allows for this.
> Basically we need to ignore clobbers in 2 places.
Even though clobbers have a vdef, they have no effect on aliasi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116805
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116823
Bug ID: 116823
Summary: phiprop should ignore clobbers
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116823
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116820
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116822
Bug ID: 116822
Summary: [15 regression] RISC-V: ICE in compute_nregs_for_mode,
at config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116820
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
CC|
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
