https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110992
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
See Als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114290
Bug ID: 114290
Summary: GCC output incorrect output with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114284
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e3e4156a5f93e6d62101594ca6660ee9ce9c10e
commit r14-9412-g3e3e4156a5f93e6d62101594ca6660ee9ce9c10e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114291
Bug ID: 114291
Summary: -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fprofile-use at
-O0
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114284
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114284
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99599
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108393
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292
Bug ID: 114292
Summary: ICE with a lambda capturing a constant for VLA
allocation
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113665
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christoph at muppetnet dot net
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112610
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106315
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103944
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111362
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114290
rvalue changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i at rvalue dot moe
--- Comment #1 from rvalue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114290
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114290
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #31 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to john.harper from comment #30)
> Thank you!
>
I encourage folks to move to gcc/gfortran 13. However, if you need it on 12, I
can do so.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin ---
It looks to me like a bug in reload. Reload generates bogus reloads for
insn 14 and deletes insn 10 which sets (reg/f:SI 146).
But the bug was probably exposed by the change I made a few months ago
to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114290
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114290
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jlame646 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] ICU |[11/12/13/14 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106921
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lutztonineubert at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114263
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 114263 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
There's another small testcase in PR114263.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.4, 5.3.0, 5.5.0, 6.4.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
It looks like tile_rows is not being captured correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114291
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
`Declarations used by main, sorted by DECL_UID` is printed by
dump_enumerated_decls
Which is caused by execute_cleanup_cfg_post_optimizing :
```
if ((flag_compare_debug_opt || flag_compare_debug)
&&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|gcov-profile|middle-end
--- Comment #2 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 57658
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57658&action=edit
Patch
This change works around the reload issue for alpha.i and the reduced
test case.
In principle, this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
We could flip the default for -ffold-mem-offsets for HPPA to off for now..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Sam, no. That would be a big mistake.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
Sure, that's fine (I would've CC'd you for your opinion if you weren't here
already). I know you were reluctant already with the m68k PR, but figured this
was different enough to suggest it given the other one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56286
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||FIXME
Last reconfirmed|2013-02-11 00:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111362
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58021
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
The larger point is we don't just disable passes because they have a bug, or
even multiple bugs. We need to do the right thing from an engineering
standpoint, ie, actually debug the problem.
In fact, this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107372
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107372
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114284
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38716
Bug 38716 depends on bug 63401, which changed state.
Bug 63401 Summary: "optimize" attribute overwrites other options
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63401
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85957
--- Comment #29 from Andrew Pinski ---
fexcess-precision=standard was added to C++ front-end by
r13-3290-g98e341130f8798 (for GCC 13).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93271
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
Ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111362
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50531b6d400945793a1d549e6ee941d989319d42
commit r14-9415-g50531b6d400945793a1d549e6ee941d989319d42
Author: jlaw
Date: Sat Mar 9 19:27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111362
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99987
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102250
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c8f0a79a7e1e42f846ddbca14b98b47ddcfd178
commit r14-9416-g7c8f0a79a7e1e42f846ddbca14b98b47ddcfd178
Author: jlaw
Date: Sat Mar 9 20:11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102264
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103183
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106363
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 Regression] |[13 Regression] [modules]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82374
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95326
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108256
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haoxintu at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I have been studying this a bit by looking at the 2023 std and functionality of
printf().
Specifically printf() provides the 'A' descriptor which can be used for float
(kind=4) and double (kind=8). It will a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109990
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-10
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110279
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95351
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114268
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113533
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] Code|Code generation regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105150
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 87886 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87886
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97796
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113533
--- Comment #17 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #16)
> Note that Jakub recently twiddled fwprop to throttle it back a little. As a
> result the regressions seen in this BZ are no longer an issue. I'm going to
> remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81189
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103116
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Aren't we compiling for PA2.0? If so, shouldn't we have a full 14 bit offset
support, even when a load/store hits the FP register file (feel free to correct
me if I'm wrong, it's only been 20 years since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56624
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.1.0
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56624
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
For aarch64, it has been since GCC 13 though for the testcase in comment #6 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|4.7.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111683
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-O3 -fno-tree-vectorize and -O3 -fno-tree-vrp works. I looked at the ever
dump and it is not doing anything suspicious. Looks like range_info usage in
vectoriser is causing the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh the TREE_OVERFLOW part was fixed much earlier than that though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89049
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56829
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note GCC 14 adds the ability to auto-vectorize early exist loops. I am not sure
if this helps this issue here though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression] C |[11 Regression] C code is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90659
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68761
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90134
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|12.1.0 |
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87332
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109817
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal error in ICF pass |[14 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109817
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
93 matches
Mail list logo