https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109871
Bug ID: 109871
Summary: error: call of overloaded ... ambiguous (std::vector
vs designated initializers)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #14 from Thomas Schwinge ---
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12)
>> Note that there's a gnulib module for flock:
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another possibility would be pick up one runtest (e.g. the first one using
O_EXCL which creates some file) and let it perform all executions from that
point on instead of doing the compilations, where the ot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109866
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #0)
> Take:
> ```
> int g(void); int h(void); int t(void);
> int f(int a, int b)
> {
> int c = a - b;
> if(c == 0)
> return g();
> if (c > 0)
> return h();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109868
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 55092
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55092&action=edit
gcc14-pr109868.patch
I think the FE shouldn't initialize those, rather than gimplifier fixing it up
later.
In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109872
Bug ID: 109872
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE on valid C++ code
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109866
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
A small improvement would be:
subl%esi, %edi
je .L5
testl %edi, %edi
jle .L3
jmp h()
.L3:
jmp t()
.L5:
jmp g()
Not to mentio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109873
Bug ID: 109873
Summary: internal compiler error: gfc_get_symbol_decl 内、位置
fortran/trans-decl.c:1587 0x6b4c13
gfc_get_symbol_decl(gfc_symbol*)
../../gcc/fortran/tra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109872
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fb7d49b3c7129fa8a6b500f260abc642929361b
commit r13-7335-g7fb7d49b3c7129fa8a6b500f260abc642929361b
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99417
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109872
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109241
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lozko.roma at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109570
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://sourceware.org/pipe |https://sourceware.org/git/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109866
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #0)
> > Take:
> > ```
> > int g(void); int h(void); int t(void);
> > int f(int a, int b)
> > {
> > int c = a - b;
> > i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109874
Bug ID: 109874
Summary: [SH] GCC 13's -Os code is 50% bigger than GCC 4's
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713
--- Comment #10 from James Addison ---
Hi folks,
Re-stating and confirming the bugreport details here: both gcc-11 (11.3.0) and
gcc-12 (12.2.0) emit bytecode instructions that aren't supported on all
i686-architecture CPUs.
This comment includ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109857
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> We should also consider ignoring the system tzdata files if the bundled copy
> (currently 2023c) is newer.
This would be bad in the Debian case, because the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109857
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> This would be bad in the Debian case, because they backport changes to the
> DST rules from the upstream IANA database, but for Debian stable don't
> change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109874
--- Comment #1 from Marc Poulhiès ---
Forcing GCC 13 to emit non-PIC (as gcc4) code shaves a few insns, down to 28.
```
_SetupCartCHRMapping:
mov r4,r1
mov.l .L3,r2
shlr8 r1
shlr2 r1
add #-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109781
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
Summary|erroneous error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109790
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108118
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9578570e305e77b8c105583506781158c137f743
commit r11-10768-g9578570e305e77b8c105583506781158c137f743
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108265
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:126ffcee89cf3f252c0c89125a64fbe1b0b9255e
commit r11-10767-g126ffcee89cf3f252c0c89125a64fbe1b0b9255e
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104875
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4b0d0b84b719ea9cd3d0a7b0668cdd8055a07d2
commit r11-10770-ge4b0d0b84b719ea9cd3d0a7b0668cdd8055a07d2
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91456
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c02a8eca7bcbe0ee021eddd5f764e8bfcb13b03
commit r11-10775-g5c02a8eca7bcbe0ee021eddd5f764e8bfcb13b03
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:047c0fae82ca1458339e7e9724d125d30b685898
commit r11-10776-g047c0fae82ca1458339e7e9724d125d30b685898
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99982
--- Comment #11 from Scot Breitenfeld ---
Thanks for the standard reference. That is indeed what I was looking for. I
understand now that, in this case, the INTENT refers to whether C_PTR can be
changed and does not relate to the INTENT state of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109861
--- Comment #6 from Scot Breitenfeld ---
Thanks for the standard reference. That is indeed what I was looking for. I
understand now that, in this case, the INTENT refers to whether C_PTR can be
changed and does not relate to the INTENT state of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109861
Scot Breitenfeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109871
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109871
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108344
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf4dcfa6727b89362494bd49e2a28ebd10d767ce
commit r14-912-gcf4dcfa6727b89362494bd49e2a28ebd10d767ce
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108344
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-16
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108265
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108118
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104875
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108344
--- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley ---
On reflection I suspect it is doubtful this is the same bug. However it might
reduce the timeouts when running the regression tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109858
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> The patch will still use GENERAL_REGS when hard_regno_mode_ok for mode and
> GENERAL_REGS(which is the case in PR109610), hope it can also fix this
> regression.
That sounds more reasonable. But, wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6baa800897728fac40fc7153facaf3c7541ff3f
commit r12-9541-ge6baa800897728fac40fc7153facaf3c7541ff3f
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109868
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> Created attachment 55092 [details]
> gcc14-pr109868.patch
>
> I think the FE shouldn't initialize those, rather than gimplifier fixing it
> up later.
> In fac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109866
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
--- Comment #4 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109865
--- Comment #9 from GARY.WHITE at ColoState dot edu ---
Another clue. I'm seeing the same bug in gfortran-13, except that I have to
use -O0 for both cases of mc11ad.f90 in or out of the contains statement.
Similarly, if I put the set of va09a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36603
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||*-mingw* *-cygwin*
Status|AS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23e12322bc03065557d9c0ee238b5b8d7b605c02
commit r11-10777-g23e12322bc03065557d9c0ee238b5b8d7b605c02
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55056|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109860
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109871
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5e5007c4b534391c0a97be56f6024fde1a88682
commit r14-917-gd5e5007c4b534391c0a97be56f6024fde1a88682
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109871
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.2
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick O'Neill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55088cf384d4c43e280ec794217e32fab64070ba
commit r13-7336-g55088cf384d4c43e280ec794217e32fab64070ba
Author: Patrick O'Ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97048
Tony Guilfoyle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tonyguil at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109873
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97048
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Tony, this is just a meta-bug that has links to the real bugs. Please either
add that as a comment to an existing bug (if it's the same as one of them) or
file a new bug (and set "Blocks: 97048" so that it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109741
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94a311abf783de754f0f1b2d4c1f00a9788e795b
commit r14-918-g94a311abf783de754f0f1b2d4c1f00a9788e795b
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109741
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This should be fixed on trunk now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109741
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109875
Bug ID: 109875
Summary: [OpenMP] nteams-var / OMP_NUM_TEAMS → ICV not passed
to the device / default value
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30334
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|gdr at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69976
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is an option now to zero out the call used registers:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.1.0/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-fzero-call-used-regs
But there is not one for zeroing of arrays.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65139
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622
--- Comment #28 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect this has now been fixed with the additional of full _Float128 support
in the C++ front-end and the library work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23867
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mark at codesourcery dot com |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109623
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
// PR c++/109623
struct U {
U() { }
};
struct S {
constexpr S() = default;
U u;
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876
Bug ID: 109876
Summary: initializer_list not usable in constant expressions in
a template
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||9.1.0, 9.5.0
Last reconfirmed|2023-05
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
What fixed it on the GCC 8 branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622
--- Comment #30 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to John Maddock from comment #26)
> (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #25)
> > On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, john at johnmaddock dot co.uk wrote:
> >
> > > While we're opening cans of wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36443
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janis at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39985
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That would be great :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105599
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8307cfd66d29efae9c28f5b32bd677398c92dfe
commit r11-10780-ga8307cfd66d29efae9c28f5b32bd677398c92dfe
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104871
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3417f095f149ba09ca9d4f62bfaf661819a04333
commit r11-10782-g3417f095f149ba09ca9d4f62bfaf661819a04333
Author: Simon Wright
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98202
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
With GCC 13 it's now a pedwarn:
f128.cc:1:1: warning: 'f128' or 'F128' suffix on floating constant only
available with '-std=c++2b' or '-std=gnu++2b' [-Wpedantic]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107568
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4ad0b2287a334613f570c69b7c5320a5a7d7554
commit r11-10785-gf4ad0b2287a334613f570c69b7c5320a5a7d7554
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101118
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72f004746d87f01e5e3872af3214e3fa1b48dfa8
commit r11-10788-g72f004746d87f01e5e3872af3214e3fa1b48dfa8
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105599
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107568
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|10.5
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101118
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe ---
leaving open, I think this might also be needed on 10.x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
On trunk we no longer create a static temporary var for { 1, 2 }, because the
code in finish_compound_literal is now guarded by '&& fcl_context == fcl_c99'
but it's fcl_functional here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41991
Bug 41991 depends on bug 44107, which changed state.
Bug 44107 Summary: gcc emits frame (epilogue) info incompatible with the darwin
{8,9}-unwinder,10-compacter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55610
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622
--- Comment #31 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
It can be an extended integer type in C2x, but then stdint.h would be
required to have int128_t / uint128_t / int_least128_t / uint_least128_t
typedefs, and integer constant suffixes would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109877
Bug ID: 109877
Summary: Support for clang-style attributes is needed to parse
Darwin SDK headers properly
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109877
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||90709
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
--- Comment #18 from Aurelien Jarno ---
Thanks Patrick for working on that and for the backport to the gcc-13 branch. I
wonder if the following patch should also be backported, as it doesn't make
sense to link with -latomic anymore with inline s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109877
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This style of attributes is bad. Because the GNU style attribute is just
token(expression,expression,expression) it seems odd that they added these kind
of attributes without thinking maybe it would be rejec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109774
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f25d2de17663a0132f9fe090dee39d3b1132067b
commit r14-919-gf25d2de17663a0132f9fe090dee39d3b1132067b
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33578
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|bkoz at gcc dot g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|bkoz at gcc dot gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16006
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|bkoz at gcc dot g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18571
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9780
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
