https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108422
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (*groups, i, grp)
{
if (grp->mark != PERMANENT)
if (!omp_tsort_mapping_groups_1 (&cursor, groups, grpmap, grp))
return NULL;
}
first processes:
map(to:*(c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96848
Oliver Rosten changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.rosten at googlemail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108851
Bug ID: 108851
Summary: gcc -pie generates unwanted PE export table
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108854
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108855
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108846
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #4 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104826
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100758
--- Comment #24 from Mayshao-oc at zhaoxin dot com ---
Hi Jakub:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100758
Thanks for your patch. We test it works on all zhaoxin
platforms. We find the same bug still exi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108816
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
The odd thing is that scalar_loop_iters is
unit-size
align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x768d9b28 precision:1 min max >
visited
def_stmt _32 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108825
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae113080a9f98e807db239f3ad2157c64324542f
commit r13-6138-gae113080a9f98e807db239f3ad2157c64324542f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030
--- Comment #7 from Bernhard Manfred Gruber
---
I just want to tell you that I very much appreciate the work you are doing
here! Thank you for the time and thorough commitment!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108261
--- Comment #22 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 54486
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54486&action=edit
Proposed fix v3
Here is the latest version of the proposed patch with a new implementation of
RTco.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108819
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca31bc3366c533a55bfd7f1b9f4959c0c9869a7b
commit r13-6137-gca31bc3366c533a55bfd7f1b9f4959c0c9869a7b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107106
Jonny Grant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jg at jguk dot org
--- Comment #2 from Jo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107409
--- Comment #20 from Rama Malladi ---
@Martin J and @Sebastian P, Let me walk you through the perf data and my
triage.
First, my triage has been on Graviton 3 (neoverse-v1) processor based
instances. Next, I was looking for perf delta going fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108835
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108852
Bug ID: 108852
Summary: Add gcc option for building NT kernel driver
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108850
Bug ID: 108850
Summary: SELECT CASE within BLOCK construct in one subroutine
prevents compilation of another subroutine named
"SELECT"
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99499
DEV LBR changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lbr-dev at yandex dot com
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108825
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108422
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 54491
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54491&action=edit
Testcase - compile with 'g++ -fopenmp' + run
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #3)
> --- a/gcc/gimplify.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108835
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 54487
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54487&action=edit
Proposed fix
Here is the work in progress patch (code could do with a cleanup).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to ishikawa,chiaki from comment #14)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> > (In reply to ishikawa,chiaki from comment #11)
> > > What is exactly the compiler-defined macro when "-Og"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108243
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #8 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108853
Bug ID: 108853
Summary: Add new -mcpu=e500 alias for -mcpu=8540
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108856
Bug ID: 108856
Summary: Increment and decrement on
std::experimental::where_expression should optimize
better
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108825
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108835
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9c83e7789f7eec9871e370739baa55fd70be4cf
commit r13-6135-gb9c83e7789f7eec9871e370739baa55fd70be4cf
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108849
Bug ID: 108849
Summary: __declspec(code_seg("segname")) does not work
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96025
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108855
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108839
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104921
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b99b0f1ee65ad50b5e6d3a57aace616273cc814
commit r12-9190-g5b99b0f1ee65ad50b5e6d3a57aace616273cc814
Author: Alex Coplan
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108567
--- Comment #1 from YunQiang Su ---
Ohhh.
Let me have a check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
This improves the situation. But according to tests of fixed_size_simd in a GNU
Radio prototype it still isn't enough. It seems like I need to always_inline
all non-cmath operations on fixed_size. It'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108422
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108855
Bug ID: 108855
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in eliminate_unnecessary_stmts, at
tree-ssa-dce.cc:1518
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As discussed elsewhere, always_inline is used in various ways, in some users I
guess would like to see an error if it wasn't inlined, but e.g. the uses in
glibc for _FORTIFY_SOURCE where many of the standar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108857
Bug ID: 108857
Summary: [OpenMP] Use of uninitialized var when mapping
unallocated deferred-length character string
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108847
Bug ID: 108847
Summary: unnecessary bitwise AND on boolean types
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108848
Bug ID: 108848
Summary: Accessing class static member of non-dependent
expression using member syntax in dependent context is
rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108835
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Thank you very much for such a prompt fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108841
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-02-20
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108854
Bug ID: 108854
Summary: tbb-2021.8.0 fails on i686-linux (32-bit)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108843
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94908
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
Yes, insertps can select any element from src and insert into any place of the
dest. under sse4.1, x86 can generate
vinsertps xmm0, xmm1, xmm0, 64 # xmm0 = xmm0[1],xmm1[1,2,3]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
>
> --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> As discussed elsewhere, always_inline is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108816
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:63471c5008819bbf6ec32a6f4d8701fe57b96fa9
commit r13-6140-g63471c5008819bbf6ec32a6f4d8701fe57b96fa9
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108858
Bug ID: 108858
Summary: Assert_Failure at exp_ch6.adb:6499
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108339
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:951ca35bdbbde7bb348337d7db3919c4a0628e25
commit r10-11221-g951ca35bdbbde7bb348337d7db3919c4a0628e25
Author: Nelson Chu
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108339
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108804
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108793
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
It's caused by -1 -A -> ~A being invoked from number_of_iterations_until_wrap:
1497 num = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type, wide_int_to_tree
(type, max),
1498 iv1->b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108854
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to davidak from comment #0)
> I don't know how to get the "preprocessed file (*.i*) that triggers the
> bug", but otherwise you should have all requested information.
Unfortunately that's the mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108859
Bug ID: 108859
Summary: Exception thrown by std::filesystem::copy() is wrong
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108860
Bug ID: 108860
Summary: New (since gcc 12) false positive null-dereference in
vector.resize
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108835
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108772
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> another possibility would be to stream "no DIE" info for not late
> created decls
like by setting DECL_IGNORED_P on them? Like maybe with the following
which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98449
--- Comment #3 from Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira ---
LLVM's libcxx already applied this 1-line patchset:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64fc3cd55d586498dd21c5b3cfaa755793913772
Can we have the same here on GCC side (I've already sub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108834
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
> so I wonder if emitting the locations isn't just wasted .rodata if libasan
> considers it being a windows_padding. In GCC 12 libsanitizer it was still
> location:
You are correct, we lost the ability to p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108861
Bug ID: 108861
Summary: notify_all_at_thread_exit() should notify on cond
while lock is held to avoid a race
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98449
Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108856
Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108829
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02d8ab3e4e2f3d9dc12157a98c976d6698e71e29
commit r13-6141-g02d8ab3e4e2f3d9dc12157a98c976d6698e71e29
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108862
Bug ID: 108862
Summary: [13 Regression] CryptX miscompilation on power9 since
r13-2107
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108862
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108862
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, -O2 -mcpu=power9:
__attribute__((noipa)) unsigned __int128
foo (unsigned __int128 x, unsigned long long y, unsigned long long z)
{
return x + (unsigned __int128) y * z;
}
int
main ()
{
unsigned __
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104921
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed3b4de8a648da4e574fb64344e90b6460946511
commit r11-10536-ged3b4de8a648da4e574fb64344e90b6460946511
Author: Alex Coplan
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108862
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108862
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
With -fno-unroll-loops added we get
foo:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
cmpwi 0,3,0
ble 0,.L4
mtctr 3
addi 10,4,-8
addi 5,5,8
li 3,0
.p2align 4,,1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108862
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 54494
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54494&action=edit
gcc13-pr108862.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108862
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 54495
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54495&action=edit
gcc13-pr108862.patch
Variant patch, instead of creating another temporary and moving it we can just
do the hig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108464
--- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski ---
So, there was quite the initial flurry of activity here and then nothing. Any
chance we could get some more movement here? It's breaking a ccache test for
one. Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106465
--- Comment #3 from Martin Uecker ---
Created attachment 54496
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54496&action=edit
patch for C FE
Here is a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108464
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The patches (3 variants) have been posted and are awaiting review. I've pinged
them twice.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108834
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
So clang uses __sanitizer::LLVMSymbolizer:
$ clang jhead.i -fsanitize=address -g && strace -f -s512 ./a.out 2>&1 | grep
execv
execve("./a.out", ["./a.out"], 0x7fffd520 /* 116 vars */) = 0
[pid 5529] exe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108834
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sure, we want to keep using libbacktrace. But libbacktrace can be extended if
Ian is ok with it, or some extensions can be done on the
libsanitizer/libbacktrace side of it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108829
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] internal |[12 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108834
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Sure, we want to keep using libbacktrace. But libbacktrace can be extended
> if Ian is ok with it, or some extensions can be done on the
> libsanitizer/libbacktr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108829
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12cdc0e266f02c3ba4e80c3d971463ff507e049b
commit r12-9191-g12cdc0e266f02c3ba4e80c3d971463ff507e049b
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108829
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe ---
please see the Work In Progress here:
https://github.com/iains/gcc-darwin-arm64
this is a functional branch (although with known issues, since it is a
prototype)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104921
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:617377cc1641e4f63617b192e224bc96dfbbd324
commit r10-11222-g617377cc1641e4f63617b192e224bc96dfbbd324
Author: Alex Coplan
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104921
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101073
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2287a4d9a640fdc2caef6a067830ea65044deb7
commit r13-6145-gb2287a4d9a640fdc2caef6a067830ea65044deb7
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101073
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108550
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108550
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4)
> Why is this a regression? I'm not finding a released version that compiled
> this.
The testcase in comment #2 works both with GCC 5.1.0 and 5.2.0 at least as o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108550
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Ah!
Started with
commit dc062b4986328bfeec3ebd744a9c116e28828bf0
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Wed Aug 5 13:56:14 2015 -0400
re PR c++/66260 ([C++14] Failure to compile variable template with
recursi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108243
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jiang An from comment #8)
> This seems a bug, not merely missing of optimization. The string_view object
> should always be statically initialized, because it has static storage
> duration and i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108847
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|ABI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108848
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108850
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108834
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
I've filed an upstream review request:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144424
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108863
Bug ID: 108863
Summary: Unrolling could use range information
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108863
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108863
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #1 from An
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
