https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |[13 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The important question is if correct code compiled by gcc 11 was working
correctly with libgfortran 11, if yes, then libgfortran 12+ should maintain
compatibility (of course, when soname is bumped, that comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108068
Bug ID: 108068
Summary: decimal signed zero is not honored
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
>
> --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> The important question is if correct code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
--- Comment #11 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
gfortran-11 compiles and run correctly when it uses libgfortran-11.
To be perfectly clear, compilation always work: the issue occurs at runtime
when gfortran-11 compiled code uses libgfortran-12).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108069
Bug ID: 108069
Summary: Cant expand multiple parameters packs when used with a
concept prefix when used inside a variadic templated
lambda
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108044
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 54068
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54068&action=edit
gcc13-pr108044.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107409
--- Comment #14 from Rama Malladi ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #13)
> Note the mentioned revision is a fix and yes, sometimes these revisions can
> end up with a regression as profile estimation is a complex guess.
Yes, possibly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108070
Bug ID: 108070
Summary: failure to combine range test to bit test
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108070
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
Yes it's all been approved now, doing a regression after a rebase and will
commit today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
Bug ID: 108071
Summary: 13 regression: Build failure in Libreoffice
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106912
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108062
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-12
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to jo.rickert from comment #6)
> Thanks, I thought the name had to be unique per translation unit.
That can't possibly work. You would have to define the entire program in one
translation unit,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108062
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Why am I having to say this AGAIN?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107886#c7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107886#c9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104592#c3
http
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108062
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106433
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Interestingly the cgraph node for 'bar' doesn't have any clones when it changes
pure/const state so we cannot update those as well.
create_version_clone_with_body as used by OMP cloning doesn't populate
th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107407
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0e37f97e67c99604129eeac2e73ccd3719ccb28
commit r12-8973-ge0e37f97e67c99604129eeac2e73ccd3719ccb28
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106868
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad6ace70ba38d2052eeb5adb9672d33f59867be0
commit r12-8972-gad6ace70ba38d2052eeb5adb9672d33f59867be0
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107647
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9fafa2f533e25c57528c0294e19a154197848dd
commit r12-8974-ga9fafa2f533e25c57528c0294e19a154197848dd
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104077
Bug 104077 depends on bug 106868, which changed state.
Bug 106868 Summary: [12 Regression] Bogus -Wdangling-pointer warning with -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106868
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107766
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e242f8a2d5987ddaa74696e5ad809303ddc8dd0
commit r12-8975-g9e242f8a2d5987ddaa74696e5ad809303ddc8dd0
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107686
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:232305bd0c8dd37b17b815864e730aa630714606
commit r12-8976-g232305bd0c8dd37b17b815864e730aa630714606
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107839
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:812847a9d12c0b65695cbe1a23959b69a7e62355
commit r12-8977-g812847a9d12c0b65695cbe1a23959b69a7e62355
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107647
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107407
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107865
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09469705318de7a0fe5f10f5d5b92870d3fada6e
commit r12-8978-g09469705318de7a0fe5f10f5d5b92870d3fada6e
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106868
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.2.1
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|12.2.1 |12.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107898
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a8af01a8386fcda16a61dc17f11ba9cfbfd
commit r12-8979-g1a8af01a8386fcda16a61dc17f11ba9cfbfd
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107833
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:812847a9d12c0b65695cbe1a23959b69a7e62355
commit r12-8977-g812847a9d12c0b65695cbe1a23959b69a7e62355
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107833
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.2.1
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107865
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 107647, which changed state.
Bug 107647 Summary: [12 Regression] GCC 12.2.0 may produce FMAs even with
-ffp-contract=off
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107647
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108057
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108072
Bug ID: 108072
Summary: [13 Regression] gcc/libbacktrace/elf.c:5144: multiple
definition of `backtrace_uncompress_zstd' with
--with-build-config=bootstrap-asan since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108072
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus ---
First, there were several issue in GCC 12 related to using CFI_. Thus, using
GCC 12 is
highly recommended.
This can be seen when implementing the function using the following code (and
removing ', name="sy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108073
Bug ID: 108073
Summary: [rs6000] sub-optimal float member accessing on struct
parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
I get the same errors, but the whole file can be compiled without errors with
gcc-12 (it needs to be preprocessed with gcc-12 as well), and with a gcc-13
checkout
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108064
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 54070
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54070&action=edit
gcc13-pr108064.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108073
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
>
> --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus ---
[...]
> Thus, we have two options:
>
> (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108074
Bug ID: 108074
Summary: Incorrect stringop-overflow warning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Hi!
I came across this problem as well.
I use the __attribute__((section(".data"))) as a kind of hack to get a function
in the RAM using the standard linker file and startup provided for ST
microcontrollers.
Not being able to make a debug build is inaccepable! With older GCC/binutils
versions t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2022-12-12 00:00:00 |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108060
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-12
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Trying to reduce it now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108074
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-12 0:00
--- Comment #5 from J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The ConstCharArrayDetector is getting instantiated with const char* const
instead of const char[1], so the partial specialization doesn't match.
':
include/c++/13.0.0/debug/formatter.h:369: undefined reference to
`_ZTIPDF16_'
This issue exists in GCC >= 12, including trunk (at least as of CE gcc version
13.0.0 20221212).
Checked on Linux x86_64 and aarch64 (on CE).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108072
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108072
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Ah, great, I was trying to grep what's difference for other algos, but didn't
find this hunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108043
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108044
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] ice:|[13 Regression] ICE:
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108059
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108065
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108066
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108067
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-12
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108075
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104162
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alastair.j.irving at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108074
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 108074, which changed state.
Bug 108074 Summary: [11/12 Regression] Incorrect stringop-overflow warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108074
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Got a build failure of clang-14 on this week's gcc. Minimal example:
This week's gcc-13 fails:
$ result-bad/bin/g++ -c bug.cc.cc
bug.cc.cc: In member function 'void Linker::ConstructJob(const ArgList&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #7)
> Got a build failure of clang-14 on this week's gcc. Minimal example:
Forgot the example itself:
// $ cat bug.cc.cc
#include
class OptSpecifier;
str
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98034
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:320ac807da125e6dc952b3d4abf02daeead88d44
commit r13-4612-g320ac807da125e6dc952b3d4abf02daeead88d44
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108024
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c0f9584013dbedeacacb041d40ce9005b902df0
commit r13-4614-g6c0f9584013dbedeacacb041d40ce9005b902df0
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108062
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108024
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98034
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 98034, which changed state.
Bug 98034 Summary: std::atomic_signed_lock_free and
std::atomic_unsigned_lock_free not defined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98034
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108075
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-12
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108076
Bug ID: 108076
Summary: GCC with -O3 produces code which fails to link
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108076
--- Comment #1 from Martin Dørum ---
Created attachment 54075
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54075&action=edit
Preprocessed source code from gcc --save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108076
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108070
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina ---
Committed, implementing the tbranch optab should allow this to be fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108076
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-12
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108060
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|UBsan missed an |[10/11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108076
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108059
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
There might be a dup of this bug already but I can't seem to find it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa11fc62ddee81a8bc3e69d5e3180695a6dbb666
commit r11-10417-gfa11fc62ddee81a8bc3e69d5e3180695a6dbb666
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103698
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The change for binutils came from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26850
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108068
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105751
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102805
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks to be fixed in GCC 12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108066
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108067
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93371
Konstantin Demin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rockdrilla at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108062
--- Comment #6 from Jamaika ---
Thanks Jonathan
Thanks for the quick fix of the given errors. I realize that there may be other
errors not necessarily from gcc.
Test new codecs HTJPEG2000 C++20 Grok with spdlog 1.11.0 for Windows 10
In file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93371
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
plorer/gcc-trunk-20221212/include/c++/13.0.0/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/c++allocator.h:33,
from
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20221212/include/c++/13.0.0/bits/allocator.h:46,
from
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20221212/include/c++/13.0.0/list:63,
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo